User talk:FunkMonk/Archives/2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Sinosauropteryx with Dalinghosaurus.jpg

File:Sinosauropteryx with Dalinghosaurus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

92.234.201.12 11:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Rapetosaurus BW.jpg

File:Rapetosaurus BW.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Could you please take a look

Hey FunkMonk,

I remember that you have some experience dealing with self made drawings off dinosauria. Could you please take a look at File:Betasuchus by jonagold2000-d9vf4gw.png and nominate the file for deletion if it's inaccurate? I'm asking this because this uploader tried to include this image in the Dutch Wikipedia and some other wiki's. Thanks in advance! Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

It looks anatomically ok to me (the animal isn't known by much, so can only compare to other abelisaurs, which it is thought to be), but I've added it to a discussion at the dinosaur image review page:[1] FunkMonk (talk) 16:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Problem med renaming

Hej FunkMonk. Du står på listen med dansktalende administratorer, så det benytter jeg mig af:
Kunne du give os et godt råd hvis vi bliver ved med at få afslag på en 'renaming request' til en fil der ikke blot har en forkert kunstner som ophavsmand, men også en forkert titel.
Det er nok lettest blot at læse begrundelsen her på filens diskussionside:

c:File talk:Friedrich Overbeck - Joseph wird von seinen Brüdern verkauft (Casa Bartholdy in Rom) - Google Art Project.jpg

.. og læs også gerne diskussionen på denne danske diskussionsside: da:Brugerdiskussion:Brams#The_Selling_of_Joseph.
Ved enhver fremtidigt 'renaming request' ville den pågældende administrator vel blot trykke på dette link til Google Arts & Culture, og mene at alt ser rigtigt ud.

https://www.google.com/culturalinstitute/beta/asset/0wHXmZUn2XzTVg fra Google Arts & Culture.

Så hvordan ser situationen ud fra administratorside. Man går vel næppe ind i substansen?
-- Mvh PHansen (talk) 09:38, 7 February 2018 (UTC) (da:Bruger:PHansen)

Ser ud til du har ret, da det i hvert fald ikke ligner et billede af Josef som bliver solgt af sine brødre... Jeg tror måske det er nemmere at få billedet flyttet hvis du finder nogle flere kilder der entydigt bruger den anden titel? Og derefter kan du fremlægge sagen på Commons talk:Help desk. Jeg ville selv flytte filen, hvis ikke det var fordi der ser ud til at være en form for modvilje overfor det fra en eller anden, så er nok bedst at få en bredere diskussion ud af det. FunkMonk (talk) 10:19, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

OK. Tak for et hurtigt svar. -- PHansen (talk) 16:14, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Live captive Carolina parakeet.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Live captive Carolina parakeet.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Túrelio (talk) 21:29, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Argentinosaurus silhouette

Please have a look at what I did with File:Argentinosaurus size with raised neck.png (now renamed) while removing your no-permission tag. I believe the uploader made a good-faith effort to resolve the problem, and given the PD-self source I think the CC0 licence can stand. Is that OK with you?—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:22, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

Yes, the problem was that the uploads used copyrighted art as basis, so if it call can be replaced, that would be fine. FunkMonk (talk) 07:10, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
Perhaps just delete the original version with the copyright violation? IJReid (talk) 19:33, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Prosthennops.jpg

File:Prosthennops.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Prosfilaes (talk) 21:41, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Title File:Chased By Dinosaurs Logo A Note from the Publisher This image May Be deleted as this Image Might Be Under Copyright. This image was from Amazon so it might be free. I have Cheeked with an Amazon Employee.jpg

I mentioned i asked for permission in the title from a customer service thing one day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubblesorg (talk • contribs) 23:35, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Amazon does not own the copyright, the creators of the series do. FunkMonk (talk) 23:48, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

File:NickiMinaj1.png

File:NickiMinaj1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

BevinKacon (talk) 19:26, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Haifa in Abu Dhabi.JPG

File:Haifa in Abu Dhabi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fata Anik (talk) 07:02, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

/* About the new image of "Saltriosaurus" */

What poin of I buy It you not understand? I understand if it weren´t enougth probes, but Anyway i´m gonna say the Author, who has a Wikipedia Account also to talk with you (If you don´t believe, if the Same Guy Whou Upload The picture "Life restoration of Caihong juji (Without crest)") https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caihong#/media/File:Caihong_,_life_restoration.jpg Lucas-Attwell Yewtharaptor(talk) 1:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

You can't point to a Facebook comments section in Spanish as evidence for anything, it has to be much clearer and more permanent than that. FunkMonk (talk) 16:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC)

Gastornis + Leptictidium

Hi. A lot of scientific restitutions are shown in a lot of different sites, all inspired by each other. And basically, by the illustrations of the scientific articles describing fossils. We are not in the field of artistic creation but in that of scientific compilation, as when our texts quote our sources in the articles. But do what you mean right. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 11:00, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Saltriosaurus image

I gave the user the permission to upload the image Lucas-Attwell (talk) 23:10, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

It just needs to be very clear in the file. Best would be to send an OTRS permission.[2] FunkMonk (talk) 04:14, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:10, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Mumia graffiti.jpg

File:Mumia graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

B dash (talk) 08:46, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Problemer med at oprette underkategori

Hej FunkMonk
Forhåbentlig kan du hjælpe mig. Jeg har forsøgt at oprette en underkategori til kategorien "Category:Esbjerg". Underkategorien er "Category:Fortidsminder i Esbjerg Kommune", men jeg kan ikke få den til at blive placeret rigtig. Mvh.PHE77 (talk) 17:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Ser ud til at din kategori skal være under Esbjerg, men at du nu har gjort det omvendte (Esbjerg er under din kategori)? Jeg har har forsøgt at gøre hvad jeg tror du mener, så nu skal du bare placere din kategori på de kategorier og filer du mener hører under den. FunkMonk (talk) 17:29, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Mange tak. Det var præcis sådan jeg havde tænkt. Og tak for den hurtige hjælp, så vil jeg begynde at tilføje billeder til kategorien. Mvh. PHE77 (talk) 17:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Cool, bliver spændende at se! FunkMonk (talk) 17:41, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Jeg tænkte forresten om kategoriens navn ikke burde være på engelsk? FunkMonk (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Jeg kan godt se, at de andre underkategorier er på engelsk, så den burde jo faktisk være på engelsk, hvis det er almindelig praksis. Jeg kan se, at en bot User:ErfgoedBot allerede har indsat en engelsk kategori på billederne, men kategorien er endnu ikke oprettet. Skal jeg bare slette de danske kategorier igen fra billederne? Jeg kan måske få dig til at slette den danske kategori og oprette den engelske, så den bliver placeret rigtig? Beklager, hvis jeg har skabt ekstra bøvl med min wikimedia-dilettantisme. Mvh. PHE77 (talk) 18:01, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Det skulle være nemt nok at erstatte en kategori hvis du følger beskrivelsen her:[3] Jeg har gjort det for dig i første omgang, så det bliver nemmere en anden gang.FunkMonk (talk) 18:11, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Tak for hjælpen, men det er desværre lidt for teknisk for mig. Jeg er rookie. Jeg kan finde ud af at slette den indsatte danske kategori manuelt fra de 13 billeder. Hilsen PHE77 (talk) 19:30, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
Det burde blive gjort automatisk nu efter jeg indsatte den move request. FunkMonk (talk) 21:39, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
I dag har jeg oprettet den engelske side , men man kan ikke finde den som underkategori til . Den danske undermappe er der stadig. Har du mulighed for at hjælpe mig igen? Hilsen PHE77 (talk) 18:31, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Jeg har nu slettet den danske kategori. FunkMonk (talk) 18:36, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Velociraptor photo

Should we replace this. It has a inaccurate features.https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/80/Velociraptor_Wyoming_Dinosaur_Center.jpg--Bubblesorg (talk) 19:49, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Which features are inaccurate? FunkMonk (talk) 19:52, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Tail position and pronated hands--Bubblesorg (talk) 19:53, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

The hands are not pronated, one arm is mlifted so that the palm faces down, and the other hand is folded down,like those of a bird. As for the tail, dromaeosaur tails were stiff, but not inflexible.[4] FunkMonk (talk) 00:16, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Ah ok--Bubblesorg (talk) 16:12, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

New uploads

Is there a way to have this post-1923 photograph uploaded as fair use by any chance? If so, could you guide through the process?

I also wanted to make sure that I got this one right, so I'd appreciate it if you could take a look. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 21:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

The 1914 image should be fine, as for the 1957 image, perhaps something like the tag I used here[5] could work? You can check if the copyright of a US publication was renewed here:[6] FunkMonk (talk) 23:16, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for that second link. It works for academic papers too, right? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 11:03, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
I'm pretty sure I've seen some academic papers there (in any case, seems their copyright was rarely renwed). This link for periodicals might also be of help:[7] FunkMonk (talk) 11:33, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Turns out the 1957 photo from the link I gave you was nowhere to be found on this Archive.org version of the Quarterly covering the volume and article in question (p. 79-82). I just looked it up to find more information for the file's description (date on which the photo was taken, etc), but it simply wasn't there. Is that an obstacle or should I now assume that the ucpress.edu link was a different "edition" of this publication and then upload it anyway?
I also had this photo in mind (redirects to the Online Archive of California), but the description in the 'Rights Information' section below drew me away from it. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 13:10, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Hmmm, that does seem pretty strange. Might be iffy to upload it on an assumption. Are there other copies of the source online that could be checked? Sometimes images accompanying an article in a journal is placed way in the back of the issue as a plate... You might have to go for fair use instead, then. As for the other image, it also seems a bit iffy, since there is no original publication mentioned, it seems? FunkMonk (talk) 14:35, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Looked through the entire Archive.org document and I still couldn't find it. The other image can also be found here in the article's preface (no page number) and the caption says that it was taken in 1951. But it's cropped and the quality is much lower than the OAC one. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 19:09, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
As long as you show a link in the file source description to where it was first published, even if in lower quality, it should be fine. But yeah, the other image seems a strange case. FunkMonk (talk) 19:33, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Looks good? Fitzcarmalan (talk) 22:14, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
I think so, yeah. FunkMonk (talk) 02:47, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Good to know. Thanks again for the help and sorry if I keep bringing this up to you. It's just that uploading stuff around here can be quite an annoying experience for some. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 10:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
No problem, feel free to ask me about anything. Though I can't guarantee I'll know the answer, hehe... FunkMonk (talk) 11:15, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Crocodylus cataphractus 2009.jpg

Hi FunkMonk. Thank you for updating the description. Wouldn't it a good idea to also move the file to a more appropriate name? --Leyo 14:07, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Yes, now done. Do you know if it was captured locally? And you wouldn't happen to have more photos of the animal? FunkMonk (talk) 14:15, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Thank you. No, unfortunately, I don't have any additional information of that animal that use to live in a snake farm in Tanzania. I'll need to check if I've got more pictures. --Leyo 17:05, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
Checked now: I haven't got any additional pictures. --Leyo 21:46, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Alright. In any case, your photo is very valuable, as it is the only one we have that shows the species. FunkMonk (talk) 21:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

yeah the raptor picture is fine,

The picture was given to me by philip2001 through email. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bubblesorg (talk • contribs) 02:44, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

That is not enough, you need to do this: Commons:OTRS FunkMonk (talk) 03:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Ohmdenosaurus solved

Hello the picture ohmdenosaurus restoration.jpg has now proper licence, it public uploaded on Facebook of the artist. Here: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1970902823025381&set=a.112356122213403&type=3&theater

Emausaurus will had it also soon

At the best, Yewtha — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yewtharaptor (talk • contribs) 01:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

As already explained, that is not enough at all, Facebook posts are not stable, and I can't even see the post. You need proof on the Deviant art page or through email sent to Commons:OTRS, or by the artist uploading the images themselves. FunkMonk (talk) 01:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Deletion nominations without read

Drezewica Formation:https://www.deviantart.com/lucas-attwell/art/Drezewica-Formation-remake-755164983 (Read the begining of the description)

Emausaurus: https://www.deviantart.com/lucas-attwell/art/Emausaurus-and-ceratosaur-777406728 (Read the description)

Post the two on "Source" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yewtharaptor (talk • contribs) 13:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Ohmdenosaurus:https://m.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1970902823025381&id=100003170481141&set=pob.100003170481141&source=49&ref=content_filter (Read the description, literally a modification of Drezewica background)

User: Yewtharaptor User:Yewtharaptor

I don't know why I have to repeat it, but Facebook can't be used for this, and Deviantart needs to state the exact licence it is released under. I'm not going to repeat it again. FunkMonk (talk) 13:50, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

The DeviantArt licenses will changed, but the artist is occupied and cannot do it until de Saturday. Please, We need that you stop the deletion nomination due to time.

Ohmdenosaurus will be uploaded on DeviantArt. Open licenced.Same problem of time.Are legal updates.And Accurate: Helped by Scott Hartman.

Yewtharaptor (talk) 14:52, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

You should only upload Deviantart images here after they have a valid licence, not before. FunkMonk (talk) 20:52, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Update: Artist ask

There is some problems with the DeviantArt servers rigth now.

The images will appear with description(Due to the problems):

  • "Licensed By User: Yewtharaptor"
  • "Uploaded By User: Yewtharaptor"
  • "User Yewtharaptor has the rigths for the image on Wikipedia"

PD: Merry Chrismas! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yewtharaptor (talk • contribs) 18:44, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Yewtharaptor (talk) 19:18, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FunkMonk/Archives/2018&oldid=344827375"