User talk:Gzen92/QI/2021

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Village des marques (Roppenheim) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Granada 06:59, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sapin, place Kléber (Strasbourg) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but this is not really a photograph of the Christmas tree, which we don't see most of, but the miniature houses and other decorations. -- Ikan Kekek 02:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Maurice - portail (Ebersmunster).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Thanks --Moroder 09:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Étienne (Dambach-la-Ville) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)  Oppose I can only see the roof of the church and some cloudy, dull sky. --Kallerna 09:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)  Support Really annoying to look at because of the light, but I think it's acceptable as a photographic representation of how the church looked that day. -- Ikan Kekek 06:21, 30 December 2020 (UTC)  Support IMHO it’s OK that we can see only the roof – the photo shows the situation of the church mid in the village. The light is not great, but OK. --Aristeas 10:53, 30 December 2020 (UTC)  Oppose Too strong noise reduction led to very low level of detail. --Augustgeyler 10:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)  Support IMHO it's acceptable.--Pierre André Leclercq 21:51, 30 December 2020 (UTC)  Support --Moroder 06:06, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Dieffenthal).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little bit blur to me. --Sebring12Hrs 09:45, 24 December 2020 (UTC)  Done Better ? Gzen92 10:56, 24 December 2020 (UTC)  Support Hopefully OK, for me it's QI. --XRay 11:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Village des marques (Roppenheim) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness could be better, the image is leaning in and CAs at the white letters at the left. --XRay 07:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)  Done Better? Gzen92 13:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)  Support IMO OK now. Thank you. --XRay 08:25, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camp des Gilets jaunes (Horbourg-Wihr) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 02:07, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camp des Gilets jaunes (Horbourg-Wihr) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:23, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Village des marques (Roppenheim) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camp des Gilets jaunes (Horbourg-Wihr) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:21, 4 January 2021 (UTC)  Oppose Overexposed sky - hard to look at. --Kallerna 22:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)  Support The sky is not overexposed. More detail could be extracted (ie [1]) but that's the author's choice; it's fine as long as it doesn't look flatter than what they saw. What does "hard to look at" even means in this context? --Trougnouf 08:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)  Support It seems now that QI photos can only be taken under the shining sun and with a blue sky --Moroder 09:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality.--Pierre André Leclercq 15:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)  Support The light is a bit harsh but the photo is good to my eyes, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 20:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Décoration - cigogne (Roppenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Illuminations - cigogne (Roppenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a perspective correction, please look to the background --Michielverbeek 06:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 10:02, 8 January 2021 (UTC) Good quality now --Michielverbeek 08:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Illuminations - tête d'ours (Roppenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 01:29, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Village (Aubure).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 19:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bonhomme de neige (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paysage (Colmar) (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (56).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carduelis carduelis (Chardonneret élégant) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 10:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC) Question: Why is this in the "unidentified Fringillidae" category? Is there another species that looks similar to Carduelis carduelis? Rhododendrites 15:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC) I don't know the birds. Thank you for the species I modify. Gzen92 10:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 12:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourgeon de Magnolia (Magnolia) sous la neige (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:42, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Héron cendré (Ardea cinerea) (07).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image! Good IQ. --Etaped 13:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calvaire (Pfaffenheim) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville (Pfaffenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:38, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame du Schauenberg - intérieur - retable (Pfaffenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some blown areas on the left but good overall, especially in the depiction of the altarpiece itself. -- Ikan Kekek 08:53, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Martin (Pfaffenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 13:58, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin de croix (Pfaffenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Croix (Pfaffenheim) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:54, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Notre-Dame du Schauenberg - intérieur - orgue (Pfaffenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:42, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lézard (Lacertidae) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanile (Ronchamp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 15:42, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue des Écoles (Colmar) (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. nice --Christian Ferrer 16:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue des Écoles (Colmar) (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:57, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Héron cendré (Ardea cinerea) (08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice DOF --Discostu 20:31, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Crocus de Tommasini (Crocus tommasinianus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:36, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mouton femelle (Trois-Épis) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:24, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygne tuberculé (Cygnus olor) (Marckolsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:38, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture sur la gare (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 10:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture sur la gare (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:26, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture sur la gare (Colmar) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centrale hydroélectrique (Marckolsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:54, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture sur la gare (Strasbourg) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Discostu 09:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture sur la gare (Strasbourg) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:20, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Jebsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:57, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sculpture sur la gare (Colmar) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:16, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collectivité européenne d'Alsace (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:39, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collectivité européenne d'Alsace - affiche (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collectivité européenne d'Alsace - Alsace (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collectivité européenne d'Alsace - ombre (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont du boulevard Saint-Pierre (Colmar) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourdon terrestre (Bombus terrestris) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:04, 23 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 23 April 2021 (UTC) I am quite sure it's Bombus terrestris, you could categorize it as such. --Nefronus 14:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:08, 23 April 2021 (UTC) Thank you. Gzen92 15:44, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anémone sylvie (Anemone nemorosa) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:48, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulipe de Grengiols (Tulipa grengiolensis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:32, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abeille (Anthophila) sur une fleur (Prunus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fleur (Prunus) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fleur (Prunus) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc rue Saint-Josse (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too wide crop in the foreground. --Tuxyso 21:43, 22 April 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks. Gzen92 07:13, 26 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:37, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collectivité européenne d'Alsace - Alsace (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Is there FOP in Alsace --Moroder 08:17, 29 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. (FOP in France is CPI) --F. Riedelio 06:16, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la Première Guerre mondiale (Widensolen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:46, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la Seconde Guerre mondiale (Fortschwihr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:44, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mairie (Fortschwihr).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borne (Marckolsheim - Artzenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me.--Fischer.H 17:23, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygne tuberculé et juvéniles (Cygnus olor).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:47, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygne tuberculé (Cygnus olor) qui plonge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:30, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia) (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lézard des souches (Lacerta agilis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC) nice image, but should identify species --Charlesjsharp 17:43, 28 May 2021 (UTC) Identified now. This is clearly sand lizard (Lacerta agilis) --George Chernilevsky 18:48, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (58).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. ---Lmbuga 10:58, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (60).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. ---Lmbuga 10:58, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (61).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. ----Lmbuga 10:57, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Écluse 66 - côté aval (Marckolsheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (59).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 11:01, 31 May 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 10:19, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) - tête (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Oppose Poor exposure. --Remontees 22:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Good enough for QI. --XRay 08:07, 2 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Fine for me. --Palauenc05 10:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. I'm happy with exposure --PsamatheM 21:25, 2 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Nice photo. -- Ikan Kekek 07:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casemate le long du canal (Marckolsheim) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Oppose Poor exposure. --Remontees 22:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Good enough for QI. --XRay 08:12, 2 June 2021 (UTC)  Support I'm not seeing a huge problem.--Peulle 07:13, 3 June 2021 (UTC)  Comment OK except for some very strong purple CA on the branches in the light toward the upper right corner. Please fix those, Gzen92. -- Ikan Kekek 07:56, 3 June 2021 (UTC)  Oppose for now. -- Ikan Kekek 21:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC) I cut the top (easier) . Gzen92 06:35, 7 June 2021 (UTC)  Support OK. Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:00, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Escargot (Helix) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:45, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - cour intérieure - vers le ciel (Strasbourg) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:41, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fleur (Mandevilla).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 08:28, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papillon (Lepidoptera) (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papillon (Lepidoptera) (31).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 08:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la Seconde Guerre mondiale (Illhaeusern).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:17, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château d'eau (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardin des papillons (Hunawihr) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - cour intérieure - vers le ciel (Strasbourg) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 17:30, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - cour intérieure - vers le ciel (Strasbourg) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - cour intérieure - vers le ciel (Strasbourg) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - Couloir intérieur (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - cour intérieure (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - cour intérieure - plaque commémorative (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Char M10 Wolverine (Illhaeusern) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Domob 13:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - espace officiel (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 08:07, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - hémicycle - plafond (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - cour intérieure - sphère (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - cour intérieure - vers le ciel (Strasbourg) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC) why nominate 5 almost identical images? --Charlesjsharp 21:19, 17 June 2021 (UTC) Yes almost : two are symmetrical (one with sarburst), another a little off center, two more off-center at most (one with HDR). It's different renderings, I had taken many more photos. Gzen92 07:24, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moineau domestique (Passer domesticus) (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quite nice, but could you make the exposition (esp. the shadows) brighter? --Nefronus 17:44, 19 June 2021 (UTC)  Done It's better ? Gzen92 07:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)  Support I would make it brighter even more, the quality overall could be a bit better, but the scene is interesting enough to outweight that. --Nefronus 18:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - hémicycle (Strasbourg) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality imo. Do others think it needs perspective correction? --Nefronus 08:07, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - Cour intérieure - sphère - plaque (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:10, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - extérieur (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:09, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malachite (Siproeta stelenes) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support There's a blown area on one leaf, but the butterfly is quite sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 08:13, 18 June 2021 (UTC)  Oppose As Ikan Mentioned + I think the detail on the wings is somewhat poor (noise reduction?). Borderline quality at most for me, sorry. --Nefronus 19:29, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Weak  Support per Ikan. --Smial 12:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)  Question downsized? Gzen92 Charlesjsharp 09:39, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygne tuberculé juvénile (Cygnus olor) (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:07, 16 June 2021 (UTC)  Oppose one bird facing away --Charlesjsharp 21:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Nice photograph. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:25, 18 June 2021 (UTC)  Weak oppose Per Charlesjsparp + there should be more space on the right with the bird heading there (not well composed)… Nefronus 06:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)  Support --Commonists 09:57, 19 June 2021 (UTC)  Weak oppose Per Nefronus --Lmbuga 22:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)  Weak support The objections against the composition are correct, but IMHO for QI the photo is still OK. --Aristeas 07:33, 23 June 2021 (UTC)  Support If you slightly crop in to get rid of the downs, I'll support. --MB-one 20:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)  Done Cropping. Gzen92 08:57, 25 June 2021 (UTC)  Support Significantly better after the crop. Nefronus 21:31, 25 June 2021 (UTC)  Support per Nefronus - I think it's good enough now. -- Ikan Kekek 05:43, 26 June 2021 (UTC)  Support per Nefronus--Lmbuga 13:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)  Support per MB-one --GRDN711 15:58, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - cour intérieure - vers le ciel (Strasbourg) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (but there are already 5 other that look almost the same). --Nefronus 18:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Yes look almost the same (it's not forbidden I think), on June 26th I went there earlier, I was able to focus the shot without having the sun. Gzen92 15:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - cour intérieure - vers le ciel (Strasbourg) (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (but there are already 5 other that look almost the same). --Nefronus 18:30, 3 July 2021 (UTC) Yes look almost the same (it's not forbidden I think), on June 26th I went there earlier, I was able to focus the shot without having the sun. Gzen92 15:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - cour intérieure - vers le ciel (Strasbourg) (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parlement européen - cour intérieure - vers le ciel (Strasbourg) (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:38, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fisher Celebrity (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC) Categorization as “unidentified aircraft” is not useful for future utility of this image in Commons. The registration number and visible observation of the plane’s features suggest this is a “Fisher Celebrity” kit plane and there is a Commons category for it. Please correct the category. --GRDN711 02:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)  Done Categorization ok. Gzen92 12:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fisher Celebrity (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Type of air plane would be very useful --Ermell 19:40, 11 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:59, 11 July 2021 (UTC) Please correct category. --GRDN711 02:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)  Done Categorization ok. Gzen92 12:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 02:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kappa 77 KP2U (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good, but it needs a rotation ccw and please think about the perspective --Michielverbeek 16:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)  Done Rotation. Gzen92 03:52, 12 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC) Categorization as “unidentified aircraft” is not useful for future utility of this image in Commons. The tail reference and visible observation of the plans’s features suggest this is a “Skyleader200” kit plane and there is a Commons category for it. Please correct the category. --GRDN711 02:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)  Done Categorization ok. Gzen92 12:11, 14 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:29, 14 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 02:05, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cessna 208 après l'embarquement (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:01, 11 July 2021 (UTC)  Oppose I disagree. Categorization as an “unidentified aircraft” is insufficient. The aircraft model needs to be identified to be useful in Commons. Also, human legs dropping out of the fuselage seems odd to me. You just have to be patient and wait until the people leave before making your image. --GRDN711 02:08, 14 July 2021 (UTC) The plane was already in motion, the person moves away. Gzen92 12:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)  Support. Added one cat. I have no clue who came up with the categorization for aircraft models, but in the chaos below the "Cessna 208" category, no one with a shred of sanity will try to find an illustration that fits their particular need. "Unknown aircraft" is of course very poor, especially since the aircraft could be found with two mouse clicks via google based on the marking. But I think that inaccurate categorizations should not be the sole reason for rejection because of the in large parts chaotic category system on commons.--Smial 09:16, 14 July 2021 (UTC) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) Seen for google, I categorize the other photos of this day, thanks. Gzen92 12:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)  Support as the aircraft is now identified. The partial images of the people on the other side might be funny if you concentrate on them, but they're not a deal-breaker to me. -- Ikan Kekek 09:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Maurice (Ebersmunster) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Best version has been promoted, see File:Église Saint-Maurice (Ebersmunster) (3).jpg. This one's inferior to the promoted ones. --Hillopo2018 08:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC) I believe that we can name similar photos. Gzen92 12:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)  Comment Noisy sky like the others. -- Ikan Kekek 05:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)  Oppose IMO not sharp enough, especially the onion roofs. --F. Riedelio 16:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)--F. Riedelio 15:58, 23 July 2021 (UTC)  Done Noise ok, I think it's better. Gzen92 15:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. -- Ikan Kekek 23:36, 23 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 06:46, 24 July 2021 (UTC)  Comment I removed the vote by User:Hillopo2018 because this new user is not allowed to vote yet. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 14:19, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Maurice (Ebersmunster) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Best version has been promoted, see File:Église Saint-Maurice (Ebersmunster) (3).jpg. This one's inferior to the promoted ones. --Hillopo2018 08:50, 21 July 2021 (UTC) I believe that we can name similar photos. Gzen92 12:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)  Comment So what if it's inferior to the others? The sky is a little noisy, though, so I'm not sure about how to vote. -- Ikan Kekek 05:46, 23 July 2021 (UTC)  Done Noise ok, I think it's better. Gzen92 15:01, 23 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Much better and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 23:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)  Support QI for me --Moroder 13:37, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support But I would crop at left and adjust colour balance --Charlesjsharp 08:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:01, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) - tête (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar et juvénile (Macaca sylvanus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:50, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar juvénile (Macaca sylvanus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaques de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) qui s'épouillent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:32, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montagne des singes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambre de commerce - beffroi (Lille) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambre de commerce - beffroi (Lille) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville - beffroi (Lille).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lille à ses fusillés (Lille).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 07:18, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieille Bourse (Lille).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:57, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Bergues).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But at least I would have cleared away the beverage can. --Steindy 09:09, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte de Paris (Lille).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:48, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa (Le Touquet-Paris-Plage) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I would cut off the traffic sign, however, as it disturbs the balance. --Steindy 09:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa (Le Touquet-Paris-Plage) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa (Le Touquet-Paris-Plage) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Sainte-Jeanne-d'Arc (Le Touquet-Paris-Plage).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:14, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chambre (Bouvaincourt-sur-Bresle).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 02:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus argentatus, Touquet-Paris-Plage, Pas-de-Calais, France (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok quality. --Charlesjsharp 14:03, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château (Dieppe) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue de la ville (Dieppe).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue (Bergues).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:34, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falaise (Le Tréport).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mont-de-piété (Bergues).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue de Ferdinand, duc d'Orléans (Eu).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Louis-Philippe (Eu) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Louis-Philippe (Eu) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Louis-Philippe - intérieur (Eu) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:12, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Jacques (Dieppe).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue et beffroi (Bergues).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 09:18, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Louis-Philippe - intérieur (Eu) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Louis-Philippe - intérieur - vitral (Eu).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:23, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Louis-Philippe - jardin - Apollon du Belvédère (Eu).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Louis-Philippe - jardin - Diane de Gabies (Eu).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Louis-Philippe - jardin - Diane de Versailles (Eu).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC)  Oppose I would like a CR, please. The composition is not optimum (to much space above), and the statue looks too greenish for me. Easily correctible IMO. --Jebulon 21:30, 18 September 2021 (UTC)  Question Could the green cast be due to light filtering through leaves? -- Ikan Kekek 06:07, 19 September 2021 (UTC)  Done I made some corrections. Gzen92 14:20, 19 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Better now, IMO. Do you agree ?--Jebulon 00:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canard colvert femelle (Anas platyrhynchos) (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:06, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canard colvert juvénile (Anas platyrhynchos) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canards colverts (Anas platyrhynchos).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Too much foreground for my taste, but still ok --Poco a poco 13:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mers-les-Bains vue depuis Le Tréport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The cranking in parts at the bottom are disturbing IMO --Ermell 07:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC) I cut the bottom. Gzen92 14:23, 19 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:21, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc d'Emonville - bâtiment (Abbeville) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc d'Emonville - bâtiment (Abbeville) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chalutier crevettier trémailleur (1981) dans la baie de Somme (Cayeux-sur-Mers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The horizonthal line is not straight. --Tournasol7 07:05, 22 September 2021 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 15:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC) Suggest you improve description and caption. Name of boat? Registration number? What kind of fishing boat is this? --GRDN711 13:24, 22 September 2021 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 15:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now, thanks :) --Tournasol7 19:51, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chardon (Cirsium vulgare).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:15, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phare (Cayeux-sur-Mers).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée du verre (Eu).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:18, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la Seconde Guerre mondiale (Abbeville).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The monument is on a slope but still I'd expect that the horizontals are horizontal, it looks tilted --Poco a poco 13:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)  Done I think it's better. Gzen92 10:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Yes --Poco a poco 14:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soufflage du verre - poisson en verre (Eu).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soufflage du verre - soufflage (Eu) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:12, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa (Mers-les-Bains).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:09, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villas (Mers-les-Bains) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:09, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villas (Mers-les-Bains) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Soufflage du verre (Eu).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourdon terrestre (Bombus terrestris) sur une échinacée pourpre (Echinacea purpurea).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 14:27, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Échinacée pourpre (Echinacea purpurea) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:08, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiosque à musique (Le Crotoy).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive (Le Crotoy) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive (Le Crotoy) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:10, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux frères Caudron (Le Crotoy).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 08:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la Première Guerre mondiale (Le Crotoy).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port Saint-Valery-sur-Somme (Saint-Valery-sur-Somme).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 08:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel-Dieu (Saint-Valery-sur-Somme).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:05, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc d'Emonville - pont (Abbeville).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coucher de soleil (Mers-les-Bains) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:32, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Pierre (Le Crotoy).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte Guillaume (Saint-Valery-sur-Somme) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte Guillaume (Saint-Valery-sur-Somme) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - autels à droite (Amiens).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - chaire (Amiens).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - chœur (Amiens).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 14:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fleur (Echinops).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:40, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - portail (Amiens).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:03, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - tour de chœur (Amiens) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - tour de chœur (Amiens) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Looks too bright to me for a church interior, but ok --Poco a poco 08:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - tour de chœur (Amiens) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Looks too bright to me for a church interior, but ok --Poco a poco 08:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canard colvert mâle juvénile (Anas platyrhynchos) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Échinacée pourpre (Echinacea purpurea) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts des Première et Seconde Guerres mondiales (Ottrott).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saints-Simon-et-Jude (Ottrott).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue des Tanneurs (Colmar) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar) (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue des Tanneurs (Colmar) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:33, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - plafond (Amiens).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grotte de Lourdes (Ottrott).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Sainte-Brigitte (Mittelwihr) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - tour de chœur (Amiens) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd apply some sharpening, looks too soft --Poco a poco 08:57, 4 October 2021 (UTC)  Done Better? Gzen92 10:57, 5 October 2021 (UTC)  Support I think so --Poco a poco 20:56, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fruit de marronnier (Aesculus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - façade (Amiens) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:56, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison d'arrêt - ERIS (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison d'arrêt - Escalier principal (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - lustre (Amiens).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison d'arrêt - Grille d'une cellule (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You have to choose what the subject is, according to the area in focus the grid, according the cats and desc what is behind it. It doesn't match. --Poco a poco 08:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)  Done Indeed. I modified the name of the file, the categories, the description. Gzen92 09:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:55, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison d'arrêt - Vue depuis une cellule (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:25, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia) (29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigognes blanches (Ciconia ciconia) (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 08:01, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison d'arrêt - Lieu de culte (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted in ccw direction --Poco a poco 11:27, 8 October 2021 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 11:32, 11 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daim européen - tête (Dama dama).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lapin (Leporidae) (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sanglier en bois (Kintzheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 13:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20e Obstgarde en pommes (Elsenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alambic (Elsenheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 12:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delphine Wespiser (Elsenheim) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:29, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delphine Wespiser (Elsenheim) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:29, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delphine Wespiser (Elsenheim) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delphine Wespiser en séance de dédicace (Elsenheim) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison d'arrêt - Cellule - porte (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Unfavorable cropping (the cable channel does not contribute to the image expression) --F. Riedelio 07:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)  Done Indeed, I cut. Gzen92 14:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 08:55, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia) (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delphine Wespiser en séance de dédicace (Elsenheim) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 23:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canard colvert mâle juvénile (Anas platyrhynchos) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin et juvénile (Myocastor coypus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:21, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:00, 5 Novezmber 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Wahlenbourg - entrée (Husseren-les-Châteaux) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 08:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin juvénile (Myocastor coypus) (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:42, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Wahlenbourg - entrée (Husseren-les-Châteaux) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:04, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collectivité européenne d'Alsace (Strasbourg) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:05, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponts couverts (Strasbourg) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 12:18, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patinoire (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (62).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 21:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 December 2021 (UTC)