User talk:Jmh2o/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dampremy - Chapelle Saint-Ghislain - 2014-10-04 - 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Strong vertical distortion - could you fix that? --PtrQs 01:46, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done--Jmh2o 20:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
OK now. --PtrQs 01:06, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Petit Bitu - 1983.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BrightRaven (talk) 15:04, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dampremy - monument aux morts 1914-1918 - la Semeuse - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:45, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bois du Cazier.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - église Saint-Christophe - coupole - saint Marc - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - église Saint-Christophe - coupole - saint Mathieu - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - église Saint-Christophe - coupole - saint Jean - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bruxelles - Mont des Arts - Darville - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 23:32, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - monument Paul Pastur - 2020-02 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:52, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - monument Paul Pastur - 2020-02 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 18:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove deletion requests

Bahasa Indonesia  বাংলা  Deutsch  English  español  français  magyar  Nederlands  Nederlands (informeel)‎  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  svenska  Türkçe  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−


Please do not remove deletion request tags from images before an administrator has closed the debate. If you do not agree that the image should be deleted, you can express your opinion on the deletion request page. You can find this page via a link in the deletion request tag or at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you.

--Sealle (talk) 06:13, 17 March 2020 (UTC) @Sealle: ok. --H2O(talk) 07:35, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Catégorie streets and squares

Salut à toi,

Quand tu crées une catégorie du type "Streets and squares in /ville/" est-ce que tu peux mettre également une redirection depuis "Streets in /ville/", nom de catégorie également très utilisée, ça facilite le travail après pour ajouter des rues aux villes.

Amicalement,

Ldgdps (talk) 01:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

@Ldgdps: bonjour. Ma difficulté viens que la commune/ville, c'est Charleroi fusionné = Category:Streets in Charleroi. Quand j'ai créé des catégories pour les rues des sections, j'avais un doublon pour la section Charleroi (ancienne commune) par rapport à Charleroi (commune fusionnée). Et une redirection ne changerais rien quant à ce doublon. Je suis preneur d'une solution qui puisse garder cette cohérence. Si tu as des idées. Bien à toi. --H2O(talk) 11:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Un idée : renommer toutes les catégories "Streets and squares in /ville/" en "Streets in /ville/" et renommé la catégorie Category:Streets in Charleroi actuelles en "Streets and squares in Charleroi". Donc inverser le nom d'une catégorie mère et d'une catégorie fille. Ou un autre nom cohérent pour la catégorie mère. Qu'un penses-tu ? --H2O(talk) 11:05, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
J'ai regardé comment c'était pour les autres villes, et j'ai procédé à un renommages de "Streets and squares in /ville/" en "Streets in /ville/". --H2O(talk) 18:04, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Salut,
La différenciation streets and squares n'est pas toujours utile, par streets on regroupe tout en général ruelle rue place avenue boulevard.
Sur les autres commune je fais ainsi : Streets in commune (ex. Charleroi) - avec toutes les rues et places et les sous-catégories Streets in "section de commune".
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Streets_in_Binche
Ldgdps (talk) 19:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Bonjour @Ldgdps: c'est finalement ce que j'ai fait. --H2O(talk) 20:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Ok ça marche.
Ldgdps (talk) 20:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Merci. Comme tu vois, je me suis beaucoup promené dans la ville. En attendant les jours meilleurs pour compléter la photothèque. --H2O(talk) 20:16, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi Communal Cemetery - Visitor's book - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Thy-Marcinelle - 2016-09-10 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Don't you think it's too dark? --Podzemnik 02:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
I have reduced the foreground shade to bring out a few details. Is it better ? --Jmh2o 11:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 Support Isn't a different pictures now? Good though --Podzemnik 00:03, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - rue de Montigny 114 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - rue de Montigny 114 - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:34, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - rue de Montigny 114 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare du Sud de Charleroi - 2016-07-10 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Shame about that wire. --Peulle 12:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gare du Sud de Charleroi - 2016-07-10 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - monument Paul Pastur - 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - 2019-08-24 - 01 - quai Paul Verlaine et quai Arthur Rimbaud.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 00:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - 2019-08-24 - 02 - quai Arthur Rimbaud et Quai 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 00:23, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - 2019-08-24 - 05 - quai Arthur Rimbaud et quai de Sambre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - 2019-08-24 - 03 - quai Arthur Rimbaud et Quai 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 06:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done --Jmh2o 09:38, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Fêtes de Wallonie - Messe en wallon - 2015 - Flanqueurs de la garde de Beignée - 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 22:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Square Jules Hiernaux - 2020-05-09 - COVID-19 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi- Grand-Rue 100 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 06:00, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - caserne Trésignies - 2020-06-23 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hwwo 18:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - caserne Trésignies - 2020-06-23 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hwwo 18:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - maison Lafleur - 2020 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A little bit soft, but good light emphasizing all details. --Aristeas 06:57, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Darville - monument à Jules Destrée - 2020-07-06 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:38, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Plan des "tenures d'eau" qui se trouvent à Dampremy, entre la Buchère et Charleroi (1688).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Plan des "tenures d'eau" qui se trouvent à Dampremy, entre la Buchère et Charleroi (1688).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - boulevard Jacques Bertrand 58-62 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:33, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Beffroi vu de la rue Neuve - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:46, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Rue de Dampremy - été 2020 - couleurs et ombres - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:52, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Beffroi vu de la rue Montal - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Beffroi vu de la place du Manège - 2020-08-01 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality IMO, a description and a caption in English will be wellcome on the page of the image.--PJDespa 18:56, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - Palais provincial - Robert Delnest - L'Industrie - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PJDespa 19:05, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - Palais provincial - Robert Delnest - L'Agriculture - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - pont roi Baudouin - 02 - garde corps Art déco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It would benefit from a perspective correction --Poco a poco 09:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done but object is not realy vertical everywere. --Jmh2o 10:13, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Pont Roi Baudouin - été 2020 - ombres - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - A la tête saint Jean - enseigne - 2020-06-29 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:55, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - Beffroi - 2020-07 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - Beffroi - 2020-07 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - David Mesguich - Lucie et les papillons - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - David Mesguich - Lucie et les papillons - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - David Mesguich - Lucie et les papillons - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons - David Mesguich - Lucie et les papillons - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:03, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Boulevard Joseph Tirou 88 - 2020-08-15 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:12, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marchienne-su-Pont - Anciennes aciéries Léonard-Giot-Allard - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 11:28, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcinelle - Haut fourneau numéro 4 - 2020-08-22 - 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Immeuble ERCO - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Rue de la Broucheterre 18-20 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcinelle - Haut fourneau numéro 4 - 2020-08-22 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marchienne-au-Pont - cimetière - tombe de Thomas Bonehill - relief - 2020-08-22 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Lighting is not ideal, but still QI --MB-one 11:05, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 Comment
I know, the relief is oriented to the north and there are a lot of trees around. --Jmh2o 12:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lodelinsart - église Sainte-Marie - 2020-09-09 - 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A rather extraordinary location. --PtrQs 20:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dampremy - vitrail Art nouveau - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:19, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - clouds at sunset - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. The cloud type should be properly identified and categorized. --MB-one 10:42, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Where in the World Is Carmen Sandiego?

The realy question is Where in the World Is Poco a poco? Incredible, he's everywhere… --H2O(talk) 15:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

You are talking to yourself here? :) I like travelling and find some for it every now and then :) --Poco a poco (talk) 10:06, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
I admire the number of photos you have shared. Thank you. --H2O(talk) 10:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Palais des beaux-arts - annexes - 2020-06-07 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:00, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - crèche Hélios - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcinelle - avenue Paul Pastur 76 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde - Zeedijk 254 - Les ailes picardes - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good composition and good quality -- Spurzem 16:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde - Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-ter-Duinenkerk - 2020-09-21 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde - Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-ter-Duinenkerk - 2020-09-21 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde - Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-ter-Duinenkerk - 2020-09-21 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde - Onze-Lieve-Vrouw-ter-Duinenkerk - 2020-09-21 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:37, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcinelle - avenue Paul Pastur 76 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 07:56, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde - Les Buisons, Belle et bonne, Mon plaisir et Angela - 2020-09-22 - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality, geocode would be fine. --Palauenc05 16:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde - Les Buisons, Belle et bonne, Mon plaisir et Angela - 2020-09-22 - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde - Les Buisons, Belle et bonne, Mon plaisir et Angela - 2020-09-22 - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:19, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - crèche Hélios - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Spike 15:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koksijde - 2019-11-17 - Noordzeestrand - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 22:04, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - crèche Hélios - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:10, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Hôtel-de-Ville - Tourelle - 2019 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 21:18, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - maison Grenier - 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lodelinsart - château Goffart - 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support The top could be a bit sharper but it's definitely good enough. --Trougnouf 07:38, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dampremy - château Passelecq - ancien Hôtel de ville - 2018 - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Can you adjust the brightness, please? Otherwise image is good for me --PantheraLeo1359531 18:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done --Jmh2o 20:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Thank you :)--PantheraLeo1359531 10:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - La Samaritaine-Porte de ville - 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
At least 2 fat dust spots --Poco a poco 22:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done --Jmh2o 07:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
You fixed one (at least one of the two I saw) but there is another one at the top left border --Poco a poco 19:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:48, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornu - Édith Barbieux - Femme immigrée, pont entre générations et cultures - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - monument aux martyrs - histoire - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcinelle - cimetière - monument aux victimes du Bois du Cazier - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs more specific category/ies --Poco a poco 12:40, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
✓ Done, merci pour la remarque. --Jmh2o 20:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marcinelle - cimetière - monument aux morts pour la patrie - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 December 2020 (UTC)