User talk:Gzen92/QI/2019

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Préfecture du Haut-Rhin - nuit (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 12:53, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue des Marchands depuis le Koïfhus (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 12:31, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Champ-de-Mars - boule (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Champ-de-Mars - boule lumineuse (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Paris Orlando 12:49, 7 January 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:23, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de la rue Turenne - petite Venise (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Musicaline 09:14, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place des Six-Montagnes-Noires - hostellerie Le Maréchal (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:25, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portail de la collégiale Saint-Martin (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Enseigne (22 rue des Têtes) (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 11:52, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - intérieur - orgue (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok, although not 100% sure about the WB --Poco a poco 12:00, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - extérieur - cadran solaire (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support + --Poco a poco 11:45, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place Kléber - statue (Strasbourg) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - extérieur - détail (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rbrechko 16:05, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame - extérieur - rosace (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:50, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison au 15 boulevard Saint-Pierre (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:48, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison au 15 boulevard Saint-Pierre (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (36).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canard colvert femelle (Anas platyrhynchos) (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:50, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canard colvert femelle (Anas platyrhynchos) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Wahlenbourg (Husseren-les-Châteaux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Wahlenbourg - fenêtre (Husseren-les-Châteaux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Wahlenbourg - escalier (Husseren-les-Châteaux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Wahlenbourg - entrée (Husseren-les-Châteaux) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:19, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocher de près dans la verdure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:21, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Weckmund (Husseren-les-Châteaux) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Dagsbourg (Eguisheim).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glycine (Wisteria).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality photo IMO. Acabashi 11:21, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocher dans la verdure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments * Oppose Insufficient quality. Why use f/2.4 with daylight and still photo? --Moroder 09:44, 25 April 2019 (UTC)  Support Looks ok to me --Poco a poco 13:21, 25 April 2019 (UTC)  Support per Poco. -- Ikan Kekek 19:25, 25 April 2019 (UTC)  Oppose The perspective warp is too heavy for me; trees on both sides are leaning in.--Peulle 06:27, 26 April 2019 (UTC)  Done I corrected the perspective, Gzen92 07:22, 26 April 2019 (UTC)  Support OK.--Peulle 10:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)  Support Good for me. (Moroder is right that a smaller aperture would have been better, but the result is still OK here.) --Aristeas 09:55, 28 April 2019 (UTC)  Oppose per Moroder.--Fischer.H 08:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glycines (Wisteria) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood quality. --Manfred Kuzel 08:33, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château d'eau (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support null --Ermell 15:53, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château d'eau - porte (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 07:26, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château d'eau - sommet (Colmar) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:54, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château d'eau - sommet (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:53, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue de Bartholdi (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:08, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare - sommet de la tour (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:34, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poule - tête.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)  Question - You're sure that isn't a rooster? -- Ikan Kekek 17:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chèvre (Capra aegagrus hircus) (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vélo jaune à l'occasion du Tour de France à la gare (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vulphere 14:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Médiathèque André Malraux (Strasbourg) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 12:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare - couloir nord (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 12:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grue sur les quais (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Préfecture du Haut-Rhin (2) - avec lumière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:31, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Préfecture du Haut-Rhin (3) - avec lumière bleue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:40, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Préfecture du Haut-Rhin - avec lumière bleue - cour intérieure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 12:23, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigognes blanches (Ciconia ciconia) (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 11:06, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare - couloir nord (Strasbourg) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 11:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maillot jaune à la mairie (Mulhouse).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 11:04, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont-canal (Wolfersdorf) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:35, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Préfecture du Haut-Rhin (1) - sans lumière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportGood quality. --Cvmontuy 01:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)  OpposeI disagree This image is underexposed by at least 1/2 f-stop, probably one f-stop. --Smial 11:21, 15 July 2019 (UTC)  Neutral Smial is right that the image would be better (nicer) if lifted by about 1/2 to 1 f-stop. On the other hand, this seems to be a blue hour photograph, and the blue hour is dark, so one could argue that the brightness (darkness) of the image is just reality. --Aristeas 07:17, 17 July 2019 (UTC)  Comment It's a series of photos taken at one minute intervals (with File:Préfecture du Haut-Rhin (2) - avec lumière.jpg and File:Préfecture du Haut-Rhin (3) - avec lumière bleue.jpg), the settings are the same, actually the first is less exposed because no light on the building. Gzen92 [discuter] 06:13, 19 July 2019 (UTC)  Done I changed the brightness. Gzen92 [discuter] 09:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique Saint-Martin - intérieur - orgue (Tours).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique Saint-Martin - intérieur - chœur (Tours).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique Saint-Martin - intérieur - nef (Tours).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:37, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilique Saint-Martin - monument (Tours).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Gatien - portail (Tours).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 12:57, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de ville - colonnes (Tours).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 02:04, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel Goüin (Tours).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:47, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panneau commémoratif (Savigny-lès-Beaune).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks tilted in ccw direction --Poco a poco 19:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC) I modified it, is it better ? Gzen92 12:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)  Support Indeed --Poco a poco 18:04, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La Loire depuis le pont Saint-Symphorien (Tours) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:43, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autruche d'Afrique (Struthio camelus) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 12:21, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autruche d'Afrique (Struthio camelus) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigogne blanche (Ciconia ciconia) (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:18, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Girafe - tête (Giraffa camelopardalis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the animal, but IMO window in background disturbs the composition a bit --Michielverbeek 06:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Girafe (Giraffa camelopardalis) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gnou bleu (Connochaetes taurinus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality: sharp enough on eye level --Axel Tschentscher 18:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion d'Afrique (Panthera leo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:25, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lionne d'Afrique (Panthera leo).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The Panthera is unfortunately left cut off. For a right paw stands on the right photo. --Steindy 08:30, 21 September 2019 (UTC) I think it's still good when you crop it with 2/3ds and ave an spect ratio of 16:10 (see example) --D-Kuru 12:14, 21 September 2019 (UTC)  Done, thanks for the help, is it better ? Gzen92 14:14, 21 September 2019 (UTC) Now it's QI in my opinion --D-Kuru 14:23, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Savacou huppé (Cochlearius cochlearius).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:55, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maki catta et juvénile (Lemur catta).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you brighten the shadows a bit, both heads are in shadow and in that way it's hard to see any details --Poco a poco 09:22, 21 September 2019 (UTC)  Done It's a little better, Gzen92 14:37, 21 September 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panda géant (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panda géant (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panda géant (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 18:33, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panda géant - tête (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Potamochère roux (Potamochoerus porcus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Unfortunate foreground (distracting stones). --Till.niermann 09:01, 22 September 2019 (UTC)  Support Indeed the stones don't add anything to the composition but the main object is very sharp and that's why IMO it is a QI --Michielverbeek 09:12, 22 September 2019 (UTC) Weak  Support Also find the stones distracting to the point that tighter cropping (note added) might be preferred here. --GRDN711 13:58, 22 September 2019 (UTC) Weak  Support.The lighting is actually too hard for me, because it creates very sharp-edged shadows. On the other hand, the image looks very sharp. But while a too tight crop is a frequent and valid reason to refuse a photo QI status because parts of the object are cut off, I find the argument "too much around" absolutely counterproductive. This may be an important argument with FP, but with QI it's very secondary. A subsequent user can cut off at any time, what disturbs him, but never invent ("cut on") anything new. After all, a narrower trim doesn't increase the resolution either, and is only rarely a real gain considering the criteria for QI, because something is actually lost. --Smial 09:04, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhinocéros blanc du Sud (Ceratotherium simum simum) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 18:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhinocéros blanc du Sud (Ceratotherium simum simum) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 12:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rhinocéros blanc du Sud (Ceratotherium simum simum) - tête.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GRDN711 18:56, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suricate (Suricata suricatta) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 13:52, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suricate (Suricata suricatta) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 12:12, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zèbre de Grévy (Equus grevyi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:34, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - ferme du XVIe siècle (Chenonceaux) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:02, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - ferme du XVIe siècle (Chenonceaux) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - ferme du XVIe siècle - château d'eau (Chenonceaux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 11:18, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macaque de Gibraltar (Macaca sylvanus) (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 04:27, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - intérieur - salon Francois Ier - cheminée - détail (Chenonceaux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:09, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - intérieur - salon Louis XIV - cheminée (Chenonceaux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:11, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - intérieur - vestibule de Katherine Briçonnet - plafond (Chenonceaux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO the quality is good, but it is bit deformed (barrel distortion). Also the top is not really sharp, a higher f-value would have been better --Michielverbeek 10:18, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - jardin Russell Page (Chenonceaux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panda géant - tête (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Eye and nose in focus. IMO ok for QI. --Jakubhal 13:17, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - tour des Marques (Chenonceaux) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - chapelle - clocher (Chenonceaux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image, well composed. Pity the sky is so overcast, but that's authentic for the location - Bahnfrend 06:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - est (Chenonceaux) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image, well cropped. Pity the sky is so overcast, but that's authentic for the location - Bahnfrend 06:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Éléphant d'Afrique (Loxodonta africana) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Éléphant d'Afrique (Loxodonta africana) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château (Amboise) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments For me, it's a QI. Pymouss 22:21, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - chapelle Saint-Hubert (Amboise) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:07, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau et tour des Marques - ouest (Chenonceaux) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 15:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - parc (Amboise) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me--Armenak Margarian 20:19, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - tour Heurtault (Amboise).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 22:45, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau et tour des Marques - ouest (Chenonceaux) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:12, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château et tour des Minimes (Amboise).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image, but IMHO it needs more contrast; i.e. the lights should be lighter, maybe the dark tones a bit darker. --Aristeas 10:01, 1 October 2019 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 06:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Thank you very much! Much better, and IMHO really good now. --Aristeas 07:32, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Martin - horloge (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:06, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Martin - intérieur - retable de la Sainte Parenté de Jésus avec starburst (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:06, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - chapelle Saint-Hubert (Amboise) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - chapelle Saint-Hubert - intérieur - tombe de Léonard de Vinci (Amboise).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - chapelle Saint-Hubert - portail (Amboise).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Sharp and well composed (though I do wish the sunlight was highlighting the main relief). --Bobulous 21:22, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - fenêtres (Amboise) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:30, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Martin - méridienne (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Héron cendré (Ardea cinerea) (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise (Colmar) (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though a crop at the top might make sense --DXR 14:36, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petite Venise (Colmar) (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 16:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - fenêtres (Amboise) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but too dark --Poco a poco 07:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 06:12, 4 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - labyrinthe (Chenonceaux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think the photo is a bit too pale. Also the white balance might not be right. --Steindy 12:03, 27 September 2019 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 07:00, 1 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Seems okay now. Good quality. --Steindy 09:20, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - est (Chenonceaux) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 03:04, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pâquerette (Bellis perennis) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:42, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pâquerette (Bellis perennis) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canard colvert femelle (Anas platyrhynchos) (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygne tuberculé (Cygnus olor) - tête (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good --Poco a poco 07:11, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ragondin (Myocastor coypus) (39).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. You didn't feed it that cantaloupe skin, did you? -- Ikan Kekek 06:04, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts de la Première Guerre mondiale (Amboise).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 08:02, 3 October 2019 (UTC)  Done It should be better. Gzen92 07:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:22, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau - chapelle (Chenonceaux).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:17, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - gargouille (Amboise).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but it needs a cat about the subject --Poco a poco 07:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 06:43, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:59, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chenonceau et tour des Marques (Chenonceaux) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Why use HDR if the subject already has poor contrast with the cloouded sky? --Moroder 12:34, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygne tuberculé juvénile (Cygnus olor) (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison des Têtes - portail (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison des Têtes - sculptures (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:40, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place du 2-Février (Colmar) (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - intérieur - salle du Conseil (Amboise) (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose Sorry, not sharp enough. --Streetdeck 09:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC) I disagree. The photo is sharp enough. However, the dark area should be brightened up a bit. --Steindy 11:26, 3 October 2019 (UTC)  Support - QI to me. I don't care about the black area. -- Ikan Kekek 05:32, 5 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Quality high enough foir QI --Michielverbeek 07:02, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Support --Ermell 07:34, 6 October 2019 (UTC)  Support --Tournasol7 07:47, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Village marathon - Alsace (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Martin - intérieur - Christ en croix (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, despite the disturbing information sheet on the mensa -- Spurzem 10:06, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Martin - intérieur - orgue du chœur - clavier (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:07, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château - chapelle Saint-Hubert (Amboise) (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks washed out, can you please darken the shadows? --Poco a poco 07:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)  Done It should be better. Gzen92 06:18, 4 October 2019 (UTC) The curves look better but now you tilted it --Poco a poco 08:26, 4 October 2019 (UTC)  Done Sorry. Gzen92 07:42, 7 October 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commanderie Saint-Jean - chapelle - intérieur - plafond (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:28, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commanderie Saint-Jean - chapelle - intérieur - retable fermé (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:29, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commanderie Saint-Jean - chapelle - intérieur - retable ouvert (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 10:29, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collégiale Saint-Martin - cadran solaire (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:19, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commanderie Saint-Jean - chapelle - intérieur - sculpture (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:04, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commanderie Saint-Jean - chapelle - intérieur - vitrail (Colmar) (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:03, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commanderie Saint-Jean - chapelle - intérieur - vitrail (Colmar) (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:03, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bateau Doernel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carschten 00:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de Neuwiller - aile centrale - balcon avec garde-corps en ferronnerie sur le quai (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de Neuwiller - aile centrale - façade et toiture sur le quai (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de Neuwiller - aile sud - vantail de la porte (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:53, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de Neuwiller - aile centrale - vantail du portail d'entrée sur le quai (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Technically good --PantheraLeo1359531 14:59, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de Neuwiller - aile centrale - balcon avec garde-corps en ferronnerie et vantail du portail d'entrée sur le quai (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:07, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de Neuwiller - aile nord - vantail de la porte (Strasbourg).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The parts above/below the door are a bit blurry, but overall I think this is QI. --Domob 11:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:31, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hostellerie le Maréchal (Colmar).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The right side is leaning. --Steindy 00:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC)  Done It should be better, Gzen92 07:22, 28 November 2019 (UTC)  Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 23:52, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Saint-Nicolas-des-Marins - coupole (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it needs a slight clockwise rotation --PantheraLeo1359531 12:20, 2 December 2019 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 09:56, 4 December 2019 (UTC) Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 15:41, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phare du Stiff (Ouessant).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strong tilt ccw. --Milseburg 20:21, 13 December 2019 (UTC)  Done Gzen92 07:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 18:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 December 2019 (UTC)