User talk:Jokopein
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:55, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Please give images better names
[edit]
- Reventtalk 21:44, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
Misidentification of File:01 31.03.2017 11-21-00-BA-W.2017 11-21-00.jpg
[edit]-
your photograph
-
Veronica chamaedrys
-
Veronica persica
Hi Jokopein, I just changed the ID of your photograph shown above to Veronica persica. Veronica persica has got single flowers on long stalks arising from the axils of leaf-like bracts, whereas Veronica chamaedrys has got racemes of many flowers on stalks arising from the leaf axils. The individual flowers of Veronica chamaedrys have also got bracts, but these are tiny and do not look like ordinary leaves. So this must be Veronica persica (or possibly a lookalike species, which is very unlikely, though). With best regards, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:41, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- By the way, in my opinion the web page mentioned on your image page, i.e. [1], shows (from the top down): very probably Veronica chamaedrys, Veronica filiformis and three times almost certainly Veronica persica. Best regards, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:49, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Jokopein,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 00:59, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Jokopein,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Jokopein,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 19:57, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
3 misidentified spurge images
[edit]-
your photo
-
your photo
-
your photo
-
Euphorba cyparissias
-
Euphorba cyparissias
-
Euphorbia cyparissias (illustration)
-
Euphorbia esula
-
Euphorbia esula (illustration)
Hi Jokopein, I changed the ID of the plants in your three photographs left above to Euphorbia cyparissias. Euphorbia esula agg. has much wider leaves. Of course, identification of the plants on your personal site is also mostly wrong. There is a single image, the ninth from the top, that might belong to Euphorbia esula. With a leaf width of below 3 mm it should be Euphorbia cyparissias, but E. esula agg. with wider leaves. ID of the microspecies of Euphorbia esula agg. is a bit tricky. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 10:23, 9 July 2023 (UTC)--