User talk:Gauravjuvekar/Archive 1

Transfer

Thanks for doing that :) WhisperToMe (talk) 19:07, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Garfield Pythagoras.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The dashed lines seem too heavy relative to the others. This is most troubling where they touch the trapezoid's lower right corner. Otherwise good IMO. --Avenue 13:43, 26 January 2012 (UTC) CommentPlease re-evaulate-I thinned the dashed lines--Gauravjuvekar 16:03, 27 January 2012 (UTC) Thanks. On second thought, some of the labels are poorly placed sorry - they should be near the centre of the relevant triangle or line. "2" is the worst, the upper "c" and perhaps the "3" could also be improved.--Avenue 02:11, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Fixed----Gauravjuvekar 13:56, 01 February 2012 (UTC) Yes, good now IMO. --Avenue 08:53, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Electron shell 111 Roentgenium.svg

PostScript is very good for creating a new SVG file according to a mathematical specification, but it has very little to do with editing existing SVG files. I can try to edit the file if you want, but I can't do it any better than a lot of other people also could, and it will have nothing to do with PostScript... AnonMoos (talk) 05:05, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gauravjuvekar. You have new messages at w:Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop#Wide periodic tables. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Double sharp (talk) 08:06, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Hindi and Marathi translation requests

Thank you so much for doing the JAL123 English images!

By the way, if you are interested, I have some image translation requests in Hindi and Marathi.

• Hindi: Template:Requested_translations#English_to_Hindi
• Marathi: Template:Requested_translations#English_to_ma

Thanks, WhisperToMe (talk) 16:19, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Sure--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 16:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
On later thought, those are photos-What am I supposed to translate.
 Comment--Marathi is abbreviated as 'mr' not 'ma'.

Gauravjuvekar (talk) 16:56, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

1. Thanks for the tip!

2. Please translate the file descriptions. For instance File:Nariman-Point Bombay 2005.JPG, "Image of Nariman Point showing 1st famous Air India Building, 2nd Hotel Hilton Towers, in Bombay, India taken in year 2005 by Abhishek Madhani." should be in Hindi and Marathi, not just in English

Thank you

WhisperToMe (talk) 01:04, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Spoiny_English.svg

File:Spoiny_English.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eluveitie (talk) 06:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Suppression de "School newspapers"

Bonjour, je tentais de créer une catégorie. Cordialement, prosopee (talk) 10:09, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Mahuri.svg

I noticed your upload of this file and I'm a bit puzzled. The description says "Removed 16 unused definitions". But curiously the file is larger as before. -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 18:07, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Because the file is saved as an inkscape specific version. I grabbed it form the inkscape specific version of 503 kb. I reverted it as it shows two warnings during validation. Perhaps you could remove the defs and still have it properly validated. My upload was infact 6kb lesser(comparing to 503kb version).--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

BTW, shouldn't a version to avoid librsvg bugs be PNG? JPEG should be used for photographs, not graphics.-Gauravjuvekar (talk) 05:23, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes, no, Yes. ;-) All three formats have it's own advantages and disadvantages at Commons. The SVG is the best format for further changes and reuse, but it tends to be rendered with errors by librsvg. The PNG would be would be perfect for graphics to circumvent quality reduction. But this mainly applies to informative graphics. Otherwise you will get large files, have a size limit for thumbnails and the thumbs are blurry. The JPEG shows good quality thumbnails for articles, a good compression (bandwidth) and no real size limit for thumbnails, but it isn't perfect for reuse, since you loose quality with every change made. Thats why i had chosen SVG + JPG (at this time PNG support was even worse then now), while a PNG export could be made anytime. -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 08:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Gauravjuvekar

The lack of focus of the leaf in the foreground is somewhat distracting--Gauravjuvekar 09:30, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Is a tight crop at bottom is OK?

Now the file File:Neopithecops_zalmora_in_love_by_Kadavoor.JPG is at the consensual review.

Regards, -- Jkadavoor (talk) 10:03, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. A lot of my friends in Flickr are using Focus stacking, but mine are just handheld held shots. Will hope to do such works using all the required equipment in future. Regards, -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:50, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

QI reviews

Hint for you, DON'T TYPE IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS AND BOLD TYPE, IT'S CONSIDERED TO BE SHOUTING AND IT'S RATHER RUDE. I have fixed most of the images you tagged, but cannot upload them to Commons from this connection. I have posted links to updated versions in the hope someone will transfer them. -mattbuck (Talk) 13:59, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

intentional?

Hi Gauravjuvekar! Do you mean that my chances that you promote my picture are exactly as high as the likelyhood that I mounted on Colleoni to put the live seagull up there on his shoulder to take the picture? ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:13, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

my answer here

Twig overexposed

Twig overexposed--Gauravjuvekar 12:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

I think this is quite natural in the obelisk posture. He will be fully under exposed if I metered on the twig. BTW, I appreciate your excellent reviews after checking all the details. Regards, -- Jkadavoor (talk) 08:40, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Owlfly_Ascalaphidae_female_by_kadavoor.jpg

Here also, owlflies are active in nights; rest under the sun on day time to grab the heat.

I'm sorry, the twig was only one of the reasons. The overexposed(blown out) spot on its head(eye) and on its antennae, and the middle segments of its legs and the underside of its body(where the legs are attached) is also overexposed. Perhaps taking the shot from a different angle would have helped(My suggestion:rotating CW from the left along the horizontal plane(This may not have included its wings in the photo.))--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 10:07, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Agreed; I think you talked about the owlfly. But I thing only the twig is overexposed in case of the dragonfly: [1]. Just talking abut the difficulties in capturing such insects; no complaints about the opinions. Regards, -- Jkadavoor (talk) 10:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I talked about the owl fly. I appreciate the difficulties in taking such shots.--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 10:23, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Water drop 001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Water drop 001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:08, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thorn-in-ice-ronce-dans-glace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:33, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Higher res

Hello, Gauravjuvekar. You have new messages at Jkadavoor#Higher_res's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Jkadavoor (talk) 06:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Computer made

This images are renderings of a 3D model i create in Blender. Since it is a 3d model there is no easy way to convert it to an SVG and i have no way to upload the model itself since Commons does not accept a single format for 3D data. So the best possible option at the moment is to upload it as a lossless PNG image. -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 19:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Wow* this is a very featured image! -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 08:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

SVG validation

Hello Gauravjuvekar, You don't need update umpteen Files. A DOCTYPE is not needed, it is not even recommended: [2][3] Greetings -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 12:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

My updates are not just of doctypes. I remove the metadata tag all together, I also add <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>. Along with that, I'm also clearing unnecessary stuff generated by inkscape.

Ok, but encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"? is also not needed, because encoding="UTF-8" is always the standard value. -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 20:36, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pythagorean theorem rearrangement.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1,4-dibromobenzene.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The distance to their respective bond for the two bromine molecules is different. Otherwise a very good and useful SVG file. Saffron Blaze 08:46, 23 March 2012 (UTC) Fixed--Gauravjuvekar 12:27, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pythagoras similar triangles.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 12:42, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

File:BAB4ElerNight.jpg

The first dark sign, which you note, is the mirror part of the road sign on the right (which contains "Aachen / Eschweiler-West" an so on). It would be creepy, if it wouldn't be there ;-) Left side comes, right side goes. The second one, which lurks on the right side of the bigger sign out, is the "exit" sign (sorry, didn't found the correct english term for it), which marks the target of the highway exit - in combination with the three smaller, rectangular signs on the middle of the picture (everyone stands for 100m distance to exit). I'm not a friend of killing elements (i like those details, personaly) which are based on each other - otherwise the rest of the picture would contain only the light stripes :-/ I thank your for your comments :-) --Grunpfnul (talk) 12:51, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

I understand. My objection is that the corner cuts-through the headlight trails while the tail light trails on the right side are not significantly obstructed. Assuming this image was from a bridge, a shot slightly from the right might have reduced the problem. Better move it to CR and see what others say.(I like the slightly weird headlight streak on the innermost lane(white(headlights without car))).--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 13:31, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Further opinion

Hi:

The FPC, Delias eucharis need further opinion from you. Regards, Jee. Jkadavoor (talk) 05:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chalciporus piperatus LC0182.jpg

Hi, on May 18th you confirmed the FPCBot result for a voting, which should end on May 26th. Why? --LC-de (talk) 21:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

I just confirmed all that FPCbot had tagged with ready-for-review. Sorry, I didn't see the date. I thought FPCbot considered the date and tagged only those images whose voting period is over. Sorry again.--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 04:43, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

mr and hi translation

You could start a {{Assessments/translate/mr}} and a {{Assessments/translate/hi}} translation using content from {{Assessments/translate/en}} if you like. -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 13:16, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

I'll try but the code for {{Assessments/translate/en}} is wicked. Also, I've never done any substantial translation nor any edits to templates so I will need a lot of help with that. I can of course give translations for sentences but using any template syntax/code is extremely difficult for me.--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 04:49, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

I'd be happy to assist. It typically is simple sentences. "Featured" part is complicated in particular but I can assist you with that. Also feel free to try and make mistakes, I can correct those for you. :) -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 08:34, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Featured pictures(plural) is निर्वाचित तस्वीरें in Hindi, विशेष चित्रे in Marathi. Got it from the Highlights section on the main page for the respective languages.--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 08:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

You need to copy the code from {{Assessments/translate/en}} and translate it. If the code breaks I can fix it for you. -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 17:35, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Copied code, done QI part. Also changed {{Quality image}}(hindi)--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 18:52, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Nice. I have added the code for you to preview. You can see the effect on the page. :) -- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 13:38, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Soldering a 0805.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Soldering a 0805.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

POTY 2011 - voting - 1944 NormandyLST clean.jpg

Dear POTY-voter, some helpful people made us aware of a mistake in our candidate list. We regret the inconvenience.

• File:1944 NormandyLST.jpg was listed as a candidate but was never featured.
• File:1944 NormandyLST clean.jpg was a Featured Picture on Commons.
• Now, the only Featured Picture remaining is File:Into the Jaws of Death 23-0455M edit.jpg

Therefore we will add your vote to Commons:Picture of the Year/2011/R1/Into the Jaws of Death 23-0455M edit.jpg after voting is over, if you do not disagree and it is not yet there. If you don't want to have your vote transferred, visit Commons:Picture of the Year/2011/R1/1944 NormandyLST clean.jpg and remove your vote, either by editing the page and removing exactly the line containing your username or clicking the button.

Yours sincerely -- RE rillke questions? 10:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Decline

Can you please explain your reason for decline? I dont understand this... :( --WhiteWriter ^speaks 15:57, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Sure. The musical elements (top left corner) differ in the PNG and SVG version.(see image notes). Currently, the SVG is used as a replacement to the PNG (superior, other benefits of using SVG format, etc) meaning that the SVG has to be an exact copy of the original PNG, just superior(resolution). However, since the PNG and SVG differ, which version is correct(not superior) needs to be determined. If the SVG version is correct, I would like to see a {{Retouched picture}} explaining about the changes in that portion of the image.Please delete the image notes later.--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

 Done and fixed. All ok regarding me. --WhiteWriter ^speaks 18:08, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Resolved

I changed status to discuss and changed my vote. Thanks for clarifying.--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Re:mr and hi translation

I translated valued and quality but there's a problem.
They appear translated only in some examples(last two sample usages) but not in the main ones(sample usages ten and eleven).

Another unrelated problem with the current english translation. In the sample usages about only quality and valued(10 and 11), "If you think this file should be featured on Wikimedia Commons as well, feel free to nominate it.".

I don't think that as well should be there for we are talking about assessments on commons only. That's for pictures featured on other wikis but not on commons.

I suppose that should be "If you think this file should also be featured on Wikimedia Commons, feel free to nominate it." but changing it would require some template-code editing. --Gauravjuvekar (talk) 18:05, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

I have fixed the issue. Not sure why it happened but it is fixed now. :)

"As well" here refers to files that have an assessment of some sort that are not featured on commons - that said the language can be adjusted to "also".

-- とある白い猫 ^ちぃ？ 20:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Hanzal 001.jpg

I wanted modification this problem on Hanzal file in [4].

Please see again.

Jacopo188 (talk) 09:17, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes, the shadow in the middle is fixed. I mean th shadow on the left side of the right fruit. I think you might be seeing an older version of the image with the old note. Please purge your browsers cache.--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 09:19, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, Please see again.Jacopo188 (talk) 09:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Snub cube flat.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:52, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quality images logo.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. --PierreSelim 06:47, 31 July 2012 (UTC) It looks more like OL than QI to me. Mattbuck 22:56, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Icosahedron cell diagram.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 08:42, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Truncated icosidodecahedron flat.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 08:42, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mescaline Structural Formula.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you please slightly increase the canvas size on all 4 sides, but in particular at the top (the formula touches the frame). --Cayambe 14:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)* DoneGauravjuvekar 04:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Replacement of Mescaline Structural Formulae.png

I am sorry to say, but your SVG is of lower quality than File:Mescaline Structural Formulae.png. Please stop replacing it in de.wikipedia. There are a lot of low quality chemical structures that do need to be replaced: Category:Low quality chemical diagrams/expired, Category:Chemical images that should use vector graphics. --Leyo 19:09, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Could you please explain in what way is it of a lower quality?

I generally wait for my images to pass QIC before mass replacements--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 04:41, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Compare this and that: The high resolution PNG just looks better in terms of proportions, alignment and line thickness. BTW: Are you following the manual of style? Which software are you using? --Leyo 08:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC) PS. I don't think nominating structural formulae for QI makes sense.

Oh, I didn't use the ACS style. I'll redraw it.--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 11:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Which software are you using? --Leyo 12:14, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

ACD/ChemSketch--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 16:23, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Using the ACS style makes it a pure bond-line formula(methyl groups are not denoted by CH₃). Is this okay?--Gauravjuvekar (talk) 15:22, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

The manual of style says:

• The use of explicit methyl groups in the following cases is a stylistic choice, and both forms are generally acceptable on Wikipedia:
  • methyl groups attached to a ring or as branches in a longer carbon chain
  • methyl groups at the end of a carbon chain

I prefer explicit methyl groups unless there is not enough space or maybe in really large structures. --Leyo 15:35, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

How about this. --Gauravjuvekar (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

It looks good. However, please do not replace the structure with explicit methyl groups in de.wikipedia, because explicit methyl groups are preferred there according to de:WP:WEIS. --Leyo 10:03, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Problem with image of a flat truncated icosidodecahedron

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Truncated_icosidodecahedron_flat.svg

Thankyou fixed --Gauravjuvekar (talk) 05:28, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

File:US and USSR nuclear stockpiles.svg

File:US and USSR nuclear stockpiles.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— George Serdechny 16:18, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Gauravjuvekar, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

File:"Kitten".jpg

File:"Kitten".jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.142.141.57 10:40, 10 June 2021 (UTC)