User talk:Jynto

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Ephemeronium!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Commons:WikiProject Chemistry

Hi Ephemeronium. You might be interested in this WikiProject. --Leyo 15:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your valuable categorization work here on Commons!
What about adding a babel box to your user page? Like that people would know in which language they can contact you on your talk page. I just assumed that English would be fine. --Leyo 15:59, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, good idea. I've been meaning to create a user page for ages. I might get round to it in the next week or so. Ephemeronium (talk) 16:16, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

If you put there more than just a babel box, that's also fine of course. :-) --Leyo 16:24, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Your logo

The Wiktionary logo vote first round is almost over, and it looks like none of your logos are going to make it to the second round. The bookglobe logo has a lot of support from the Wiktionary community, and the Wikisaurus sub-project has no logo or main page at the moment, so recently I've been working on some style changes to Wikisaurus, which I intend to propose to the Wiktionary community in about a week or so. These include making the bookglobe logo the logo for Wikisaurus (Wikisaurus previously had a logo which was supposed to be temporary, which no one liked, and was removed from all Wikisaurus pages a while ago), making this the main page for Wikisaurus (feel free to edit it), changing the standard Wikisaurus header to the one found at the bottom of that page, and also, if you could provide a small image of just the red globe, changing the bullet points in Wikisaurus entries to look like a smaller version of the red globe. What do you think? --Yair rand (talk) 20:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Uh, this is the current account of m:User:Ephemeron, right? --Yair rand (talk) 00:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

I'd be delighted if you used my logo (and yes, you have got the right account). Of course I hoped from the start that Wiktionary would choose my logo, but now I can see, at least from the tally I did two weeks ago, that it's not going to happen - I guess I'll never be able to boast to my friends that I designed the Wiktionary logo. But you're offering me the next best thing, which is great. In fact it feels like a late Christmas present. Lastly here's the bullet point that you asked for. Thank you. Ephemeronium (talk) 00:39, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

I've started the discussion here. Time to wait and see if it goes through :) --Yair rand (talk) 19:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Citrulline-3D-balls.png is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure Image:Citrulline-3D-balls.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Edgar181 (talk) 14:02, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the quick fix! Edgar181 (talk) 14:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Can you do a molecule of phosphoglycolate?

Hi Ephemeronium! I really like the molecular models that you've contributed to Wikipedia! Since I don't know if you're still active here, I was just wondering if you could do a molecule of phosphoglycolate? It's just glycolate with a phosphate group attached. No pressure! It's not like your beholden to me or anything, but I just find your work... aesthetically pleasing (I've seen alot of sloppy models) for the loss of a better phrase. Anyways, keep up the good work!

Lee

Phosphoglycolate (3-)

Phosphoglycolate (2-)

Wow, I am honored to be receiving requests for my molecules! I have made these two images right away, showing different states of ionisation. I hope you like them. --Ephemeronium (talk) 19:17, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Dude... you are totally awesome! Thank you so much! Again, really, keep up the good work!

-Lee — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.40.217 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

 Info If you like to get more of such requests, just have a look at w:Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry/Image Request. ;-) --Leyo 00:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Just out of interest, what are you planning on using the image(s) for? I notice that phosphoglycolate doesn't have a Wikipedia article. --Ephemeronium (talk) 21:00, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I noticed that it doesn't have a Wiki page, but I'm using it to create a schema of photorespiraton in C4 plants. I hope to make it Wiki-worthy, and once I do, I will totally credit you ;)

Lee — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.40.217 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Incorrect orientation of amino-groups

In the pictures File:Carbamic-acid-3D-balls-B.png, File:Carbamic-acid-3D-balls-C.png, File:Carbamate-anion-3D-balls.png, you have neglected the free electron-pair of the nitrogen-atom that causes the hydrogen-atoms to form a trigonal pyramidal in stead of a trigonal planar structure.

In organic chemistry nitrogen never forms trigonal shapes. Only trigonal pyramidal shapes (where the yellow lone electron-pair is omitted) or tetrahedral in case of a positively charged cation.

In the case Carbamic-acid, the free negative elecron-pair is attracted to the positive double-bond of the oxygen-atom, causing the hydrogen-atoms to point away from the oxygen.

/Kemikungen (talk) 08:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

I was under the impression that nitrogen forms a planar shape in amides. See File:Acetamide-3D-balls.png and many more. This would be justified by the resonance structures of the amide. I don't think carbamic acid is an exception, as this depiction of its 3d structure shows it as a planar molecule. If it does turn out to be the case, I will look into redrawing them. What do you mean by 'positive double-bond'?

--Ephemeronium (talk) 12:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Ah, yes you are right. Amides have resonance. I forgot that because it is not shown in molecule models or structural formulas in the way usually done with organic nitrates (like nitromethane). However, I don't think this is the case with the carbamate-anion since the only free electron pair is already involved in resonance between the two oxygen atoms. /Kemikungen (talk) 12:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm still not completely convinced, since another model shows the carbamate ion as being planar. However I've uploaded a second version, which shows it as having the typical amino group structure. Feel free to do what you like with it. --Ephemeronium (talk) 17:49, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Aniline-3D-balls-C.png

File:Aniline-3D-balls-C.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 15:55, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Hiya Ephemeronium, I was wondering if you could do a molecular model for me (-: I want to use a couple of models you have already submitted (caffeic and p-coumaric acid) for my project poster but one of the compounds (Ferulic acid) I am using hasn't got one of your brill adaptations. I would very much appreciate it. Cheers Nicola

I'll see what I can do. It might be a while though. Ephemeronium (talk) 08:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Ok no worries, thank you anyway (-; Nik 12 May 2011

Alright, here it is. :-) I hope it's not too late for you to use it. Also, I checked my files and it seems I haven't done caffeic acid, so here's that one too. Ephemeronium (talk) 12:50, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Timestamp problem

File:Triphosphane-3D-balls.png states "2011-01-22" but was uploaded on May 31. Looks like many recent uploaded chemical-diagrams of yours have this same back-dated situation. Were they transferred from an earlier upload at another wiki? Or maybe hardcoded date in the block being cut'n'pasted? DMacks (talk) 15:18, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

That would be the date that I made them. They've been sitting on my hard drive for a while. Ephemeronium (talk) 15:32, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Gotcha. Thanks for clarifying. And thanks for contributing them! DMacks (talk) 16:12, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Oh, it's my pleasure. I'm just glad I have some free time now to do so. :-) Ephemeronium (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Superphane-3D geometry data

Is File:Superphane-3D-skeletal-sticks.png (and the related ball&stick model) an energy-minimized structure, or is the geometry based on experimental data? The en.wp article on the topic has a ref for the X-ray structure, which would be a good basis for all the carbon coordinates. DMacks (talk) 15:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

It's energy minimized, and probably not very accurate at that. I just push the 'clean geometry' button loads of times until it settles on something plausible. And whatever this reference is, I don't think I'm allowed access to it. Ephemeronium (talk) 12:42, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

File:4-Aminobenzoic-acid-zwitterion-3D-spacefill.png perspective

The third H on the N doesn't seem to be visible, and that detail is pretty important for what this diagram is illustrating. Maybe tilting the structure up a bit (so we can see more of the bottom of the amine?) might let us see the the back H peak out a bit? DMacks (talk) 15:12, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

It's on my to-do list now. Thanks for showing interest. Ephemeronium (talk) 13:39, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Comic Sans

Hi,

If you found another image using Comic sans, please add it to Category:Illustrations with Comic Sans text. It will allow to review if the use is justified and create derivative version if needed. --Dereckson (talk) 10:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Cyclododecane

Hi, Jynto: I have improved the article "Cyclododecan" in the German WP. To illustrate the structure of this molecule, I browsed in COMMONS and found your grafics. However, I'am not shure about the origin of your pictures, i.e. the drawing program. Are the drawings in agreement with the original experimental results (see my sources given in German WP Cyclododecan)? Best regards --Durfo (talk) 09:48, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Direct link is de:Cyclododecan, and I assume the images in question are File:Cyclododecane 3D ball.png and File:Cyclododecane 3D spacefill.png, illustrating (based on just our one available perspectie) an all-staggered/gauche conformation in an all-convex ("regular dodecagon") ring shape. To my eye, these two images have something like a C6 axis. I wonder if this is another case like #Superphane-3D geometry data above? Durfo, your article edits mention that it is D4, and cite (1960). "The structures of the middle ring compounds III. The structure of the cyclododecane". Helvetica Chimica Acta 43: 18–35. DOI:10.1002/hlca.19600430104. The abstract only gives mentions "syn–skew", which is consistent with the images. I don't have access to the article itself to see the more specific structure factors--are there actual dihedral angles or coordinates that would allow building a model of the specific crystal structure? DMacks (talk) 22:16, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Broken link to uploads cat

"Click here to see the category of images by me" on your userpage points to your old username, but the cat was renamed when you were. DMacks (talk) 21:46, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Echinopsidine-3D-balls.png is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure File:Echinopsidine-3D-balls.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Ed (Edgar181) 19:18, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

... and also File:Echinopsidine-3D-spacefill.png. Ed (Edgar181) 19:18, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

I think the fault is mine because you probably derived the structure from File:Echinopsidine.png, which I created with the same error, but have now fixed with File:Echinopsidine.svg. Ed (Edgar181) 19:20, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Piroxicam 3D ball.png and File:Piroxicam 3D spacefill.png

Hi.

I think there is a problem with this twto pictures. The left cycle should be a pyridine cycle, not a benzene one. Regards. --Rhadamante (talk) 00:34, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Fixed - thanks for bringing it to my attention. Jynto (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Azapropazone images

Hi Jynto, I just wanted to let know that I have marked two of your images as disputed. They are File:Azapropazone 3D spacefill.png and File:Azapropazone 3D ball.png. If you could correct them, that would great. Thanks. Ed (Edgar181) 18:11, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting it. I'll fix it when I get the time. Jynto (talk) 23:51, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Fixed too. Jynto (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Question

How do you upload molecules? Do you use a special program? 24.96.184.145 21:11, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Good question. I use a program called [Discovery Studio Visualiser http://accelrys.com/products/discovery-studio/visualization-download.php]. There are better ones available, but DS Visualiser is my favourite. It's free as well. Ben Mills has an excellent tutorial for that piece of software, which can be found here. Oh, and if you want your molecules to look like mine, these are the lighting settings that I use. Jynto (talk) 12:37, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:2,3,7,8-Tetrachlordibenzodioxin.svg

File:2,3,7,8-Tetrachlordibenzodioxin.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 07:05, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Ethofumesate-3D-spacefill.png

File:Ethofumesate-3D-spacefill.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 14:30, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Trichlorpropan.svg

File:Trichlorpropan.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 01:58, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Retene-3D-balls.png

Hi Jynto. Your image seems to be used in DOI:10.1021/es505684e. Just to let you know … --Leyo 09:39, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Cool! I love it when people use my images. It encourages me to keep making them. Jynto (talk) 13:06, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

3D ball and stick model request please

Could you please make a 3D ball and stick model for lisdexamfetamine, if you want to you don't have to. Thanks for reading. :) Clr324 (talk) 03:03, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Lisdexamfetamine

Here it is! There's a space-filling version as well. Are there any more that you'd like me to make? I do love making molecules. - Jynto (talk) 12:17, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Oh, okay :P guanfacine and benzhydrocodone. Thanks. :) Clr324 (talk) 18:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Guanfacine

Benzhydrocodone

Done, and done! You want any more? - Jynto (talk) 22:53, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

~~I can't think of any right now.~~ Desomorphine. ~~Sorry. :/~~ But I know we have to get rid of those spinning models because they're hard to follow and hard to understand (not user friendly) and they're low quality. There are a lot of those but I don't know where to find them. Thanks a lot though! :D Clr324 (talk) 00:11, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

I'm glad I'm not the only one who doesn't like those animated gifs. I'll try to replace as many as possible, but my first priority is still on articles that don't have any molecule yet. If you're having difficulty finding them, I suggest going to Special:ListFiles and typing the username of someone who created one of them. You'll find that there aren't that many molecule-makers on WP, and most of what you see comes from a few people. - Jynto (talk) 15:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

DS Visualizer Settings

Hi Jynto, seeing some of your fantastic work on Wikipedia, I also downloaded DS Visualizer. I would love to use the exact same settings you use (atom colors, lighting etc.). Would you be willing to share them? Is there a way to export/import these settings?. Specifically, I couldn't figure out how to get the atoms to be rendered in different sizes :(. Also, your image uploads sport this awesome color code legend - is this manual effort or do you use some kind of tool/automation? The result of my attempts will show here: DEPBT. Zalumon (talk) 23:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

• 
  Materials
• 
  Lighting (used for most of my molecules)
• 
  Just the 'from xtal' ones
• 
  Graphics

First let me say I am flattered that you'd like to learn from me. Here then are some of the settings I use. Find them under Edit → Preferences... → Molecule Window. The materials part is fairly straightforward, except dragging the sliders is woefully imprecise, and I wish there was a better way of doing it. You may want to experiment with their effects before you choose a style you like. I myself was originally tying to copy Ben Mills' style, until I arrived on something similar but distinct from it.

I got my lighting very similar to how Ben does his. Light 1 is pure white (255,255,255) and light 4 is dark grey (31,31,31). You can't easily see the arrow, but I put Light 4 at the equivalent position to Light 1, only in the opposite corner. In the 'from xtal' images (the ones based on scientific data), I vary the lighting a bit, to visually distinguish them. Lights 2 and 3 are slightly further out from the centre than 1 and 4, and they are both a lighter grey (63,63,63).

The graphics settings are pretty straightforward, but make sure the quality is set to ultra-high if it isn't already. The light blue background is just a shortcut I use to for making the background transparent, since there are no atoms of that colour.

I'll show you the atom sizes and colours tomorrow. But just to answer your question about colour codes, it is pretty much a text file that I paste from.

See ya later.

Jynto (talk) 02:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

The periodic table of colours

Alright, let's do atom colours. (To change them, go to Chemistry → Element Properties...) This is my periodic table of colours. It's modified slightly from the DS Visualizer defaults. I only changed the colours of all the p-block elements (groups 13 to 18) and hydrogen, making most of them slightly darker than the defaults (or in the case of carbon and nitrogen, a lot darker). For the sake of consistency, I also made fluorine yellow-green instead of the default blue, since all the other halogens are the same colour as their elemental forms. Other than that, I changed hydrogen from pure white to 240,240,240.

Carbon is 80,80,80; oxygen is 245,30,30; nitrogen is 60,80,250; sulfur is 250,235,0; phosphorus is 250,140,0; fluorine is 200,250,100; chlorine is 18,220,18; bromine is 180,40,20; iodine is 150,20,150; selenium is 235,180,0. That should be enough to get you started. The rest can be found using an eyedropper tool on the periodic table image. Everything aside from the p-block and hydrogen is left as its default colour.

The colour code that I paste into descriptions can be found in its entirety in the description of the linked image.

Now for the atom sizes. I do not suggest you stick with the default sizes, as those are all over the place. The defaults for selenium and arsenic are even smaller than hydrogen! Where possible, I go for the van der Waals radius. This property is not known for every element, but it is the closest we can get to measuring the 'size' of an atom as if it were a tangible object. My sources for the data are here and here. In cases where they disagree, the first source takes priority (hydrogen should be 1.2, not 1.1). The only exception is carbon - I made it 1.58, because 1.7 looked way too big.

Here are the values I use: (click to show)

• Hydrogen: 1.2
• Helium: 1.4
• Lithium: 1.82
• Beryllium: 1.53
• Boron: 1.92
• Carbon: 1.7, but I use 1.58 instead.
• Nitrogen: 1.55
• Oxygen: 1.52
• Fluorine: 1.47
• Neon: 1.54 (although it's not been often that I've done a neon compound.)
• Sodium: 2.27
• Magnesium: 1.73
• Aluminium: 1.84
• Silicon: 2.1
• Phosphorus: 1.8
• Sulfur: 1.8
• Chlorine: 1.75
• Argon: 1.88
• Potassium: 2.75
• Calcium: 2.31
• Nickel: 1.63
• Copper:1.4
• Zinc: 1.39
• Gallium: 1.87
• Germanium: 2.11
• Arsenic: 1.85
• Selenium: 1.9
• Bromine: 1.85
• Krypton: 2.02
• Rubidium: 3.03
• Strontium: 2.49
• Palladium: 1.63
• Silver: 1.72
• Cadmium: 1.58
• Indium: 1.93
• Tin: 2.17
• Antimony: 2.06
• Tellurium: 2.06
• Iodine: 1.98
• Xenon: 2.16
• Caesium: 3.43
• Barium: 2.68
• Platinum: 1.75
• Gold: 1.66
• Mercury: 1.55
• Thallium: 1.96
• Lead: 2.02
• Bismuth: 2.07
• Polonium: 1.97
• Astatine: 2.02
• Radon: 2.2
• Francium: 3.48
• Radium: 2.83
• Uranium: 1.86

Some advice

More advice

For every element lacking data (most of the transition metals, all the lanthanides, all but one of the actinides), I just use 1.8 as the standard. You will of course have to set all of these manually.

Now when you are editing atom sizes and colours, please please please DO NOT click the cross button on the Element Properties window or leave it by pushing the escape key. There is a bug in DS Visualizer where doing this will cause you to lose your settings. Only use the Close button at the bottom.

These sizes will show when you use scaled ball-and-stick models. That's the second option on the right next to CPK. You may notice one problem immediately when you do this - the atoms now look too big and the bonds too thin. It's difficult enough to see double and triple bonds at the best of times.

So hit CTRL-D to change the molecule's display style. Make sure no atoms are selected otherwise the changes will apply only to those atoms. Type 0.35 in both of the bottom two boxes. This gives (in my opinion) a well-proportioned molecule that is easy to understand.

Unfortunately there's no way to set these as the default, so you'll need to do this every time you save or render a molecule. Once you get in the habit of doing it, it's simply matter of selecting one of those boxes and pressing DOT 3 5 TAB DOT 3 5 ENTER. Remember that any new atoms you add after this will default to the old scaling; this can sometimes be difficult to notice, so always get in the habit of doing this if saving or rendering as a scaled ball-and-stick model.

The sizes you have set will also apply to your CPK (space-filling) models, so it's doubly important to get them right. I strongly recommend you do a space-filling model at the same time as you do ball-and-stick ones, since it's very little extra effort, and it means that editors have both to choose from.

Any further questions, just ask.

Jynto (talk) 03:18, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

File:3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran.svg

File:3,4-dihydro-2H-pyran.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 00:36, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Phenylephrine

Hi Jynto. I'd like to preface this by saying that I'm in no way a chemist, and my understanding of chemical diagrams is rudimentary to say the least. I am, however, an OTRS responder, and we've received an email regarding your image at File:(R)-Phenylephrine molecule ball.png, which is used on the Wikipedia article for the chemical. Apparently - and I'm quoting directly here - "the formula has a hydrogen atom in place of the methyl group on the nitrogen atom". I'm guessing you may have based this image on File:Phenylephrine.png, which also appears to be incorrect. An apparently accurate diagram of the model can be found here. Would it be at all possible for you to upload a new version of this file with the CH₃ molecule added? Many thanks, Yunshui (talk) 12:17, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Fixed it! Thanks for pointing that out. Factual errors like these do slip in from time to time, but I usually spot them myself. Turns out I'd managed to miss the error in all four versions of that molecule. Anyway, they're all fixed now. - Jynto (talk) 12:50, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

If you want to do more

• Nabilone
• Buprenorphine
• Tetrahydrocannabinolic acid (THCA)
• Chlorpromazine

Again, thanks for all you do. Clr324 (talk) 23:37, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

I trust these will be to your satisfaction. :-) Jynto (talk) 10:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

They are. Sorry for the delayed reply, I have things going on in my real life. :( Clr324 (talk) 22:09, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Desomorphine

Cannabivarin

Cannabidivarin

Cannabigerol

Tianeptine

Loprazolam

Is that too much? Clr324 (talk) 14:41, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• File:Tianeptine molecule ball.png
• File:Tianeptine molecule spacefill.png
• File:Tianeptine zwitterion ball.png
• File:Tianeptine zwitterion spacefill.png
• 
• 

Here they are. And sorry for the delayed response. I too have things going on in real life. Because of time constraints I speed up my molecule making by batch-processing them. Some of these (as you can see by the dates) already happened to be in the 'production line' when you requested them. If you need any in the future for reasons besides general wiki improvements, don't be afraid to ask. Otherwise I'd just add them to the back of the queue, but you'll see them eventually. - Jynto (talk) 20:33, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I really hope I am not putting stress on you. I hope the best for you and your chemical structure production. :) Clr324 (talk) 22:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Oh, on the contrary. I make molecules when I want to relax. Which means I don't always get time to make them but when I do I enjoy every step of the process, even the 'boring' ones. - Jynto (talk) 07:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

That is great to know. :) Clr324 (talk) 08:26, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Keplers supernova.jpg

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:46, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3-Aminobenzoic-acid-3D-balls.png

I added: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3-Aminobenzoic-acid.png

And this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3-Aminobenzoic-acid-zwitterion-nucleobase.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Just granpa (talk • contribs) 16:28, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Just granpa (talk) 16:32, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

File:4-Aminobenzoic-acid-zwitterion-3D-spacefill.png

File:4-Aminobenzoic-acid-zwitterion-3D-spacefill.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 13:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Some images with disputed structure

Hi Jynto. I have marked several of your images with {{Disputed chem}}:

• File:2-Phenylphenol-3D-balls.png
• File:2-Phenylphenol-3D-spacefill.png
• File:4,4'-Biphenol-3D-balls.png
• File:4,4'-Biphenol-3D-spacefill.png

Can you have a look and fix them if you can? If you have any questions about the rationale, please just let me know. Regards, Ed (Edgar181) 20:47, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Looking in Category:Biphenyls, I see that there quite a few more that have the same issue. Ed (Edgar181) 20:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Apologies for not getting back to you on this sooner. My reasons for doing this are two-fold. First, I use DS Visualizer to energy-minimise most of my molecules. This is usually accurate, it tends to prefer planar structures, but it will often build a molecule resembling the crystallographic data, if there is any. And it just so happens to make biphenyl rings coplanar (though there are exceptions, 2,2'-bis(2-indenyl)-biphenyl for instance). If I thought this was incorrect, I'd have to make an exception to the way I do things, just for that type of molecule.

Furthermore, both studies I found for biphenyl seem to show it as a fully coplanar molecule (J. Trotter, 1961 and Charbonneau & Delugeard, 1977). Are we to suggest that these crystal structures are wrong? If so, can you find me a crystallographic study that suggests otherwise? Then I will gladly incorporate it into my workflow.

Thanks

- Jynto (talk) 06:24, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi chaps. Here's the crystal structure of 4,4′-biphenol: Jackisch et al., Acta Cryst. 1990 C46, 919-922, CSD refcode DOHDPH02. While 4,4′-biphenol is planar in this crystal structure, there are co-crystals in which it is twisted, such as NISLOQ. It might be worth showing both conformations in the WP article, and adding a very short commentary with references. I also found the structure of 2-phenylphenol: FIFMAI01. Although there is disorder in the structure, you can see the angle between the planes of the benzene rings is 57°. Jynto, could you update your image of 2-phenylphenol accordingly? --Ben (talk) 10:44, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Ben. I've been busy lately, but I should be able to do it this weekend. Fingers crossed, and I should have them all done and updated on the same day. - Jynto (talk) 00:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

If you want to do more (2)

• Borepin
• Azonine
• Oxonine (Note. this molecule is not planar molecule)
• (2Z,4Z,6Z,8Z)-Thionine
• Pentazine
• Butalene
• Propynal

--CxHy (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Jynto,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Re-upload vs renaming

Hi Jynto, thanks for your images! If a file is uploaded having used a 'bad name' please use the move function to rename the file instead of uploading it again under a different name, thank you. Best, --Achim (talk) 13:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Butynes

Category:Butynes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 04:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Upcoming Wiki Science Competition

Hi, I am contacting all active commons users I can find more interested in the management of pictures related to scientific or technical topics. If you have time, could you take a look in Commons:Village_pump#Upcoming_Wiki_Science_Competition. Thank you. If were already informed, sorry to bother you.--Alexmar983 (talk) 08:06, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Epibatidine molecule ball.png is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure File:Epibatidine molecule ball.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 03:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Likewise:

• File:Epibatidine molecule spacefill.png

DMacks (talk) 03:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

• Fixed them now! Thanks for pointing it out. - Jynto (talk) 21:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
  • Thank you for the quick fixes! DMacks (talk) 01:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Dexamethasone 3D ball.png is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure File:Dexamethasone 3D ball.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Ed (Edgar181) 21:43, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Dexamethasone 3D skeletal.png and File:Dexamethasone 3D spacefill.png have the same issue. Regards, Ed (Edgar181) 21:45, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Done! Thanks for pointing it out. I also corrected three images of dexamethasone isonicotinate while I was at it. - Jynto (talk) 23:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick fixes! Ed (Edgar181) 00:14, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Furazolidone 3D ball.png is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure File:Furazolidone 3D ball.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 05:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

And likewise File:Furazolidone 3D spacefill.png. DMacks (talk) 05:55, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Done! Thanks again for pointing it out. - Jynto (talk) 17:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

And thanks to you as always for the prompt fixes and nice-looking images! DMacks (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Thianthrene-3D-spacefill.png

File:Thianthrene-3D-spacefill.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 05:55, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Thianthrene-3D-balls.png

File:Thianthrene-3D-balls.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 05:55, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Methamphetamine molecule from xtal ball.png is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure File:Methamphetamine molecule from xtal ball.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Mykhal (talk) 14:12, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Are you still active & reachable?

Hello Jynto, I wonder if you still active & reachable on Wikimedia Commons? I have a very important question! Hope for an answer! Regards, Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 22:31, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

File:4-hydroxybenzyl.svg

File:4-hydroxybenzyl.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 20:00, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Ammonium-carbonate-3D-balls.png

File:Ammonium-carbonate-3D-balls.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Thank you

For your molecular illustration efforts!

Your space fill images and all Images looks really good

Hi Jynto Your drawings are really nice, please tell me which software you are preferring to draw chemical structure images.

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:L-663536-3D-spacefill.png is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure File:L-663536-3D-spacefill.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --LegionMammal978 (talk) 17:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Also File:L-663536-3D-balls.png. For some reason the PubChem ref got mixed up with an n-butyl version of the compound, and so did File:L 663536.svg. I've uploaded a corrected structure to File:MK-886.svg. LegionMammal978 (talk) 17:28, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

I have moved it to MK-866. Greetings JWBE (talk) 08:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

File:2-Phenylphenol-3D-balls.png

File:2-Phenylphenol-3D-balls.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:59, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Tianeptine_molecule_ball.png inaccuracy

There's a mistake on File:Tianeptine_molecule_ball.png, the cyclic nitrogen should have a methyl group attached to it. Mounched (talk) 09:26, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Tianeptine molecule ball.png is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure File:Tianeptine molecule ball.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted. In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Marbletan (talk) 13:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Also, these images:

• File:Tianeptine zwitterion spacefill.png
• File:Tianeptine zwitterion ball.png
• File:Tianeptine molecule spacefill.png

Regards, Marbletan (talk) 13:21, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

File:Disodium hydrogen phosphite 3D ball.png

File:Disodium hydrogen phosphite 3D ball.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 12:15, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Sodium-bisulfate-3D-balls-ionic.png

File:Sodium-bisulfate-3D-balls-ionic.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 1.54.204.28.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

methylcarbamate

Hi Jynto, thanks for all the great models! The nice drawing of methylcarbamate looks good, but is the other way round from the formula above it - I lack the skills to swap it L-R, but think it would be more understandable if the two matched, Skihatboatbike (talk) 12:41, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Anthraquinone-3D-balls.png

File:Anthraquinone-3D-balls.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DMacks (talk) 09:35, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

File:C55-isoprenyl-pyrophosphate-3D-balls.png

{{User:Deletion Notification Bot/SDEL/headingless|1=File:C55-isoprenyl-pyrophosphate-3D-balls.png|2=unused disputed chemical image User:Alfa-ketosav Alfa-ketosav ([[User talk:Alfa-ketosav talk

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Alfa-ketosav.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:40, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Tianeptine molecule spacefill.png

File:Tianeptine molecule spacefill.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wostr (talk) 19:18, 27 August 2024 (UTC)