User talk:Jeses

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Proposal: Picture of the Year and Picture of the Month contests

[edit]

I have posted a new proposal on Commons talk:Featured picture candidates regarding the creation of FP-related contests and would like your feedback on the idea. This message is being sent to some of the regular contributors to Commons:Featured picture candidates. Alvesgaspar 16:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POTY election implemantation

[edit]

Some help in needed to organize the POTY election. Please check the conclusions of the discussion in Commons talk:Featured picture candidates. What do you think of doing the election in the period 15-31 January? - Alvesgaspar 14:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

[edit]
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Mexico City Palacio de bellas artes.jpg , that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Mexico City Palacio de bellas artes.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 23:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP promotion

[edit]
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Sunset-cartagena-tower-Igvir.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Sunset-cartagena-tower-Igvir.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Alvesgaspar 17:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons Picture of the Year 2006 Competition

[edit]
 Interested in honouring the best of the best? Vote now in the
Commons Picture of the Year competition 2006
Voting to select the finalists is open until 14th February.

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | Nederlands | português | svenska | 中文（简体） | 中文（繁體） | +/−

The arrangements for the Commons Picture of the Year 2006 competition are now complete, and voting will start tomorrow, Feb 1st. All Featured Pictures promoted last year are automatically nominated. As a past contributor to Featured Pictures, we invite you to participate in the competition (but please wait until tomorrow to vote). --MichaelMaggs 21:57, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP discussion

[edit]

You might like to have a look at the FP discussion at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Silvereye - Zosterops lateralis to see if you want to review your vote. --MichaelMaggs 23:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Schleienloecher2-1- B.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for supporting this picture. I propose a new edit suggested by Michael Apel. What did you mean about the gaussian blur? Yours sincerely. Vassil 16:17, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lviv FP

[edit]

Hello! You voted on my pictures of Lviv on FPC [1]. Now, somebody, who don't like this image (and maybe me) want to delist it month after featuring and nominating to POTD. What do You thik about it? Maybe You vote to keep FP for my photo! See here: [2] Thanks!!! --Lestat 09:16, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Markham-suburbs aerial-edit2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Markham-suburbs.id.jpg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

-- Cecil 05:56, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Picture of the Year/2007

[edit]

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that became a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Picture of the Year/2008/Preparation

[edit]

We are starting the discussion on POTY 2008. Would you like to join? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:09, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion

[edit]
 ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image Image:Priit Narusk at Tour de Ski.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Priit Narusk at Tour de Ski.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Simonizer (talk) 19:05, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finnair Stadium Helsinki.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good --Mbdortmund 21:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lindsey Van crop.JPG

[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token f2cd0f258c4b18d519a324652eb64ea1

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


File tagging File:4wiki_schlierenzauer_gregor.jpg

[edit]
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:4wiki_schlierenzauer_gregor.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:4wiki_schlierenzauer_gregor.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Kam Solusar (talk) 12:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:World record icon.png

[edit]
File:World record icon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

194.8.192.162 14:44, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olympic record icon.png

[edit]
File:Olympic record icon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

194.8.192.162 14:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Positionen FCN am Saisonende.png requires updating

[edit]

Hi Jeses,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed File:Positionen FCN am Saisonende.png is out of date. Could you update it? Thanks again. --Nordprinz (talk) 22:48, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, ich bin eigentlich bei Wiki nicht mehr aktiv und habe deswegen auch die ursprüngliche Open-Office-Tabelle, von der die PNG-Grafik ein Screenshot ist, nicht mehr. Ich sehe allerdings auch keine Notwendigkeit, die Grafik zu aktualisieren, da es ja mittlerweile die automatisch auf Datenbasis erstellte Übersichtsgrafik "Ligaübersicht und Platzierungen" gibt (Im Artikel FCN ca einen Bildschirm weiter oben). Diese ist vom Format her einheitlich mit den Artikeln zu anderen Fußballvereinen und macht diese alte Darstellung obsolet. --~~ Jeses (talk) 14:16, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, stimmt. Deine Grafik ist im Artikel nicht mehr erforderlich durch die neue. Hab ich übersehen. Ich nehm dann Deine Grafik aus dem Artikel raus (doppelte Infos bringen ja auch nichts). Vielen Dank für Deine Unterstützungen in der Vergangenheit und alles gute. Freundl. Grüsse --Nordprinz (talk) 15:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jeses&oldid=646363635"