User talk:Halavar/Archive8

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Widok na góry i drogę do miasta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Czołg T-72 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the main object, sharp enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 13:53, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Goris, Widok na Stary Goris (Kores) (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 17:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Goris, Widok na Stary Goris (Kores) (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 13:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO perspective correction necessary. --XRay 07:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)  Done New, fixed version uploaded, please take a look again. --Halavar 20:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC)  Comment Please check again. IMO it's tilted CCW. I put a note to your image. --XRay 16:24, 26 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Thanks. Hope it's better now. --Halavar 17:08, 26 January 2016 (UTC)  Support Yes, OK now. --XRay 15:04, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Goris, Widok na Stary Goris (Kores) (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 13:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (64).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Katedra Chrystusa Zbawiciela (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 20:33, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Czołg T-72 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:55, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Goris, Widok na Stary Goris (Kores) (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Poco a poco 20:45, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (068).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Katedra Chrystusa Zbawiciela (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:40, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Goris, Widok na Stary Goris (Kores) (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 21:41, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Klasztor Tatew (54).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:20, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (055).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 23:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Wajoc Dzor, Trasa Spitakawor - Szatin (38).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 23:30, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Katedra Chrystusa Zbawiciela (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:22, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Katedra Chrystusa Zbawiciela (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Stepanakert, Monument My i Nasze Góry (02).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Monument My i Nasze Góry (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (063).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Katedra Chrystusa Zbawiciela (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 15:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:31, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Widok z klasztoru Tatew na okoliczny krajobraz (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 11:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Twierdza (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:57, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Twierdza (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Meczet Yukhari Govhar Agha (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:07, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Plac miejski.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:46, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Meczet Yukhari Govhar Agha (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Twierdza (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:25, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Meczet Yukhari Govhar Agha (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 14:35, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me. --Hubertl 20:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Belfry of Cathedral of Christ the Holy Savior. Shushi/Shusha, Nagorno-Karabakh..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Inskrypcje alfabetem arabskim na budynku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --A.Savin 15:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Pomnik - ławka (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:39, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Państwowy Uniwersytet Arcachu (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Twierdza (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Zorac Karer, Prehistoryczny kompleks megalityczny (062).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Meczet Ashaghi Govhar Agha (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 09:54, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Twierdza (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Artsakh State University in Stepanakert/Xankəndi, Nagorno-Karabakh. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:53, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Yukhari Govhar Agha Mosque in Shushi/Shusha, Nagorno-Karabakh. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:35, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:19, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:19, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Twierdza (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Katedra Chrystusa Zbawiciela (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (59).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (45).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I had been somewhat sharper, but still good for me.--Famberhorst 16:16, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Hotel Armenia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:03, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Budynek Związku Bojowników o Wolność Arcachu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wank, Ogrodzenie z setek tablic rejestracyjnych Azerbejdżańskiej SRR (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Budynek Ministerstwa Spraw Zagranicznych Republiki Górskiego Karabachu (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Plakat związany z uroczystościami 9 maja.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki z drogi pomiędzy wsią Wank a klasztorem Gandzasar (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:20, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki z drogi pomiędzy wsią Wank a klasztorem Gandzasar (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:43, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki z drogi pomiędzy wsią Wank a klasztorem Gandzasar (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:20, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki z drogi pomiędzy wsią Wank a klasztorem Gandzasar (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:11, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki z drogi pomiędzy wsią Wank a klasztorem Gandzasar (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki z drogi pomiędzy wsią Wank a klasztorem Gandzasar (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:57, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Budynek Ministerstwa Spraw Zagranicznych Republiki Górskiego Karabachu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (38).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 13:59, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki z drogi pomiędzy wsią Wank a klasztorem Gandzasar (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough to be a Q1photo, but my support is not strong --Michielverbeek 15:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:2014 Stepanakert, Plakat Sił Zbrojnych Republiki Górskiego Karabachu (02).jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:2014 Stepanakert, Plakat Sił Zbrojnych Republiki Górskiego Karabachu (02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Ram-Man 01:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 19:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Above some short cut, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 17:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Stepro 01:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 01:55, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 03:23, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (43).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:40, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Zgromadzenie Narodowe Republiki Górskiego Karabachu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 05:51, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki z drogi pomiędzy wsią Wank a klasztorem Gandzasar (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 05:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki z drogi pomiędzy wsią Wank a klasztorem Gandzasar (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 05:44, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (40).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Cmentarz obok klasztoru Gandzasar (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:26, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Fontanna na placu imienia Stepana Szaumiana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality Ram-Man 16:29, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wank, Hotel Eclectica (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (47).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (44).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Cmentarz obok klasztoru Gandzasar (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Cmentarz obok klasztoru Gandzasar (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 06:07, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Pygmy owl

Hi. You rejected my owl as the file size was too small and I have now increased it. Can you have another look please. Charles (talk) 10:36, 27 March 2016 (UTC). Thanks, that was quick. Charles (talk) 11:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC) Sorry for the yesterday delay. --Halavar (talk) 11:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Re: Armenia

Oczywiście nie uszła mej uwadze Twoja obfita dokumentacja z tamtych okolic, zwłaszcza że wybieram się w podobne okolice (środkowa i południowa część kraju). Mnie jednak średnio i mało interesuje kultura i ludzie w ogóle, a bardziej przyroda, w szczególności rośliny. Wyszukiwaniu nowych gatunków, siedlisk i ich fotografowaniu poświęcam się w całości. Mam z tego wielką frajdę, chociaż o samym fotografowaniu wiedzy wielkiej nie mam, a tym samym też sprzęt mam podstawowy mocno. Jako botanik wiem tylko co i jak kadrować by roślinę lub istotny detal jej budowy zaprezentować. Zastanawiałem się planując podróż jak wygląda wschodnia granica Armenii i możliwość podróżowania w kierunku Górnego Karabachu? Założyliśmy na wszelki wypadek, że nie będziemy w tamtą stronę się przebijać, ale skoro masz doświadczenia to proszę – napisz. Jak w ogóle wygląda granica armeńsko-azerska? Czy można przejechać do Republiki Nachiczewańskiej? Kenraiz (talk) 14:40, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wank, Ogrodzenie z setek tablic rejestracyjnych Azerbejdżańskiej SRR (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's a spot left in the air, but also for me, good quality.--Famberhorst 17:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (46).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wank, Szkoła (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Budynki przy rondzie Placu Wolności.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Pomnik Stepana Szaumiana (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Budynek policji.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (42).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:24, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Cmentarz obok klasztoru Gandzasar (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki spod klasztoru Gandzasar (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:13, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Budynek Ameria Bank (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Cmentarz obok klasztoru Gandzasar (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki z drogi pomiędzy wsią Wank a klasztorem Gandzasar (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Szuszi, Meczet Yukhari Govhar Agha (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite noisy but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:50, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 11:42, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint John the Baptist church. Gandzasar monastery. Nagorno-Karabakh. View from S-E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 23:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Klasztor Gandzasar (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quick, before someone complains about the perspective distortion. --Ram-Man 16:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Cmentarz Noratus (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Cmentarz Noratus (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Cmentarz Noratus (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Cmentarz Noratus (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 05:40, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki ze szlaku turystycznego Dżanapar (48).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. Ram-Man 02:59, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Jezioro Sewan widziane z półwyspu Sewan (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Hajrawank, Kamienna płyta obok klasztoru Hajrawank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:50, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Hajrawank, Widok na jezioro Sewan spod klasztoru Hajrawank (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:26, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Cmentarz Noratus (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:55, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Cmentarz Noratus (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:41, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Cmentarz Noratus (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:15, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Kościół Świętych Apostołów (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 11:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Kościół Świętych Apostołów (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Chaczkary (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 13:04, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Deptak na półwyspie Sewan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Hajrawank, Nagrobek obok klasztoru Hajrawank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 11:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Kościół Matki Bożej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Kościół Świętych Apostołów (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 06:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Chaczkary (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 16:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki spod klasztoru Gandzasar (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Chaczkary (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Kościół Świętych Apostołów (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Kościół Świętych Apostołów (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Erebuni, Ruiny twierdzy (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:00, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Kaskady (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:16, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Cmentarz Noratus (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Cmentarz Noratus (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:46, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Klasztor Marmaszen (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please clone out the blurry bird (see note) --Cccefalon 04:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Cmentarz Noratus (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --~~~~

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Górski Karabach, Widoki z drogi pomiędzy wsią Wank a klasztorem Gandzasar (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great to see ISO 100 photos from you, Marcin ;-) Good Quality. --Cccefalon 10:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Mother of God church (Surp Astvatsatsin church) in the Sevan Monastery (Sevanavank). Gegharkunik Province, Armenia. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012 Gołkowice, Kościół Ewangelicko-Augsburski (01).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 03:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Wank, Ogrodzenie z setek tablic rejestracyjnych Azerbejdżańskiej SRR (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Klasztor Marmaszen (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Klasztor Marmaszen (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:29, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Klasztor Marmaszen (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:43, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Klasztor Marmaszen (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Kościół Świętych Apostołów (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft, but good quality though. --Smial 12:02, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Kościół Świętych Apostołów (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Klasztor Marmaszen (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Klasztor Marmaszen (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Stepanakert, Budynek rządowy Republiki Górskiego Karabachu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:58, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Dawny budynek administracyjny fabryki pończoch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be better with f/11 or f/13. --XRay 16:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Dawny warsztat fabryki pończoch (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wires are disturbing, but QI--Lmbuga 16:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Budynek na Placu Niepodległości (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Wires are disturbing, but QI--Lmbuga 16:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Klasztor Marmaszen (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:43, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Urząd Miasta (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Urząd Miasta (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Pomnik Wardana Mamikoniana (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Katedra Matki Bożej (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:36, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Budynek na Placu Niepodległości (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Dawny warsztat fabryki pończoch (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Dawny warsztat fabryki pończoch (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Chaczkary (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Cmentarz Noratus (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Klasztor Marmaszen (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 21:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Klasztor Marmaszen (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Kościół Świętych Apostołów (07).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2014 Prowincja Gegharkunik, Sewanawank, Kościół Świętych Apostołów (07).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Pomnik dziadka z dziećmi (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Sophia. Ohrid, Macedonia. Church tower..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 20:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Katedra Matki Bożej (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Katedra Matki Bożej (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Plac Vartanants (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:51, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Urząd Miasta (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Katedra św. Grzegorza Oświeciciela (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is some noise but still good enough I think. --Poco a poco 10:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Klasztor Marmaszen (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me now! --Hubertl 06:13, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Katedra św. Grzegorza Oświeciciela (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Matenadaran (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Pomnik Wardana Mamikoniana (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Urząd Miasta (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 16:15, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Frydek-Mistek, Fontanna św. Floriana na rynku we Frydku 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Frik in Matenadaran. Yerevan, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Multiple educational usages potential. -- Cirt (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Toros Roslin in Matenadaran. Yerevan, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Good value for multiple sites. -- Cirt (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Movses Khorenatsi in Matenadaran. Yerevan, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Encyclopedic value, usage on multiple language projects. -- Cirt (talk) 04:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Budynki mieszkalne, Ulica Szahumiana (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC) Please check the horizontal lines. You were standing straight in front of the building. Perspective change is acceptable, but see the line in front --Hubertl 12:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)  Done New, fixed version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 12:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC) Now it is ok for me! Thanks! --Hubertl 16:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Chaczkary (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Pomnik generała Andranika Ozaniana (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Urząd Miasta (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK now for me --Hubertl 11:55, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Goris, Widok na Stary Goris (Kores) (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Goris, Widok na Stary Goris (Kores) (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Sjunik, Chyndzoresk (025).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:20, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Kościół Zbawiciela (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 23:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vardan Mamikonian statue in Gyumri, Shirak Province, Armenia. View from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Seminary Dormitory in Vagharshapat, Armavir Province, Armenia. View from S-E..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 17:49, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Urząd Miasta (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Dawny budynek mieszkalny rodziny Dzitoghtsian (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Pomnik Aleksandropol (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Chaczkary (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pity those annoying background, but obviously could not do otherwise. good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Saint Gregory of Tatev in Tatev monastery. Tatev, Syunik Province, Armenia. View from South..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Brama Pamięci (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Dawny budynek mieszkalny rodziny Dzitoghtsian (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:31, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Pomnik ofiar trzęsienia ziemi z 7 grudnia 1988 roku (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Chaczkary (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Budynki mieszkalne, Ulica Szahumiana (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit noisy, but ok --Poco a poco 17:23, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Pomnik Aleksandropol (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 21:20, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Kościół Świętego Michała Archanioła (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful picture, but I feel a little short-cut top.--Famberhorst 15:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Widok na miasto i góry w oddali (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Verry interesting. Thanks to both of you. --Milseburg 21:58, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Pomnik ofiar trzęsienia ziemi z 7 grudnia 1988 roku (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. But please note that for modern monuments and buildings in Armenis, the template "FoP-Armenia" should be used --A.Savin 20:52, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Pomnik rosyjski (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Widok na miasto i góry w oddali (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Budynek na skrzyżowaniu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:00, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Kościół Świętego Michała Archanioła (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:48, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Dawny budynek mieszkalny rodziny Dzitoghtsian (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Kościół Świętego Michała Archanioła (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Fontanna do picia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Chaczkary (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 14:39, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Kościół Zbawiciela (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Pomnik Wardana Mamikoniana (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Pomnik rosyjski (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Występ dziecięcy (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Pomnik Aleksandropol (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:45, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Widok na okoliczny krajobraz (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could have been a little sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:21, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Budynek banku (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:41, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Former residential house of Dzitoghtsyan family, now a museum. Gyumri, Shirak Province, Armenia. Gate..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:26, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:34, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Mother of God church (Surp Astvatsatsin church) in Marmashen Monastery. Shirak Province, Armenia. Facade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Pierre André (talk) 20:14, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:35, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Widok na okoliczny krajobraz (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:32, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Szirak, Giumri, Kościół Świętego Michała Archanioła (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monument to the victims of earthquake of December 7, 1988. Gyumri, Shirak Province, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:27, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Useful. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 18:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Występ dziecięcy (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Występ dziecięcy (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 12:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Występ dziecięcy (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Występ dziecięcy (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:02, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Budynek banku (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
City Hall in Gyumri, Shirak Province, Armenia. View from N-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 17:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Re: Data w aparacie

Faktycznie, pomyliłem też i godzinę o równe dwie godziny. Lecę poprawiać . --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Stary budynek na końcu ulicy Miasnikiana (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:32, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Pomnik 50. rocznicy ustanowienia władzy radzieckiej w Armenii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 08:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gobi, kompleks Szambala (22).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gobi, kompleks Szambala (22).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Klasztor Hagarcin (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty good quality. --Peulle 16:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Klasztor Hagarcin (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:48, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Klasztor Hagarcin (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Klasztor Hagarcin (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Klasztor Hagarcin (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Klasztor Hagarcin (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 10:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Stary budynek na końcu ulicy Miasnikiana (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Klasztor Goszawank (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Ormiański mężczyzna na koniu obok klasztoru Goszawank (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Satisfactory for a dynamic motif. --A.Savin 14:32, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Występ dziecięcy (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:28, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Występ dziecięcy (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:53, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Klasztor Hagarcin (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Stare auto przy drodze M-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 23:07, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Budynek przy drodze M-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Tablica trasy turystycznej E2 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:20, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Klasztor Jukhtakwank (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportNoisy, but good enough.--Jebulon 09:50, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Kaplica pogrzebowa Mychitara Gosza (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noise, but acceptable for me--Famberhorst 15:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Klasztor Goszawank (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Klasztor Goszawank (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Klasztor Goszawank (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Kaplica pogrzebowa Mychitara Gosza (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Widoki z trasy turystycznej E4 (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Also noise, but barely OK for me --A.Savin 19:59, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Widok z klasztoru Hagarcin (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Występ dziecięcy (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:57, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Klasztor Goszawank (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit noisy, but QI for me. --C messier 18:11, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Tablica trasy turystycznej E3 (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok for me --Hubertl 06:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Klasztor Goszawank (09).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just passes. QI for me. Ram-Man 16:46, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Klasztor Goszawank (32).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:58, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Klasztor Goszawank (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:41, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Klasztor Goszawank (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Achtala, Klasztor Achtala (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be better with more contrast or black. --XRay 16:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Achtala, Klasztor Achtala (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:32, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Achtala, Klasztor Achtala (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 08:48, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Klasztor Matosawank (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:57, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Achtala, Klasztor Achtala (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Kaplica pogrzebowa Mychitara Gosza (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 15:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Hachpat, Klasztor Hachpat (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Hachpat, Klasztor Hachpat (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Hachpat, Klasztor Hachpat (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:36, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Hachpat, Klasztor Hachpat (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 20:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Sanahin, Muzeum braci Mikojanów (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Sanahin, Muzeum braci Mikojanów (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Sanahin, Klasztor Sanahin (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Hachpat, Klasztor Hachpat (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top of the tower could have been sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 15:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Minibus na przystanku przy drodze M-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Oh, a PAZ-672! --A.Savin 14:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Sanahin, Klasztor Sanahin (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Sanahin, Klasztor Sanahin (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Klasztor Hagarcin (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Achtala, Klasztor Achtala (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Gosz, Klasztor Goszawank (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Erywań, Erebuni, Ruiny twierdzy (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 13:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Ararat, Cmentarz obok klasztoru Chor Wirap (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Armawir, Wagharszapat, Seminarium duchowne (01).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Hachpat, Klasztor Hachpat (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:24, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (05).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 14:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2016

Вітаємо!

До 31 травня 2016 триває конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Змагання є міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!

Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) --IlyaBot (talk) 14:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Kościół Kwelacminda (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Rezydencja Prezydenta Gruzji (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:15, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widok z Mostu Pokoju na rzekę Kura i jej okolice (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Lorri, Sanahin, Klasztor Sanahin (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Park Rike (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:59, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widok z Mostu Pokoju na rzekę Kura i jej okolice (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Mikołaja Barataszwili (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Mikołaja Barataszwili (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could something have been sharper, but good for me.--Famberhorst 15:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (17).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentGood but a little bit too dark.--Jacek Halicki 10:53, 17 May 2016 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Please take a look again. --Halavar 12:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)  Done New, better version (with more contrast) uploaded. --Halavar 14:16, 18 May 2016 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 14:31, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint Michael the Archangel Church. Gyumri, Shirak Province, Armenia. View from S-W..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mkhitar Gosh funeral chapel in Gosh, Tavush Province, Armenia. View from West..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Holy Mother of God church in Akhtala Monastery. Akhtala, Lori Province, Armenia. North exposure..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Park Rike (06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Park Rike (03).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Park Rike (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 17:49, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Mikołaja Barataszwili (03).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Mikołaja Barataszwili (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Plakat umowy stowarzyszeniowej między Gruzją a Unią Europejską.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 11:47, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Prowincja Tawusz, Dilidżan, Stary budynek na końcu ulicy Miasnikiana (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:53, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Grigor chapel. Sanahin Monastery. Sanahin, Lori Province, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Artem Mikoyan monument in Mikoyan Brothers Museum. Sanahin, Lori Province, Armenia..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (minor perspective distortion though) --A.Savin 00:18, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (27).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Park Rike (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Park Rike (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Park Rike (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (11).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top not too sharp (tripod?) But good for me.--Famberhorst 15:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (21).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharpness isn't overwhelming but sufficient for QI IMO. --Code 15:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widok z Mostu Pokoju na rzekę Kura i jej okolice (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Hubertl 20:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Kościół Kwelacminda (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MartinThoma 13:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok for me --Hubertl 15:30, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widoki z Twierdzy Narikala (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok for me --Hubertl 15:30, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (25).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --ArildV 11:06, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (22).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Sobór Trójcy Świętej (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:00, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2014 Tbilisi, Plac Wolności (02).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Plac Wolności (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 00:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Akaki Cereteli i Ilii Czawczawadze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Górna stacja kolejki linowej i twierdza Narikala.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Here we go again - more noise than actually necessary. But still OK4QI --A.Savin 00:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (01).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Kartwlis Deda (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:57, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Ratusz (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (04).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Wolności z konnym posągiem świętego Jerzego (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:45, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Courtyard Marriott.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Darwinius 06:56, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Stary budynek parlamentu (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:51, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pierwsza Szkoła Klasyczna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:09, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Widok z okna na budynki i górę Mtacminda (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:52, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik Mikołaja Barataszwili (03).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikoloz Baratashvili statue in Tbilisi, Georgia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

•  Support --Pierre André (talk) 21:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:07, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pub Warszawa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 16:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

File:2014 Tbilisi, Płaskorzeźba na ulicy Mikołaja Barataszwiliego.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Płaskorzeźba na ulicy Mikołaja Barataszwiliego.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Budynek, Ulica Aleksandra Puszkina.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Wieża zegarowa (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:32, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Cerkiew na ulicy Ioane Szawteli (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:49, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik obok restauracji (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Plakaty wyborcze partii Gruzińskie Marzenie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Domy na Starym Mieście (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:19, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Wieża na rogu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Cerkiew na ulicy Ioane Szawteli (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Pomnik obok restauracji (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Il would top left some cutting, but good quality.--Famberhorst 15:38, 4 June 2016 (UTC) For me, much better. Thank you.--Famberhorst 17:28, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Ulica Ioane Szawteli (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:49, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Tbilisi, Cerkiew na ulicy Ioane Szawteli (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 June 2016 (UTC)