User talk:Filipefirix

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Filipefirix!

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:00, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pequena Sereia- Cophenaga-Dinamarca.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 06:27, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion request

[edit]

Hi, i do not read portugese very well. But you seem to want te image to be deleted, because someone other reused it in commercial context. Sorry but then you did not understand the concept of free licenses at all. Yourself published the image 2011 under the "public domain" license. This explicitely includes any commercial reuse too. This your decision cannot be revoked later, also licenses may only be changed in another, which gives more freedom of use. It is no valide reason for a deletion request, that your changed your mind 3 years (!) later. Images are never deleted on such requests. As wikimedia commons dowes not allow images which disallow commercial use, you cannot upload new pics. However there licenses like Creative Commons (by the way the standard license in the upload wizzard if you chose not otherwise), which allow use by anyone but you can specify the kind of credits the reuser must give on reusing. - Andy king50 (talk) 06:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Ok Andy king50=====================
[edit]

Hello, this time I try to write in English, because I do not no the slightest idea of ​​who is going to read the messages, Chinese, Portuguese or English, I know perfectly well that when i add a photo and give my rights,i have an open mind that someone can do everything with the picture I posted.But in the wikipédia policy, said that is an free webpage of knowledge, but don´t say nothing about

to add your photos and other make money with your work and saying that it is their one work.That´s is my only problem, i upload the many pictures that wikipédia need´s to help the web site and the people who want to use their knowledge, not to the people who use the wikipédia for free to get rich with the work of others who helped on a free and good cause."Free knowledge for all"

Greetings Andy king50

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wy did you want to delete the photo?!?I don't understand what is the problem!? Stefan4 .