User talk:Erick Soares3
Arquivo atual |
---|
2024 |
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:57, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]
The image File:Artemis 2 Crew Portrait.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Artemis 2 Crew Portrait.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
File:O escândalo do petroleo.pdf has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : None.
And also:
- File:A História do Rei Vesgo.pdf ( Nominator : None | Reason : )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 11:46, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
INPE import
[edit]Hi! Sorry for the long delay, it took a while to get the domain name accepted on MediaWiki:Copyupload-allowed-domains. I've just started the upload, pictures will be available here: Category:Spacemedia INPE files uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot. vip (talk) 21:29, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Don-vip: Hi! It is all right! Sometime ago I had also uploaded several images related to the CBERS satellites construction (after I had found out about url2commons) in links like this one, but there are still several images that I didn't upload. Cheers, Erick Soares3 (talk) 23:34, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, the upload is done. 11 files couldn't be uploaded, their size is too big for Commons and it leads to a memory error when trying to upload them:
- 2022-05-09 - https://www.dpi.inpe.br/galeria/Ontario_NY_PA_OH_MI_AMAZONIA_1_WFI_20220509_044_008_L2_BAND4321.tif
- 2020-05-05 - https://www.dpi.inpe.br/galeria/GolfoMexico_AWFI_20200505_210_069_L2_BAND161514.tif
- 2017-04-25 - https://www.dpi.inpe.br/galeria/Remanso_PAN10M_20170425_153_111_B432_5mRecReg5M.tif
- 2017-04-25 - https://www.dpi.inpe.br/galeria/Remanso_PAN10MPAN5M_20170425_153_111_B432_5mRec.tif
- 2017-04-25 - https://www.dpi.inpe.br/galeria/Remanso_PAN5M_20170425_153_111_2_5m_Rec.tif
- 2017-03-12 - https://www.dpi.inpe.br/galeria/Brasilia_20170312a0416_Mediana_B151413.tif
- 2017-02-12 - https://www.dpi.inpe.br/galeria/Rio_PAN10M_20170212e310_151_125e6_B342.tif
- 2017-02-12 - https://www.dpi.inpe.br/galeria/Rio_PAN10M_20170212e310_151_125e6_B432.tif
- 2016-07-10 - https://www.dpi.inpe.br/galeria/SP_PAN10M_20160710e0923_155_126_e_164_126e7_B432.tif
- 2015-05-18 - https://www.dpi.inpe.br/galeria/Titicaca_AWFI_20150518_181_117_B151413_8bits.tif
- 2015-01-17 - https://www.dpi.inpe.br/galeria/Sobradinho_MUX_20150117_152_110e111_B876.tif
- Not sure if there's a way to upload them. vip (talk) 13:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I'll try a server-side upload request, never done it before, this is an opportunity to test. vip (talk) 13:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T366353 vip (talk) 13:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Don-vip Great! The only sad thing is that with images like File:Caparao MUX 20150628 150 123 B765.tiff it is not clear which satellite took them, so is hard to categorize it. Erick Soares3 (talk) 22:16, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T366353 vip (talk) 13:40, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, I'll try a server-side upload request, never done it before, this is an opportunity to test. vip (talk) 13:23, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, the upload is done. 11 files couldn't be uploaded, their size is too big for Commons and it leads to a memory error when trying to upload them:
File:VLS-1 V01 launch 1997.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 17:03, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Nova versão de arquivo
[edit]Boa tarde. Eu criei uma nova versão da imagem File:Dr Julio Queiroz Candidato a Vice-Prefeito de São Pedro da Aldeia 2024 - TSE.jpg e queria saber se ela vai atualizar sozinha ou vai ser preciso uma predefinição para chamar um administrador para trocá-la. KakuLogia+ (talk) 16:18, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- @KakuLogia+: boa tarde! A imagem atualiza sozinha, mas considerando que eles tem poses bem diferentes, é válido manter as duas lado a lado, e talvez até criar uma categoria para o candidato. Erick Soares3 (talk) 17:08, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- @KakuLogia+: eu criei a categoria Category:Files from Portal de Dados Abertos do TSE by party para ajudar na organização. Peço que ajude a popula-la no decorrer dos uploads (e que crie mais quando necessário). Erick Soares3 (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Erick Soares3: Ok! Farei isso na medida do possível. KakuLogia+ (talk) 23:29, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- @KakuLogia+: eu criei a categoria Category:Files from Portal de Dados Abertos do TSE by party para ajudar na organização. Peço que ajude a popula-la no decorrer dos uploads (e que crie mais quando necessário). Erick Soares3 (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Renaming requests
[edit]Hello,
I do not see that your renaming request of File:Bebeto Haddad Candidato a Prefeito de São Paulo 2024 - TSE.jpg is legitimate. Your rationale 4 "harmonization" is not fitting, rather, the rationales "Files should NOT be renamed only because the new name looks a bit better." (dubious, as uppercase writing hampers legibility) and the description of when criterion 4 is applicable ("Just because images share a category does not mean that they are part of a set. There are two scenarios that this criterion is designed for. First, certain complex templates (such as those that use BSicons or that display football kits) assume that the images used in them will follow a specific naming convention. Wikisource also uses a specific naming convention for the source files they transcribe. Second, files that form parts of a whole (such as scans from the same book or large images that are divided into smaller portions due to Commons’ upload size restriction) should follow the same naming convention so that they appear together, in order, in categories and lists.") would be applied. Please stop from editwarring against the renaming denial. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 19:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- I have replied in the image talk page. Erick Soares3 (talk) 20:43, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Posso?
[edit]Posso mover as fotos do Stuckert? Praticamente todas foram carregadas por mim. Se continuar nisso, minha watchlist vai ficar mais poluída do que já tá. RodRabelo7 (talk) 15:54, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- Tudo bem! Só vou corrigir uma má categorização que cometi por falta de atenção. Erick Soares3 (talk) 16:03, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
- @RodRabelo7: pronto! Erick Soares3 (talk) 16:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Hi, Erick. The file source links did not work for me and I suspect, that the license is wrong: your claim, that the logo has attribution-only license, seems unlikely. Can you give evidence for the license? Taivo (talk) 17:17, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Considering the bottom of the site (e.g. https://www.gov.br/inpe/pt-br/programas/cbers/cbers-30-anos) says "Todo o conteúdo deste site está publicado sob a licença Creative Commons Atribuição-SemDerivações 3.0 Não Adaptada." ("All content on this site is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 3.0 Unported license."), I have to agree. I don't know if the given license template was ever valid, given the vagueness of the "Todas as imagens poderão ser reproduzidas, desde que citada a fonte" statement. — Huntster (t @ c) 18:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Taivo and Huntster: The license was valid in the http://www.cbers.inpe.br/centrais_conteudo/galeria/ website (which, as it seems, it is finally down), not in the gov.br (which isn't the source). I understood "Todas as imagens poderão ser reproduzidas, desde que citada a fonte" as "it is ok to use, if you cite the source". Thankfully, Wayback Machine is working to recover the original source. Erick Soares3 (talk) 18:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- The gov.br url (which is indeed a Non-Deriv license) is only a modern development. Sites like inpe.br are way older, but it was decided the entire Brazilian government should use the new url. But the images shouldn't be understood as having the new license when they were sourced in the old url, or else a category like Category:Photographs by Agencia Brasil should be deleted. Erick Soares3 (talk) 18:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Translating the statement: “All images may be reproduced provided the source is acknowledged”. There's nothing against deriv or commercial use. Erick Soares3 (talk) 18:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- My opinion is that this statement is not clear enough in its scope to declare the associated images as freely licensed, but I admit I'm quite conservative in my approach to copyright issues. Taivo certainly has more experience in that regard so their views are more important. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- All right! And there's also the issue that they have copied the stuff from the older site to the new, while keeping the statement which contradicts the Non-Dev clause (example), which may resemble this case. Erick Soares3 (talk) 21:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- "Logo INPE © Todas as imagens poderão ser reproduzidas, desde que citada a fonte: CBERS/INPE – Divulgação." is not a valid license. Every file in Commons must be free for commercial use and derivative works. The license does not say anything about derivative works. I must delete the logo. Taivo (talk) 21:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- It does not say anything against commercial use or derivative works, just like this case. It only requests you to cite them as source. Erick Soares3 (talk) 22:16, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- In other words, Template:Attribution only license. Erick Soares3 (talk) 22:18, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- It does not say anything against commercial use or derivative works, just like this case. It only requests you to cite them as source. Erick Soares3 (talk) 22:16, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- "Logo INPE © Todas as imagens poderão ser reproduzidas, desde que citada a fonte: CBERS/INPE – Divulgação." is not a valid license. Every file in Commons must be free for commercial use and derivative works. The license does not say anything about derivative works. I must delete the logo. Taivo (talk) 21:36, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- All right! And there's also the issue that they have copied the stuff from the older site to the new, while keeping the statement which contradicts the Non-Dev clause (example), which may resemble this case. Erick Soares3 (talk) 21:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- My opinion is that this statement is not clear enough in its scope to declare the associated images as freely licensed, but I admit I'm quite conservative in my approach to copyright issues. Taivo certainly has more experience in that regard so their views are more important. — Huntster (t @ c) 21:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Translating the statement: “All images may be reproduced provided the source is acknowledged”. There's nothing against deriv or commercial use. Erick Soares3 (talk) 18:45, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- The gov.br url (which is indeed a Non-Deriv license) is only a modern development. Sites like inpe.br are way older, but it was decided the entire Brazilian government should use the new url. But the images shouldn't be understood as having the new license when they were sourced in the old url, or else a category like Category:Photographs by Agencia Brasil should be deleted. Erick Soares3 (talk) 18:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Taivo and Huntster: The license was valid in the http://www.cbers.inpe.br/centrais_conteudo/galeria/ website (which, as it seems, it is finally down), not in the gov.br (which isn't the source). I understood "Todas as imagens poderão ser reproduzidas, desde que citada a fonte" as "it is ok to use, if you cite the source". Thankfully, Wayback Machine is working to recover the original source. Erick Soares3 (talk) 18:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Erick Soares3 (talk) 15:19, 28 November 2024 (UTC)