User talk:Clément Bardot

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Macroglossum stellatarum23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please sort file into categories. --AngMoKio 15:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC) *Well focused and good detail. It has now been categorised. --Jolly Janner 20:12, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Copyright Query

To whom it may concern,

I am emailing from a documentary company in England called Parthenon Entertainment and we would love to use the following image within our documentary series entitled Mystery Files.

Manhattan, New York.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Manhattan,_New_York.JPG

We were wondering if you own the copyright to this image as we would like to use it within our documentary for the rights for worldwide, all media and for perpetuity.

If you can email me at: emily.rudge@parthenonentertainment.com or call me on 01923 286 886 that would be great!

Many thanks,

Emily.

Copyright Query - FOLLOW UP

We have attempted to contact you regarding Parthenon’s right to use the Manhattan, New York.JPG as part of our documentary series entitled Mystery Files (and any subsequent reversions) as outlined in our previous emails below.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Manhattan,_New_York.JPG

It is imperative that we have authority from the copyright holder for the use of this archive material and in consideration of that authority, we would be able to pay the copyright holder a nominal fee upon signature of a release form.

The transmission of this series is due to commence shortly and I would be most grateful if you could respond to this email as a matter of urgency to enable us to put in place the necessary documentation.

Kind regards

Emily Rudge

emily.rudge@parthenonentertainment.com 0044 1923 286 886

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manhattan, New York2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could do with a bit of perspective correction, but good enough. --Mattbuck 04:29, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canard Colvert femelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Florstein 17:04, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! American International Building3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:02, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tircis France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Poco a poco 17:25, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lémur catta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. Good--Lmbuga 00:48, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! An Echinocactus grusonii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jkadavoor 05:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bellagio Las Vegas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rzuwig 18:01, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dead Horse Point, Colorado River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:36, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dead Horse Point 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Overexposed sky --Iifar 18:12, 2 January 2013 (UTC) I have tried to fix it --FF23-fr 00:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Bit odd, but acceptable. Mattbuck 07:09, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gondola at the Venetian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brahma blanc herminé noir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support a bit blown on the feathers but QI anyways --A.Savin 19:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of fire State Park 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 15:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oie cendrée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:59, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Valley of fire State Park 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, geolocalisation would be nice, though. --Coyau 20:29, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arc Héré, Place Stanislas, Nancy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective has to be corrected --A.Savin 09:34, 2 May 2013 (UTC) I don't really see how I can do :s --Clément Bardot 11:14, 2 May 2013 (UTC)  DoneI did it for you. In Lightroom: vertical -15, rotation -0,3. If you dislike, please revert. --Tuxyso 13:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Oh, thank you very much, it seems better now. --Clément Bardot 14:48, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Good quality now. --JLPC 17:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balloon of the Paris-Las Vegas hotel & casino.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 15:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Creeping buttercup during the Spring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steinsplitter 08:42, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:The Mirage Hotel, Las Vegas, 2012.jpg perspective

Perspective is still not OK. From your last version the correcture values in Lightroom 4 are -3 vertical and rotation of -0,5. Especially in the case of the hotel correction is very easy. It is important to rotate the image first and make a vertical correction after that:

1. Rotate the image that a vertical in the center of the image is exactly straight. In your photo there is a precise vertical in the center - perfect :)
2. Try some vertical correction values and look at the very left and very right area of the photo and examine if both verticals are straight (in the case of the photo I would take the left and right side of the fassage).

--Tuxyso (talk) 12:15, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I have fixed it :) --Clément Bardot (talk) 12:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Perspective is nice now. But there is still a remarkable CA (see note) at the left side of the fassade. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:04, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Las Vegas Strip at night, 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:03, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguane des Fidji2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Three sisters, Monument Valley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --A.Savin 18:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muddy Mountains, Nevada.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cimetière Américain Colleville-sur-Mer.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Yellow-bellied marmot in Yellowstone Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Rjcastillo 02:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Geyser Yellowstone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Splendid. Heuschrecke 23:24, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Prismatic Spring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nicely executed, glad I saw this feature so I know that these colors are realistic! --Royalbroil 03:43, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! White Tiger in Touroparc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Peafowl Courtship.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lionne, Abrets.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Charlesjsharp 21:07, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! N'Tami, Western Gorilla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mouflon Corse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emeu, Saint Martin la Plaine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 01:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loriquet à tête bleue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Distillerie de Whisky, Kirby, WY.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be image is a bit oversaturated. --XRay 04:28, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ara chloroptère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 16:02, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilic Vert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zygène diaphane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 13:09, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aéroport Agadir.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion d'Afrique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Crop a bit tight maybe. --NorbertNagel 20:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Notre Dame de Fourvière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:40, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiosque de l'Étang des Carpes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted a bit. --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:31, 11 May 2015 (UTC) I have made a correction --Clément Bardot 19:43, 11 May 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:51, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Thank you so much for uploading such excellent images! Please keep them coming! Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 15:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edmund Pettus Bridge, Selma, Alabama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Posterized parts. --Cccefalon 10:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC) I have made a correction about it. --Clément Bardot 10:22, 15 June 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now. --Palauenc05 21:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)  Comment @Palauenc05: It is good practice to let first the reviewer decide, if it is ok. I would appreciate, if you stick to that in future. --Cccefalon 07:10, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blue-throated macaw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:29, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bambusicole de Fytch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:27, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calopteryx Splendens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paulhaguet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Filename could be better.)) --XRay 16:15, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sumatran Tiger, Miami MetroZoo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very tight crop below but good quality -- Spurzem 20:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC) I made a slight correction about it --Clément Bardot 20:45, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyène Tachetée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 17:42, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Domeyrat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:21, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirse laineux, Auvergne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loutre d'Asie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:59, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Evergreen Plantation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok now for me. --Hubertl 20:29, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue de JFK, Tampa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 17:28, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plymouth Congregational Church's garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Now QI for me -- Spurzem 23:16, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ecureuil Roux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Western meadowhawk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Depth of field maybe a matter of taste here. Second opinion appreciated. --Code 17:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Tohopekaliga, Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:57, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goéland argenté, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice! --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:06, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port de la Cotinière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:07, 23 August 2015 (UTC) on ne peut pas éliminer ce vilain pneu ?--Jebulon 21:22, 23 August 2015 (UTC)  Done -Clément Bardot 16:04, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drill (Mandrillus leucophaeus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit soft, but ok --Poco a poco 16:55, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Old Diesel Pump, Alabama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:47, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Latter Branch Public Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:57, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collared finchbill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Green peafowl (female).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cercopithèque ascagne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorille des Plaines de l'Ouest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 21:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puy de Dôme during autumn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. -- Der Wolf im Wald 19:21, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Andrew Jackson, Jacksonville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:21, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Downtown Tampa, Florida.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:53, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Miccosukee.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 06:49, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de Condrieu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice shot. --Vitaly repin 15:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Man with his Alghoza.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taj Mahal from main entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent composition, of course QI. --Rftblr 20:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jaswant Thada cenotaph.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pushkar market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auto rickshaw in India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mahindra Tractor, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Superbass 15:50, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Man playing Ravanahatha in India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sahelion Ki Bari, Udaipur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very nice --Moroder 11:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Porte Héré (Nancy).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC) Scores:

1. Nancy Porte Here BW 2015-07-18 13-45-47.jpg: 0
2. Arc Héré, Place Stanislas, Nancy.jpg: +1 <--
=>
File:Nancy Porte Here BW 2015-07-18 13-45-47.jpg: Declined.
File:Arc Héré, Place Stanislas, Nancy.jpg: Promoted. <--

--DeFacto (talk). 19:21, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

--Berthold Werner (talk) 14:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Location?

Hi Clément - do you have a photo location for File:Lion d'Afrique.jpg, please? Is it natural, or captive? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 18:57, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heritage Inn Hotel, Jaisalmer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cobbler in Udaipur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bank myna, India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 17:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ephippiger ephippiger, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:34, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polyommatus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, although on the edge of too shallow depth of field, be careful. --Domdomegg 22:07, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Damier Athalie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 16:09, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Image use on social media

Bonjour Clément, I work with the WMF's communications team (as a volunteer, I edit as The ed17). I am curious to know if you would allow us to use your image on our main social media accounts on Facebook and Twitter. Please get back to me when you can! Thank you very much. Best, Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 18:50, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Ed. Yes you can use my pictures on your accounts. Let me know which one and I would be glad to have the link of your article. Thanks. --Clément Bardot (talk) 07:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I'm not sure where the link went, but I was looking at File:Rainbow Pathway, Miami International Airport.jpg. Does that mean we can use any of your images on social media? That would be great! We'd obviously give you credit in any post we do. :-) Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 21:33, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes Ed, you can use my images on social media. Have a nice day. --Clément Bardot (talk) 15:11, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balazuc, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:12, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pélican frisé.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Indeed, clear QI now --Poco a poco 09:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Arielle Dombasle, Musée Grévin.jpg

And also:

• File:Benoit Poelvoorde, Musée Grévin.jpg
• File:Brad Pitt, Musée Grévin.jpg
• File:Coco Rocha, Musée Grévin.jpg
• File:Franck Dubosc, Musée Grévin.jpg
• File:Inès de la Fressange, Musée Grévin.jpg
• File:Johnny Hallyday, Musée Grévin.jpg
• File:Line Renaud, Musée Grévin.jpg

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 04:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

File:La Joconde.jpg

File:La Joconde.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Lower part of painting is missing without reason, better versions available at Category:Mona Lisa. Redundant. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

BevinKacon (talk) 10:53, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

File:La Joconde.jpg

File:La Joconde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

BevinKacon (talk) 10:57, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Argus brun.jpg

Bonjour Clément, ce beau lycène n'est pas un Aricia agestis, mais une Lysandra : soit L. coridon, soit L. hispana. On pourra peut-être déterminer l'espèce si vous indiquez une localisation plus précise --LamBoet (talk) 18:43, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour, Merci beaucoup de corriger cette erreur. Effectivement, le sujet a été photographié dans le nord de la région Lyonnaise, il s'agit donc je pense de Lysandra coridon :) --Clément Bardot (talk) 05:48, 11 May 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour, oui c'est bien possible, mais je me méfie un peu parce que L. hispana est aussi présent par là-bas. Si ça peut aider, voici deux cartes de répartition : L. coridon, L. hispana. --LamBoet (talk) 17:22, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour, pas de doute. C'est bien le coridon :) --Clément Bardot (talk) 20:04, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Super. Et il (ou plutôt elle car c'est une femelle) est très esthétique. N'oubliez pas de corriger la légende et renommer le fichier (sinon je peux le faire aussi). --LamBoet (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour, Comment fait-on pour renommer un fichier ? Merci infiniment --Clément Bardot (talk) 18:38, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Bonjour ; en haut à droite à côté de "Voir l'historique" il y a un lien "Plus" > "Renommer" qui permet de faire la demande de renommage, puis un contributeur ayant les droits de renommage (comme moi) l'effectuera. --LamBoet (talk) 21:56, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Atelier, Musée du cinéma de Lyon.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ubcule (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

use of picture for text book

Hello Clement, sorry, my french is rusty, I trust you understand english! I am writing to ask for permission to use two of your images of great apes in a figure published by Oxford University press in a text book for undergraduates. The book is authored by Dr. Trevor Price, professor of Ecology and Evolution at the University of Chicago. The images are: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Cl%C3%A9ment_Bardot#/media/File:Chimpanz%C3%A9_commun.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Cl%C3%A9ment_Bardot#/media/File:Gorille_des_Plaines_de_l'Ouest.jpg

We would cite your name and the Wikipedia link. Please let me know if this is ok with you. Sincerely, Bettina harr AT evolbio.mpg.de

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moineau femelle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 09:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grenouille verte (Pelophylax kl. esculentus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 09:58, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duomo, Firenze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Great gate (Darwaza-i rauza), Agra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:33, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Palace, Lake Pichola, Udaipur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 23:05, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chavaniac - Lafayette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diwan-i-Khas, Fatehpur-Sikri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 19:33, 7 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 10:03, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roe deer in woodland, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Interesting that the deer does not stand out fantastically against the background but that is what deer want, the reason they are that colour so it illustrates the species well. --PsamatheM 11:44, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rooster portrait, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great quality on the head. -- Ikan Kekek 16:48, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rooster portrait, France.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rooster portrait, France.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apis mellifera, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:53, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dromedary in Thar desert.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gorges de l'Ardèche, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DSC 0922 Caloptéryx éclatant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lack of DoF --Wilfredor 19:26, 26 April 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 13:43, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieux-Port de Marseille, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tomer T 10:33, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame-de-l'Annonciation, Le Puy en Velay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some blurry leaves, but overall good quality. --Tomer T 10:34, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Misidentified quality image candidate File:Hespérie du dactyle (Thymelicus lineola).jpg

Hi Clément Bardot, I just tried to fix the ID of the butterfly depicted on your photograph File:Hespérie du dactyle (Thymelicus lineola).jpg. User:Charlesjsharp correctly mentioned that the orange tips on the antennae show that this is Thymelicus sylvestris. I am not an expert for butterflies, but it is obviously correct that Thymelicus sylvestris has got these spots, whereas Thymelicus lineola has not got them. Your image still needs renaming or it will be rejected as a quality image. Is this alright for you? Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 08:55, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your edit. I have no idea how to change the namefile, just need to put a rename template in the description ? --Clément Bardot (talk) 09:47, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

No problem. I just filed a rename request and added a note to the candidate list. Wishing you all the best --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 11:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

That's great. Thank you so much Robert --Clément Bardot (talk) 16:49, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hespérie du dactyle (Thymelicus lineola).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! European robin, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Though soft on top of head and chest. --Tagooty 04:20, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Chambord at dawn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 14:19, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indian Peafowl, Domaine de Pescheray.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:25, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait of an Indian peafowl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mouette rieuse (Chroicocephalus ridibundus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Chest is borderline, but head is sharp. --Tagooty 10:42, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Portrait of an Indian peafowl.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Portrait of an Indian peafowl.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dendrocygne fauve (Dendrocygna bicolor).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Martin-pêcheur d'Europe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:58, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dendrocygne fauve (Dendrocygna bicolor).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dendrocygne fauve (Dendrocygna bicolor).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mallard duck pair, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 14:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bruant zizi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice one, but I think you're required to provide geocoordinates or at least some location information on the file page for QI. Just add it to your file description. -- Ikan Kekek 16:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC) Done --Clément Bardot 12:08, 9 June 2022 (UTC)  Support Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek 19:45, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sarcelle cannelle (Spatula cyanoptera).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergeronnette grise (Motacilla alba).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 10:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ara chloroptère (Ara chloropterus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vincent Vega 10:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ibis rouge (Eudocimus ruber).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 10:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ara bleu (Ara ararauna).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vincent Vega 10:00, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sarcelle cannelle (Spatula cyanoptera).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sarcelle cannelle (Spatula cyanoptera).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grue demoiselle, Grus virgo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pélican frisé, Pelecanus crispus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loup gris (Canis lupus ).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 13:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vautour fauve (Gyps fulvus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wee Hong 04:07, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ours brun, Ursus arctos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:05, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suricate, Suricata suricatta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mouflon à manchettes (Ammotragus lervia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:32, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Raton laveur commun (Procyon lotor).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 21:56, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Loup gris (Canis lupus ).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Loup gris (Canis lupus ).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at 18 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Désert du Thar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 10:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vautour fauve (Gyps fulvus).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vautour fauve (Gyps fulvus).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Atlantis, The Palm, Dubaï.jpg

File:Atlantis, The Palm, Dubaï.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Burj Khalifa, Dubai.jpg

File:Burj Khalifa, Dubai.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque, Abu Dhabi.jpg

File:Sheikh Zayed Grand Mosque, Abu Dhabi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:03, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oscar fish (Astronotus ocellatus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmiste africain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 14:34, 27 October 2023 (UTC) Impressive! Can we have a geolocation, or could you specify the zoo in the file description? I think this is a possible FP, even though it's of a captive bird, but only with location information. -- Ikan Kekek 06:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC),  Done Thanks. Done --~~~~

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Palmiste africain.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palmiste africain.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Perche franche (Perca fluviatilis).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some more categories would be fine. --Ermell 21:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Gugalcrom123 15:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays and best wishes!

Happy holidays Gilles. I am honored to have discovered such photo talent this year. Your pictures are amazing! Clément Bardot (talk) 08:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays! Merry christmas! Best wishes for 2024! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Busard cendré.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 17:23, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cigogne blanche en vol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chevalier gambette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:14, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sterne caugek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Location category would be helpful. --Ermell 10:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC) : Done --Clément Bardot 09:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:20, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)