User talk:JLPC/Archive 6

-- 13:15, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

User talk:JLPC/Archive 6

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anémone FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 10:26, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courgeac Eglise 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villebois-Lavalette 16 Maison Sénéchal 2011 .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 18:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barèges 65 Lac Nere 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 19:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jonzac 17 Gargouille Hôt de ville 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect! --Moroder 15:06, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Point de croix FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 18:42, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chadurie 16 Panneaux D674 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Boring but good --Poco a poco 21:32, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Gervais-et-Saint-Protais (Jonzac, France), facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Colosseum interior 2012 sweep panorama.jpg

Thanks for reviewing the image so carefully. I think I've fixed the errors. Could you have another look. Cheers, Colin (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your compliments on my talk page about panos. Most of my panoramas are taken by lots of images stitched together using Hugin and Photoshop. However, a few of them, like the colosseum ones, were taken using my Sony camera's "Sweep panorama" function. I just point the camera in portrait orientation and sweep the camera smoothly from left to right. It takes loads of images and stitches them for me. The results look good on a computer screen but rarely bear scrutiny at 100%. I thought this one had no errors, but you found some small ones. Unfortunately, this method means I don't have any means of truly fixing the errors -- only patching them up so you can't see them. Cheers, Colin (talk) 20:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Just looked at your user page. Your images are good! I like the one with the castle and the sheep. I'm guessing you use Hugin too. It is worth using Smartblend instead of enblend. Google for it and if you have problems getting it setup with Hugin then ask me for details. It does a much better job of blending the joins, especially when people move or there are small parallax errors. Colin (talk) 20:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charmant Chapelle cimetière 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 20:00, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charmant 16 Place 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 20:18, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jonzac 17 Enseigne Coq d'Or 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add a blank line between nominations --The Photographer 20:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC)  Done :). --JLPC 10:22, 28 February 2013 (UTC) Good quality. Prenn 07:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cymbidium fleur FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:44, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glycine grappe FR 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Aulaye 24 Pannonceau notaire2 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:00, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Privat-des-Prés 24 Arcature&modillons 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 16:59, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Privat-des-Prés 24 Tympan 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Pb en VI

ta dernière nomination a un problème. Dans la date que tu as modifié peut être...--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:36, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

• Erreur en effet : la date de fichier ne correspond pas avec les données exif, c'est peut-être la raison du problème sur la page VI. J'ai demandé un renommage du fichier. Lorsqu'il aura été effectué, je vérifierai que le blocage venait bien de là. Merci, une fois de plus, de ton attention ! Très cordialement. JLPC (talk) 13:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poullignac Église 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too much denoising for my taste but QI anyhow --Poco a poco 19:08, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Sternbergia lutea

Cher JLPC,

Comme vous pouvez le voir sur la page Sternbergia lutea, cette amaryllidacée est à tort appellée « Crocus d'automne ». Elle est naturalisée de longue date dans le Sud-Ouest. Elle poussait ainsi en abondance dans la résidence d'été de feu mes parents en Dordogne. J'en ai il y a une vingtaine d'années déplanté quelques bulbes que j'ai replantés dans mon jardin en Belgique. Ils s'y multiplient végétativement, mais ne fleurissent pas très abondamment et ne forment pas de graines car nos étés ne sont pas assez chauds.

Le genre Crocus comporte quelques 90 espèces, dont un bon tiers fleurit en automne. Il ne faut par ailleurs pas confondre les "vrais" crocus d'automne - dont deux sont indigène en France : Crocus nudiflorus (Cévennes et Pyrénées) et Crocus ligusticus (Alpes maritimes) - avec les colchiques, dont la majorité des espèces fleurit également en automne.

Amicalement, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 13:54, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Quentin-de-Chalais Tuiles&cheminée 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Your mail

Hi, I was not able to answer to your mail in private. Thanks a lot for your mail and your " solar" reasoning which is not always possible with some of our (German) colleagues. Thanks so mutch for appreaciating my pictures and your English is almost perfect. With best regards Wolfgang

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cymbidium Boutons sève FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 21:28, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bouquet jonquilles FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Aulaye 24 Tombe Légion d'honneur 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Moroder 20:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Aulaye 24 Pannonceau notaire3 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sign is very sharp, but due to massive (over-)sharpening the surrondings of the sign (the wall) looks very overprocessed. Probably you can sharp more moderately. --Tuxyso 21:06, 7 March 2013 (UTC)  Done : new file uploaded. --JLPC 17:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC) Much better. QI now. --Tuxyso 22:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brouage 17 Ronde Pertuis 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:15, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint-Aulaye (France), facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:54, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:47, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Civray Mur absidiole nord.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint-Privat-des-Prés (France), tympanum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 21:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

VIC talk page

Hi JLPC!

I have started two discussion topics at Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list. But it seems that this page is visited less frequently. Hence thought of notifying you as you are a regular editor at VIC. Please put your views, if any, on these topics. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Barthélemy-de-Bussières 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 20:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême 16 Chapiteau musée 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Aulaye 24 Tour&cheminée 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 20:05, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clivia FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Rjcastillo 20:06, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cymbidium cultivar (Boat orchid), buds and sap.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:30, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aubeterre 16 Sagitaire & homme 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juignac 16 Soir de vent 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Bgag 19:15, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Amant 16 Neige & traces 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 21:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juignac 16 Labours-octobre 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice work. --Selbymay 20:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Martial Bénitier et fonts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is slightly CCW tilted and vertical distorted. Corrections in LR: Rotation +0,5; Vertical +5 (also see notes) --Tuxyso 22:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)  Done : new file uploaded. --JLPC 17:47, 10 March 2013 (UTC) Perspective is much better now. But (sorry that I haven't seen it earlier) is it possible to manage the noise somehow better? Especially the wall and ceiling look somehow overprocessed (too much sharpening + too much NR?) to me. --Tuxyso 21:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)  Done : new file uploaded. --JLPC 18:26, 12 March 2013 (UTC) Much better, good work - QI now. --Tuxyso 06:11, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Juignac (France), choir and altar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Useful.--Jebulon (talk) 16:24, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Des catégories

Bonjour JLPC, Je te signale l'existence de la Category:Quality images of churches in France, qui pourrait servir pour un certain nombre de tes images :) Pour les VI, il existe une catégorie moins fine : Category:Valued images of architecture. Amitiés, --Myrabella (talk) 16:39, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 18:37, 15 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment Bit noisy background and near oversharpening. Border-case for me. Good colours and composition though. Biopics 19:45, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plassac-Rouffiac 16 Prunus place 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Rjcastillo 18:37, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aubeterre 16 Chapiteau portail bestiaire 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:18, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint-Barthélemy-de-Bussière, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:06, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 04:11, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spathiphyllum FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks OK to me. --Tuxyso 21:18, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Église St-André Annonciation 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coq Cou nu FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, but is there a Category with a Latin animal name? --Tuxyso 19:59, 17 March 2013 (UTC) Yes, there's one. Thanks. --JLPC 18:29, 18 March 2013

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soyaux 16 Sac poubelle 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:43, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris Coin de rue 9e arr. 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Less donoising better, but ok --Poco a poco 22:22, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spirogyres FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and interesting -- George Chernilevsky 19:49, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StMartial Viveyrol 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Romain 16 Cimetière 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jonzac 17 Entrée Marché 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 20:05, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Verteuil-sur-Charente, France, chevet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support All criteria --Ercé (talk) 20:18, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
• Chevet isn't a very common word. It seems to be a special case of apsis, which could be used. If not simply exterior. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:39, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
  • "Exterior" would be too broad a scope (the nave is not visible on this picture). Even though this is a small church, "chevet" seems to be the right word for French architecture (see : apse, please). But I don't want to be too dogmatic : if some specialists want to help us, I'll change the scope and ask for a new vote. Regards. --JLPC (talk) 09:31, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment I see no reason not to make this a mainscope nomination. Lighting is good, it is unobstructed, and it is used by six projects.[1] Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 15:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint-Quentin-de-Chalais (France), facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 15:59, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cloister and gallery in Chalais, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:58, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 16:08, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loudenvielle 65 la Neste 2009b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition and colours --Moroder 19:35, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villebois Chateau Cour 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 20:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arcouest 22 Brume d'été 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême Boutique à l'abandon 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

L'eglise en VI

Ton scope pourrai être : "Vue extérieure de l'Abside"... demande à Jebulon ce qu'il en pense. Bonne journée... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:22, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Merci de ta suggestion : je viens de l'adopter, très rapidement car je déjeune en ville (!). Demanderai l'avis de Jebulon ce soir ou demain (journée très chargée)... si personne n'est passé avant. Merci encore et bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 11:02, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Moi, si on me demande mon avis, je dirai(s) que ça me va...--Jebulon (talk) 12:12, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Vendu! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Merci à vous deux ! --JLPC (talk) 13:53, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gallus gallus (Naked neck), male.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:44, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anémone FR3 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 17:54, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muscari à grappe FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bois-Plage-en-Ré 17 Girouette vendangeurs 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bois-Plage-en-Ré 17 Volets clos 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aubeterre 16 Intrados polylobé 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

VI : The castle ruin Hauenstein in Seis

Bonjour, j'attire ton attention sur la première image en VI qui va "tomber" car, le scope ayant changé en cours de rout,e ton vote ne peut être pris en compte. Si tu le confirme, par contre, l'image passe. Bonne journée. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:59, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle of Villebois-Lavalette, France, courtyard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

best in scope, and nice stitch, btw !--Jebulon (talk) 12:28, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Courgeac (France), apse, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:54, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:25, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Malo Tombe Chateaubriand 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments great view --Rjcastillo 19:56, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourcefranc-Le Chapus Balises 2010b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:56, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau Panorama 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice view --Rjcastillo 19:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmier de Chine Feuille FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Fort-sur-Gironde 17 Port-Maubert Balise 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:08, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aubeterre 16 Mur calcaire érosion 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Ercé 06:38, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tombe de François-René de Chateaubriand, Saint-Malo, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support File:Tombe Chateaubriand.jpg is used more, but this one is not cut off and lacks the somewhat distracting powerboat in the background. The soft lighting and the bouquet add to the composition, I think. Criteria satisfied, in my opinion. Walter Siegmund (talk) 14:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brouage Le marais des remparts 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.--ArildV 19:08, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brouage Toits&remparts 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourcefranc 17 Tracteur Manitou MC10 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sky a bit noisy, but, OK object main. --Rjcastillo 05:43, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hénanbihen 21 Brouillard 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 21:32, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Brouage

Bonjour JLPC,
Oh, tu charges des photos de Brouage ! En dédicace, voici un de mes premiers versements sur Commons (depuis, j'ai progressé techniquement, mais perdu en fraîcheur de regard ;). J'en profite pour te remercier pour tes revues de mes images de la Tapisserie de Bayeux. Amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 10:38, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

"Vous êtes roi, sire, vous pleurez et je pars..."--Jebulon (talk) 13:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

N.B. : Ce n'est pas Marie, c'est Myra ! --JLPC (talk) 21:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Quel assaut d'esprit en cette citadelle ! --Myrabella (talk) 08:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

C'est beau, la culture !--Jebulon (talk) 10:03, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Il y aurai comme un début de communautarisme des Charentes-Maritimes que çà ne m'étonnerai pas! Je me demande si un quota des images de Charentes-Maritimes... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:38, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Toi, le Toulousain, si tu veux qu'on se fâche, continue à mettre des "s" à "Charente-Maritime" !! J'ai fait refaire ma première carte professionnelle à cause de ça. "La" Charente-Maritime, il n'y en a qu'une, unique, indivisible et, comme aurait dit Pierre Dac, "individuelle et portative". Je n'ai jamais compris pourquoi on dit "les Charente", alors qu'il n'y a qu'un fleuve ! Dit-on "les Rhin", "les Loire", "les Marne" ? ça m'éneeeerve !--Jebulon (talk) 14:58, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Parce que grâce au pineau des Charentes, on voit double ? --Myrabella (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

C'est du brouage de crâne !--Jebulon (talk) 18:55, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Qui vous rend si hardis de troubler mon brouage ? -- Un peu tard, certes, mais... à suivre ! --JLPC (talk) 21:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Amant 16 Boîte aux lettres 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soyaux 16 Enseigne notaire 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:07, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cymbidium rose FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:49, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rose de Noël FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:21, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villars 16 Église 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marshes of Brouage, looking S.-E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:44, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hendaye Corniche basque 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Irun Plaiaundi Parc écologique 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 21:12, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royan Port de plaisance & terrasse 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rennes 35 Manège&reflet 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 18:37, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Irun:Ecological Park of Plaiaundi (high tide).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:59, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:28, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lys royaux Pollinisation FR 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good IMO--Lmbuga 17:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epiphyllum fleurissant FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 17:09, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aubeterre 16 Restauration partielle 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Need small vertical perspective correction --Nino Verde 16:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)  Done. New file uploaded. --JLPC 20:19, 8 April 2013 (UTC) Comment Not done. Check the middle column - it is straight, but left and right columns are inclined to the center. --Nino Verde 08:56, 9 April 2013 (UTC)  Done. New file uploaded. --JLPC 16:34, 9 April 2013 (UTC) Good now. And thanks for noticing invalid markup! --Nino Verde 16:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torsac 16 Porte&treille 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 18:36, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Quentin-de-Chalais Restauration 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:36, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hendaye : the Corniche basque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pierre Loti's place of death, Hendaye, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support OK, it works. The best of the three available (could have its own category or gallery ?) IMO. une campagne de photos s'imposera quand la maison de Rochefort réouvrira après les travaux....--Jebulon (talk) 22:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:St-Malo Tombe Chateaubriand 2010.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St-Malo Tombe Chateaubriand 2010.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

C'était chaud, mais c'est passé ! Félicitations !--Jebulon (talk) 21:18, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Trop chaud, donc j'utilise mes ongles sur les dernières minutes! (Too hot; so I use my nails on the last minutes!) JKadavoor Jee 05:58, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

J'avais préparé un communiqué de presse dans le style : "La tombe de Châteaubriand était au bord de l'abîme et elle a fait un grand pas en avant". Et puis la cavalerie est arrivée,ou, si Jebulon préfère, deux Grouchy au lieu d'un Blücher. Merci, bien sûr, à tous et en particulier à Selbymay et Jkdavoor, qui ont sauvé, à la dernière minute, un monument patrimonial en danger de n'être point remarquable. -- Conclusion : j'ai encore besoin de faire de gros progrès. Quand j'aurai 120 ans , peut-être... Bien cordialement à tous.

For Jee : During the last few days of the voting period, I prepared a press release : "The tomb of Chateaubriand was on the edge of the abyss and it made ​​a big step forward." (1)... And then the cavalry arrived, or if Jebulon prefers two Grouchy instead of one Blücher (2).Thank you, of course, to all and especially to Selbymay and Jkdavoor, who saved at the last minute, a heritage monument in danger of being unassesed ! - Conclusion: I still need to make significant progress. When I'm 120, perhaps ... Best regards to all. --- Notes : (1) : Traditionnal French joke based on a would-be politician's discourse : "When I was elected, our country was on the edge of the abyss but, since, we've made a big step forward". -(2): During the Battle of Waterloo (1815) Grouchy, a French general was trying to reach the battlefield with reinforcements. Napoleon, almost defeated, was expecting Grouchy and his soldiers' arrival. Unfortunately, the Prussian general, Blücher, arrived first. Then the French army was defeated and Napoleon forced to abdicate and to leave France. (Sorry for my English)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batz-sur-Mer 44 Granit 2009b2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renoncule a FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau gare 16 Train travaux 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality on the main subject, still your camera seems to apply heavy noise reduction, losing details, see annotations --Kreuzschnabel 18:15, 13 April 2013 (UTC) I tried to improve. Thanks for your help. --JLPC 21:18, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anemone rose FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:22, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plassac-Rouffiac 16 Silo&carrefour 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmoreau gare 16 Container&bobines-bois 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church and churchyard of Fontaine, (S.-W. view), Dordogne, France.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:11, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:26, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iris Feuilles2 c-j FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:49, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Epicéa Cônes&branches FR .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Bgag 18:10, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Laurent-de-Belzagot 16 Monument 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 18:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pérignac 16 Fumure 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sare 64 Habitat traditionnel 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 00:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iris Feuilles1 FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Gidip 07:48, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault 8 France 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:19, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chavenat 16 Modillons Façade 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little bit too much denoising, but ok --Poco a poco 20:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mouthiers-sur-Boême 16 Lion 1 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clématite montagnes FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:20, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bréhat 22 Escalade Paon 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Jean-de-Luz 64 Bassin port 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 18:35, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chavenat 16 Vieux puits 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 18:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mouthiers-sur-Boëme 16 Tympan 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:52, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Bardenac, France, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:29, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aubeterre 16 Chapiteau endommagé 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! --Moroder 14:31, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Verteuil, France, S.-E. view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angoulême 16 Borne incendie 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 17:41, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verteuil 16 Château 3 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a little too much contrasted and and satured but good quality. --Christian Ferrer 17:16, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chavenat 16 Église façade 2 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy sky but just ok --Poco a poco 21:02, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Chpelle Grésignac Poids public 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 18:05, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marennes 17 Nid de cigognes 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 18:27, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orchis bouffon FR 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 18:26, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Chavenat 16 Vue générale 2013.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)