User talk:Gotogo
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- 10:37, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Claude Lorrain. Landscape with Rebekah Taking Leave of her Father.png
[edit]Copyright status: File:Claude Lorrain. Landscape with Rebekah Taking Leave of her Father.png
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Claude Lorrain. Landscape with Rebekah Taking Leave of her Father.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Reminder
[edit]Hi Gotogo. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:29, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ok! Thanks for the links.--Gotogo (talk) 21:06, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Please do not over-categorize
[edit]Hi Gotogo. Have seen your latest categorizations added/changed to paintings by Carl Bloch. Most of them are fine, but please do not over-categorize. For example File:Carl Bloch - Italiensk morlille tager sig et hvil.png. There, you have added a link to "Paintings by Carl Bloch". It is not necessary. The painting is already categorized as "Genre paintings by Carl Bloch". That leads to the former category, and there is no need to have it twice in the same hierarchy. The category system can be complicated and we all make mistakes. Cheers Rsteen (talk) 04:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right of course.--Gotogo (talk) 06:21, 30 March 2023 (UTC)