User talk:JuTa/Archive 05

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:No_Parking_(India).svg

Would you mind un-deleting this file please? It's true it didn't have a license, but it's too simple to be copyrighted and should come back. Thanks. Fry1989 ^eh? 04:34, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Fry1989. OK, its back. I just renewed the "no license" tag. Pls. correct it yourself. And you might like to undo the delinker activity too. regards. --Ju Ta 09:59, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. Fry1989 ^eh? 20:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Androgen_receptor_3-d_model.jpg

Hi JuTa,

I very recently contacted the creator of this image and received permission to use it. I forwarded the email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Could you please restore this image?

Thanks.

I'll make a similar post on the "undeletion request" page as well.

Jonathan.Marcus (talk) 22:05, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jonathan, I temporarily undeleted it because OTRS is pending. This gives you, the copyright holder and OTRS-stuff about 30 days to clarify it. --Ju Ta 22:14, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Judges of Tomsk district court during Bhagavad Gita trial.JPG

The author sent the permission to use the image shortly after the image was uploaded. Please restore it. Also note that it's one of several images of the same author. Thanks.--Gaura (talk) 21:14, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I am currently working on the old backlog on Category:OTRS pending - No timestamp given. As long as I could find non of the other images of this author was confirmed by an OTRS member yet. In the image there was only a {{OTRS pending}} template set. Normaly an OTRS volounteer sets {{OTRS received}} when he start working on the case and {{OTRS}} when he/she's happy with the case an the release is valid. Here nothings happened like that. After a month such images are eliggible for deletion. The other images are not deleted yet just because I didn't checked them yet. I now left a note at OTRS noticeboard to clarify the situation. If the release(s) get confirmed I will be happy to undelete this images. But if they cannot be confirmed the other images must be deleted as well I'm afraid. I will now wait some days for reactions from OTRS stuff. regards. --Ju Ta 22:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

As I didn't got response til now I assume that there is no valid release and deleted the other images too. If the release nevertheless is or will become valid pls let me know. I will be happy to undelete them. regards. --Ju Ta 19:30, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

I didn't got response til now I assume that there is no valid release - well, it's another way to state that I've been lying all this time. And also the author of the pictures who sent an e-mail with the permission to use all of these images back in April. If you didn't get a confirmation from OTRS folks that there's no valid licence, it only means that they had no time to check it. I think the most practical solution here would be for me to contact the author and ask him to resend the permission. But for that you'd have to undelete all of the deleted files. Thank you in advance for that.--Gaura (talk) 09:31, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Feel free to ask yourself on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard and/or start an Commons:Undeletion request. Such items are normaly eligible for deletion 30 days after the OTRS pending template was set. Here nearly 4 month have passed before they got deleted. I'm sorry. --Ju Ta 09:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm just asking you to undelete the images so I can ask the author to resend the permission. Is it too much to ask? It is needed because the author will have to provide links to the images he's releasing under free licence.--Gaura (talk) 10:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

The links you and/or the author can see here Just klick on the red links in that chapter. But OK, I'll undelete them now and set a "fresh" no permission tag. Pls. replace that with {{OTRS pending|year=2012|month=July|day=XX}} as soon the author resent his mailto OTRS, where you replace XX with the then current date. regards. --Ju Ta 10:58, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Greetings from Mexico

Hi, I want to clean up my images, I want to delete some files that are useless, I would like you to help to eliminate them. Just want to leave my best images to commons. Thank you very much.--Marrovi (talk) 19:19, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Pls. start a regular deletion request for them. But be aware: You granted a free license for them a long time ago. These licenses are non-revocable - see here. I would not see a real good chance that these images will be deleted. regards. --Ju Ta 19:29, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, regards!!--Marrovi (talk) 04:40, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, that was a good start but not realy correct.I now fixed it - see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tequixquiac Mapa.jpg here. regards. --Ju Ta 19:21, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

OTRS pending

I tried to add July 6 to that image when I uploaded early this morning. It showed as a redlink category so I reverted it. I didn't want to put July 5 and violate the w:en:Temporal Prime Directive though.--Canoe1967 (talk) 20:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, no problem. You can create such "daily maintenence" catgories yourself. Thats what I did in this case. I normaly just go to the of the category of the day before, copy the source code of the older cat and paste it with a corrected date to the new one, which was {{OTRS pending header|day=6|month=July|year=2012}} in this case. regards --Ju Ta 05:26, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I will try that next time. If I break it, I will just say that you told me to do it that way.(kidding)

This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Canoe1967 (talk) 11:14, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

OTRS received vs. no permission since

Hi JuTa. Is the general policy that the no-permission-since template shall be remove from a file page if the OTRS-received template is set? I expected that the nps template shall be kept as OTRS-received does only say the there is email contact but not neccessarily that the permission will get valid at all. Although I'm going to clean up old file pages where the OTRS process was never completed, in most cases I think that the normal deletion after 7 days should prevail. Please advise. --Krd 08:12, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Well I'm working on old backlog of Category:Media missing permission. This image was in a category eligible for deletion since 9 days now. On July 4th you added the OTS receivd template which indicates the release process in in progress and you are working on it. Quote from Category:OTRS received: If nothing happens for 30 days or more then uploader or OTRS-staff should be informed. This indicates for me that this OTRS received item should not be deleted for 30 days starting with July 4th when you set this template. Thats like in Category:OTRS pending 30 days ago eligible for tagging with {{subst:nopd}} or deletion: 2012/06/07. Why you tagging such an image with OTRS received without any other notes when you expecting admins to delete it immediatly? Thats just confusing me. --Ju Ta 08:52, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

PS: Wir können uns auch gern auf deutsch unterhalten. --Ju Ta 08:53, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Ich dachte, das könnte vielleicht auch andere interessieren, die hier mitlesen. Vermutlich entsteht mein Irrtum aus der Durchlaufzeit der DÜP auf dewiki, die ja deutlich langsamer ist. Bei den hiesigen Abläufen ist es dann wohl besser, das no-perm zu entfernen. Hätte ich auch selbst drauf kommen können.

The problem is, that there often is no answer to the OTRS reply, and somebody has to take care of these, too. There are currently at least two OTRS agents work on it; we'll see in a few weeks if this is going to work. Thank you. --Krd 09:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

OK. Well I'm trying to work on several backlogs, but I'm starting with the easy ones. If nobody else will be quicker than me I will start looking after the old Category:OTRS received items when I went through the subcats of Category:Unknown, which will take a while. --Ju Ta 09:18, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

I started a maintenace page at Commons:OTRS/received a few days ago, where the oldest entries are listed on top. I plan to reask the OTRS contacts for permission again, and tag all who have already been reasked as copyvio. This has just started and is going to take a while. You are welcome to help here. --Krd 16:47, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Lake with fountains in Denmark.JPG

I am wondering what exactly you mean by This file has a license or does not need one. in this change. As I have written on uploaders talk page I suspect that it might be sourced from this page in which case it does not have sufficient information on its copyright status as per the {{No license}} you removed. It might also be {{Copyvio}}, but to me it is not entirely obvious, in which case I believe that {{No license}} is the right tag to use. I hereby encourage you to either revert your edit on the filepage or enlighten me as to what template to use. In kind regards, heb [T C E] 11:08, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Well, I'm currently working on the backlog of Category:Media uploaded without a license and Category:Media without a license. There are several thousend images to check. You marked this one as no license but there was and is a license template on the description page. A quick google search for this image gave me no results (execpt Commons/Wikipedias). Your message on the users talk page does not realy connect to that image but to an non existing File:Templates. I didn't recognized that you are talking about this image. So I assumed AGF and just tusted the uploaders words that its own work and kept it. Now I know the source webpage and will mark it as "no permission", which fits IMHO much better this case, because there is a license in the image but it might not be valid because it might be not own work as stated by the uploader. PS: You might consider using the "quick delete" gadget within your preferences which makes marking as no license no permission etc. much easier and informs the uploader automaticly. regards. --Ju Ta 18:52, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Better late than never I suppose, but thank you for your explanation and especially the hint about the gadget :) In kind regards, heb [T C E] 08:49, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

This media may be deleted.

Okay --Queenc2 (talk) 10:36, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Amiga 1000 PAL.jpg

File:Amiga 1000 PAL.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Psychonaut (talk) 11:33, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

I think I fixed the problem. --Ju Ta 19:42, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Does not have permission

Hello JuTa, the images does not have permission. The user:Zoldyick told me not have the permission of these images ([1], [2], [3]), see my talk page [4] (in Portuguese). The user:Zoldyick has no experience with the Commons, so there is no permission to use these images. Lucas Secret (talk) 23:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:HL Damals - KFA Rueckansicht.jpg

Hi JuTa. Ich las gerade deinen Hinweis, dass bei dem obigen Bild meine Infos nicht vollständig sein sollten. Gerne werde ich dies beheben, sehe aber momentan nicht was da fehlen sollte. Für einen entsprechenden Hinweis wäre ich dankbar. Wo wir gerade dabei sind, ist das inzwischen okay? --1970gemini 07:43, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, den Hauptmangel hattest Du ja bereits selbst beseitigt, nämlich dass kein (valider) Lizenzbaustein vorhanden war. Wenn Du jetzt noch das Datumsfeld korrigierst wärs noch besser, z.B. auf {{other date|by|1907}}. Dort ist immer die Entstehung des etsprechenden Bildes gemeint und nicht das Hochladedatum. Gruß --Ju Ta 19:57, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Hallo, ich hatte dich ja bereits auf das andere Bild angesprochen. imho hatte ich den Liznzstein in das Feld eingefügt. Für den Fall, dass jemand nicht zufrieden sein sollte, bat ich in der Bilddisk. um Rückmeldung. Das Bild war zudem in die categorie des Photographen eingereiht. Da keine Rückmeldung erschien, nahm ich an dass es i. O. wäre. Wie du dir evtl. vorstellen kannst, war ich, als ich eben heimkam, relativ verärgert, dass das Bild von irgendjemandem aus dem Wikiuniverse ebntfernt wurde. Da ich hier relative neu und fremd bin möchte ich dich darum bitten, soweit du dort über entsprechende administrative Rechte verfügst, das Bild zurückzuholen. Thanks for your troubles. --1970gemini 19:16, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, ich hab' grad den "problm tag" von ersten Bild entfernt. Und das andere Bild ist ja bereits wieder da. Gruß --Ju Ta 18:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Vielen Dank dafür. --1970gemini 21:08 13 July 2012 (UTC)

File:1907-O Half.jpg

I reverted the "no permission" tag you added to File:1907-O Half.jpg. I don't understand why you put that tag on this file. The license was clearly indicated on the original en:W upload as: "Copyright (c) 2005 Peter Clericuzio. Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License". Scan by Peter Clericuzio, 4 Aug 2005." If you didn't know, the coin which this is derivative of is {{PD-US}}. Curious, -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:47, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Well, when somebody uploads somebody else work, like here, we normaly request a verification through OTRS by this problem tag. I know its an old coin, but its not pure 2-D. We should verify who shot the photo and if he/she is willing to distrubute the photo under the license stated. regards --Ju Ta 06:45, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Looks to me like the Wikipedian is stating they put the coin on a scanner, and uploaded the jpg they created from the (public domain) coin under the above license. Thus it looks to me that the only person who would be required to provide permission has already provided it. However if you think something is unclear, or that my understanding of what was stated in the original upload is wrong, you might ask en:User:Absecon 59. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:04, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

That question is if Peter Clericuzio is equal to en:User:Absecon 59. That was not clar (for me) according the description page. But I missed to check his other contributions/uploads where he regularly use the same name (my bad). It seems now creditble enough (even to me) that the original uploader is the person named as author. Ceers. --Ju Ta 19:42, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Allen Covington Morris.jpg

Why was I not notified of this request? Is there any way for you to tell me the file history? It appears that the picture was up for speedy deletion in February and that was declined. At a minimum, can you provide me with the link to the source that I used so I can review the information? If it isn't available in the public domain, it would certainly be fair use material for en.wiki.Ryan Vesey (talk) 20:41, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

You were not notified because you were not the uploader. Here the history of the image:

2012-03-09T09:39:07 . . Trex2001 (Diskussion | Beiträge | Sperren) (669 Byte) (Nominating for deletion)
2012-03-07T05:56:00 . . Sreejithk2000 (Diskussion | Beiträge | Sperren) (516 Byte) (Undo revision 67380921 by Trex2001 (talk) Please raise a DR instead of copyvio)
2012-02-22T15:13:16 . . Trex2001 (Diskussion | Beiträge | Sperren) (574 Byte) (Marking as possible copyvio because Quote of website: Some of the images may be protected by copyright)
2011-12-14T07:36:11 . . CategorizationBot (Diskussion | Beiträge | Sperren) (493 Byte) (Image is categorized by a bot using data from CommonSense)
2011-12-13T02:24:42 . . CategorizationBot (Diskussion | Beiträge | Sperren) (276 Byte) (Please add categories to this image)
2011-12-12T23:36:13 . . Connormah (Diskussion | Beiträge | Sperren) (226 Byte) ({{Information |Description ={{en|1=Allen Covington Morris}} |Source =http://www.floridamemory.com/items/show/22673 |Author =unknown |Date =unknown |Permission ={{PD-FLGov}} |other_versions = }})
2011-12-12T23:36:13 . . Connormah (Diskussion | Beiträge | Sperren) 600 × 741 (42.395 Byte) ({{Information |Description ={{en|1=Allen Covington Morris}} |Source =http://www.floridamemory.com/items/show/22673 |Author =unknown |Date =unknown |Permission ={{PD-FLGov}} |other_versions = }} )

you can see the source page. Feel free to reupload it to en: if it fits to their rules, which I don't know. regards. --Ju Ta 20:49, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh thanks, that makes sense, I thought I had uploaded it because I knew I had uploaded an image to use on that page. In actuality, I uploaded File:Joan and Allen Morris in Revolutionary Costume for One of Their Christmas Cards.jpg. Another editor uploaded the now deleted version and replaced mine. Thanks for clearing that up for me!Ryan Vesey (talk) 20:56, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Pictures to delete - second request

Hello. As already indicated, please delete my two incomplete (without any interest) pictures :

File:Couette rotational rheometer - Plate and plate - Cone and plate system.jpg

Thank you. --Cjp24 (talk) 17:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

No. sorry. --Ju Ta 20:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

??? As already indicated, "File:Rotational rheometers-Couette-Searle-Plate plate-Cone plate types.png" supersedes these 2 bad files. --Cjp24 (talk) 21:52, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for the short answer before. I try to explain my decision more detailed now: I added the "superseding" in the gallery above. They looking very different and the old images might be in use anywhere outsite the "wikiworld". There is no licensing or similar problem with them. The only problem they have is that the uploader doesn't like them anymore, but that is normaly not a reason to delete images. Accidential uploads can be quickly removed by uploader request some hours or days after upload but not after months like here because there is a high chance that anybody in the world is using them. We would cut their source. You can try to reraise the deletion requests and list them to the current daily log page. Maybe another admin will follow your arguments and delete them. regards --Ju Ta 18:10, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Couette rotational rheometer - Plate and plate - Cone and plate system.jpg → there is IMO no need to keep the badJPG version that has a near-duplicate. --Leyo 21:14, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Kalman_Tihanyi_(British_Air_Ministry).jpg

Why did you delete an old photo? It was taken in 1929 by unknown photographer (perhabs one of his colleague)!!!

Restore it!--84.0.59.226 17:44, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Well the description page told us that the copyright holder is Tihanyi's colleague, with given source Memoir and license GFDL. We would need either a realease through COM:OTRS by that colleague or we need to know who took this photo and his/her live dates. Only if the photografer died before 1942 the image would be public domain. But feel free to raise an COM:Undeletion request, perhaps I'm missing something in this case. regards. --Ju Ta 17:58, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Who was the person who warned you about the photo? Was he the banned romanian user: Iaaasi? He is not banned in the commons, he is banned only in English wikipedia. His hatred against Hungarian related articles are well known. Did he asked you to do this? Did you act as his gadget/tool?

The author of the photo is unknown. It was founded in the photo albums memoires of his girl Katalin Tihanyi. His father worked in the Air ministry lab between 1929-1931. The photographer is unknown, therefore you must restore the photo, which you deleted under unfounded supererogation --84.0.59.226 19:14, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

The one who set the {{No permission}} tag was User:Magog the Ogre (an admin like me). Maybe you like to ask him for undeletion and have better luck... or you raise like recommended an Undeletion request. regards --Ju Ta 19:58, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

According to this logic: all old WW2 photos must be deleted, because the photographer is not known.

Can you delete some pictures?

Can you delete File:Ciudad de Mexico collage.png and check the rest of the contributions by User:Purice21? The user releases everything as self published, and it all appears to be doubtful, especially after I have definitively proved that the first image was copyrighted.Ryan Vesey (talk) 00:17, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

I've nominated File:Map of megacities in 2006.JPEG for speedy deletion as well.Ryan Vesey (talk) 00:26, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

The same user Purice21 also claims to be the owner of File:Buranovskiye Babushki at ESC 2012.jpg and it is very obvious they cannot be. The user would have to have been standing right on the same stage as the performers to have taken that image personally. Either that or its a screenshot from TV footage or a saved image from the European Broadcasting Union's Eurovision.tv website. Wesley Mouse 01:21, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Fine, all his images ar marked with problem tags, are nominated for deletetion or are allready deleted. --Ju Ta 06:28, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

TOO in Brazil

Given the low threshold of originality for the only country we've observed in Latin America, what led you to close Commons:Deletion requests/File:Santos FC logo.svg as keep? And the logic "I hope it's simple enough" violates COM:PCP. Magog the Ogre (talk) 19:24, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

OK, I undid my decision. DR is open again. Lets wait some more weeks or months for another admins decision. Cheers. --Ju Ta 19:31, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:25, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Kevey Balázs.jpg

Hi! In 27th of june, the author of the image sent an e-mail with the permission to the "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org". What was the problem, why did you delete the file? Thanks, --Hirvenkürpa (talk) 13:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, there was nothing stated on the description page about this sent mail. Only a {{No permission since}} 27.6.2012 was present, so i deleted it after 7+ days. I have undeleted it now and set the {{OTRS pending}} tag, which protects the image for aprox 30 days against deletion (starting 27.6.). For the future: Please set yourself the OTRS pending tag as soon you know the mail was sent. The easiest way is to add {{subst:OP}} to the description. regards. --Ju Ta 19:07, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Verschiebewunsch

Hallo JuTa,
kannst Du bitte File:Bruchsal (24).jpg nach File:Bad Schönborn (24).jpg zurückverschieben? Irgend etwas ist da schiefgegangen. Danke und Gruß --Bubo 容 16:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Done. Cheers --Ju Ta 17:49, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Alain Van de Walle JKA Ieper.JPG

Tesjor (talk) 12:23, 25 July 2012 (UTC) This media file is uncategorized. The Category is been placed as Karate

Nice, but why you telling me this? --Ju Ta 14:13, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Question

Just tell me, by whom? None asked for it, i can if needed? :) --WhiteWriter ^speaks 23:21, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes, please go ahead. Those cases normaly get undeleted by OTRS stuff when the case is confirmed... regards. --Ju Ta 23:34, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Question Deleting

Hello JuTa, what is this for an argu "is in use"? Any file can be in use and be unused!? Why should a "normal" user delink all files on request? Where stays this deleting policy? -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 10:21, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, about the policy - pls. see Commons:SCOPE#File_in_use_in_another_Wikimedia_project. About which deletion request exactly you are about? Cheers --Ju Ta 11:35, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Hej, thanks, I see this argue is only for deleting reason (concrete may be) "poor quality" and any other (then user/user talk pages) is not enough for it to be within scope. I see this argue offten. A concrete file is[5] The deleting argue was for all PNG afterwards copy of SVG files. The conrete SVG original is File:Flag cuiaba.svg. Sorry if I forgot to link this, it would be very nice if you would correct them afterwards. I've delinked the 2 uses. Cheers -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 17:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

OK,

Done. --Ju Ta 20:16, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

FoP cats.

Please be less bold when adding discussions to these categories. Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Lithuania Kaunas monument 1.jpg, for example, did not concern FoP, it was just a trivial deletion of a duplicate file. These categories become less useful if they are crowded with irrelevant members. --65.111.173.161 20:21, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

But the duplicated Image:Lithuania Kaunas monument 2.jpg was deleted b FOP reasons. I'll re-add the category... regads. --Ju Ta 20:23, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Schau mal

Moin, unklare Lizenz [6] --Toen96 (talk) 14:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Ja, aber was erwartest Du von mir in diesem Zusammenhang? --Ju Ta 14:46, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

User talk:JuTa/Archive 05

Contents

File:No_Parking_(India).svg

File:Androgen_receptor_3-d_model.jpg

File:Judges of Tomsk district court during Bhagavad Gita trial.JPG

Greetings from Mexico

OTRS pending

OTRS received vs. no permission since

File:Lake with fountains in Denmark.JPG

This media may be deleted.

File:Amiga 1000 PAL.jpg

Does not have permission

Copyright status: File:HL Damals - KFA Rueckansicht.jpg

File:1907-O Half.jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Allen Covington Morris.jpg

Pictures to delete - second request

Kalman_Tihanyi_(British_Air_Ministry).jpg

Can you delete some pictures?

TOO in Brazil

File:Kevey Balázs.jpg

Verschiebewunsch

File:Alain Van de Walle JKA Ieper.JPG

Question

Question Deleting

FoP cats.

Schau mal

Navigation menu

User talk:JuTa/Archive 05

Greetings from Mexico

OTRS pending

OTRS received vs. no permission since

This media may be deleted.

Does not have permission

Copyright status: File:HL Damals - KFA Rueckansicht.jpg

File:1907-O Half.jpg

Pictures to delete - second request

Kalman_Tihanyi_(British_Air_Ministry).jpg

Can you delete some pictures?

TOO in Brazil

Verschiebewunsch

Question

Question Deleting

FoP cats.

Schau mal

Navigation menu

Search