User talk:Electron/Archive 2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:London_Underground.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 03:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sandy_Jack_Sparrow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Powers (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion notification Category:Alcoholics has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Right name"

[edit]

It would be better to list a reason from Commons:File renaming so that nobody gets on you about moving files for aesthetic purposes only. – Adrignola talk 13:20, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


your Flickr-review

[edit]

Hi Electron, could you explain this edit from yesterday. Less then 20 hours later, the original image is "(C) ARR" at its Flickr source. --Túrelio (talk) 08:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I try to do my work well. Might be the Flickr's user have changed the licence. To say the truth I don't remember exactly... Is there the chance that is was my mistake, too. Regards Electron  <Talk?> 08:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So there has been no special agreement on behalf of you or the uploader with the rights holder to temporarily change the license from ARR to CC-BY-SA? --Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No. Now I have sarched the others pictures on Flikr by Jeremiah Christopher and they are mainly all under ARR license. So I can rather say that it might be my mistake. Nobody's perfect... :( Electron  <Talk?> 09:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks. I've speedy-tagged the image now. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thanks for the info and your intervention. Electron  <Talk?> 09:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
For what it's worth, I also had a look at the file yesterday (primarily because I had a suspicion that Adlek neuy may be a sockpuppet of blocked Flickrwasher Warholmuze), and I found the file to be correctly tagged (and contrary to Warholmuze's previous upload of the same file, this one comes from a legitimate Flickr account). So you did not make a mistake in your review. LX (talk, contribs) 09:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your confirmation. As I remember now it was rather CC-BY-SA or similar but I am not sure... Electron  <Talk?> 09:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm quite sure. If I'd seen an incorrectly licensed Flickr file from a suspected sockpuppet of a blocked Flickrwasher (which is what I expected, so I wasn't wearing my wishful thinking goggles), I would have made some noise about it. LX (talk, contribs) 09:48, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK. For additional confirmation I post the question on Flickr's file page -> http://www.flickr.com/photos/jeremiahchristopher/2155165442/in/photostream . Maybe the author will clarify it... Electron  <Talk?> 09:54, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

[edit]

While ive got you talking in regards to this image I wonder if you could answer some questions so I could better understand all this.

So I understand that the Fire Lord image would be classed as a derivative work as an action figure. But what about a simple Lego minifigure with a street cleaner. Is this simple enough not to meet the threshold of originality and therefore free to use? Salavat (talk) 09:29, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CC 3.0 unported?

[edit]

I am having a trouble with the lic.s

Wikipedia says, "must allow commercial reuse"

I know CC Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 unported is acceptable?

CC Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 generic is not?

Is ONLY 3.0 unported with "share alike" ok?

Is ONLY "share alike" okay? (and therefore CC Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 unported, too)

Fleetham (talk) 16:11, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now I think, for CC-lic.: must have ShareAlike, must not have NonCommercial Fleetham (talk) 17:27, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanette

[edit]

Ummm the already this admitted photo, I do not deal for that you want to erase it if it has everything allowed in wikipedia;Juanok1990 talk 17:20, 08 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wikinetbot‎ i jego pacynki

[edit]

Ale tutaj musisz prosic jakiegos admina-CU o interwencje, zeby to rozwiazac raz, a porzadnie. Masur (talk) 10:12, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

...and its counterpart without flash. Cheers! Ubcule (talk) 16:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Shrek_baloon.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Tryphon 22:08, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Shrek_&_donkey_like_children.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Tryphon 22:11, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:End_of_Civilization.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Tryphon 22:12, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Donkey_&_Fairy.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Tryphon 22:13, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ice_Shrek_&_Fiona.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Tryphon 22:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj. Piszę ws. tej edycji. Zwracam Tobie uwagę została poczyniona wbrew polityce Commons:File renaming. Otrzymałeś specjalne uprawnienie, więc korzystaj zgodnie z przyjątą polityką. Dziękuję JDavid (talk) 17:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pkt 5. jasno mówi o błędach w nazewnictwie np. Brendt Powrut zwycienscóf.jpg Tutaj natomiast jedynie przemieniłeś ponieważ nie było polskich liter. To nie podlega pod tę regułę, ponieważ nazwa jest poprawna, a należało przelinkować 7 różnych projektów. To że nie ma polskich liter nie stanowi o zmianie. Sam staram się nie podawać polskich liter co ułatwia linkowanie plików w obcojęzycznych projektach. Przypominam pkt 5. "correct obvious errors in file names" czyli nazwy z oczywistymi błędami, które mogą propagować błędy. Dodanie tylko polskich liter powoduje dużą ilość pracy którą trzeba wykonać, a nic nie poprawia. Spójrz także na COM:MOVE#What_files_should_not_be_renamed.3F. Dziękuję JDavid (talk) 09:33, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Переименования

[edit]

Здравствуйте. Прошу вас откатить ваше самовольное переименование файла http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:10_Russian_rubles_(2011).png . Не ститая того, что к этому действию у вас не было оснований, новое имя файла нелепо, и для таких как вы написано в категории http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Commemorative_coins_of_the_Russian_Federation - использование английского, равно как и сам этот выпад, по меньшей мере, - дурной тон. Я согласен, что имена для постороннего человека не кажутся "хорошими" - но увидя http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Каталог_памятных_монет_России/2011 - в котором вы сделали красную ссылку, что за 20 лет монет выпущенно тысяча, что это единственный способ создать его.

Не доводите до спора, пожалуйста, не делайте так больше. С лучшими пожеланиями, Serjio-pt (talk) 17:16, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, я видел ту заявку. Просто она подана с неведомым намерением и неясно, где нужно было то имя. Всего доброго. Serjio-pt (talk) 13:00, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
In my opinion this image has not interest at all. Zero ! Thats why I nominated it for deletion. But of course, I accept the consensus. But why adding Category:women in France ? The girl should live in US, Swaziland or China. It doesnt matter for the photo and its subject about washing.
I simply try to refine categories such as men in France, women of France, Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean sea, because these categories are (were) crowded.--Civa (talk) 16:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

[edit]

Hi Electron. May you remove the smiley from your signature per Commons:Signatures? Thanks! --ZooFari 15:35, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About ElenaJimenez.jpg

[edit]

Hello, Electron. My english is not as well as I wish so I´ll try to explain me. What about my contribution (ElenaJimenez.jpg)? See U. --Sorayaes (talk) 16:17, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Renamed file objection

[edit]

Hi Electron. This is to remind you that you should follow the renaming guidelines when moving files. The following move does not appear to be in accordance with the guidelines: [1] Reason: Commons:File renaming#What files should not be renamed?. If you disagree with the this note, disregard it and let me know your reason. Thanks, --ZooFari 05:18, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate uploads

[edit]

Hi, I am just reversing the {{Duplicate}} tags on illustrations from Jules Vernes books, eg File:Chateaucarpathes1.jpg. Looking carefully at the images that you uploaded from http://jv.gilead.org.il/rpaul/ I see the files are slightly larger than our ones, but they were created a month after our ones (Nov 2007) and they have a JPEG comment of "http://www.RenePaul.net " and "Copyright Notice http://www.RenePaul.net". I can detect no visual difference between the files. It looks to me as though the size difference is simply because he edited them to add his notices. I expect he got them from Commons or the same source as our uploader. So our policy is to keep the original upload and not replace them with copies that have boomeranged back :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 05:54, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After the two duplicates were deleted, I created a link from File:'The_Carpathian_Castle'_by_Léon_Benett_33.jpg to File:Chateaucarpathes1.jpg as File:Chateaucarpathes1.jpg was in use in many places and didn't want to give the overloaded delinker more work. In the case of File:Chateaucarpathes4.jpg I did move it to File:'The Carpathian Castle' by Léon Benett 37.jpg to complete the set. But I have no real problem with moving the other one too so long as we keep the redirects. I will drop a note to the admin who did the original duplicate deletion, just in case he is now confused :-).
At some stage I will delete the copy fraud JPEG comment fields from the remaining images if I can not find and more of the original set. --Tony Wills (talk) 22:23, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ad: Dziecko

[edit]

Zainteresuje. Dzięki. Ankry (talk) 19:31, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wnętrzności (szybsze ładowanie zdjęć)

[edit]

Dzięki za radę, popróbuję. Zobaczymy czy to coś przyspieszy i czy potrafię tego dokonać? Pozdrawiam. Ewkaa (talk) 18:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Raczej nie skorzystam już z hurtowego ładowania zdjęć. Nie za bardzo mam czas żeby oswoić tego Commonista. Podchodzę zrywami w zależności od wolnego czasu. Poza tym bardziej rozumiem rosyjski, niemiecki, czeski itd., niż angielski ;). pozdr. Ewkaa (talk) 21:59, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

W sprawie grafiki

[edit]

Nic nie jest mi wiadome, czy grafika była publikowana przed 1994 r. Sądziłem, że zrobiłem wszystko ok. Jednak okazuje się, że nie. Zresztą to już nie ma znaczenia. Została usunięta z zasobów commons. Pozdrawiam Kargul1965 (talk) 10:31, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

W związku z tym, że autor był narodowości niemieckiej - podlegał prawu niemieckiemu. Zgodnie z prawem niemieckim z 10 stycznia 1876 r. - okres prawa autorskiego obejmował jedynie 5 lat, według prawa z 9 stycznia 1907 r. - 10 lat i 25 okres ochrony po śmierci autora, według prawa z 12 maja 1940 r. wydłużony został do 25 lat. Prawo autorskie z 9 września 1965 r. rozróżnia twórczość intelektualną (utwór) § 68 i 72 - ujmuje dalej okres 25 lat. Nowelizacja z 24 czerwca 1985 r. określała prawo autorskie na fotografie do 50 lat, natomiast nowelizacja prawa w 1995 r. (dostosowanie do norm unijnych) powoduje, że zachowany został okres ochrony na 50 lat od czasu powstania (gdy zdjęcie nie zostało opublikowane w tym okresie) lub 50 lat po śmierci autora w przypadku publikacji. Dane tyczą niemieckiego prawa autorskiego. Wszystkie dane znajdziesz na Wikipedia de. Wystarczy trochę poklikać.
Nie ma źródeł, które by poświadczały, że grafika została opublikowana, więc przestała mieć okres ochronny w 1978 r., bo została zrobiona w 1928 r. (według informacji na odwrocie oryginału) i dalej - nie podlega żadnej ochronie praw autorskich. Ustawy te jeszcze dodatkowo określają jakie fotografie były poddane ochronie. Ale to już inna sprawa. Dziękuję przy okazji za odpowiedź. Pozdrawiam Kargul1965 (talk) 13:36, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Dzięki za namiary. Podałem te ustawy gwoli informacji, na podstawie, których kierowałem się przy dodawaniu grafiki do zasobów commons. Pozdrawiam Kargul1965 (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:Darth Vader costume.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--ANDROBETA 20:07, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Franz San Galli pictures

[edit]

Dear Mr. Electron,

April 2009 we have been in contact about the pictures if my uncle Franz San Galli and their use by everybody. You told they are in public domain because of their age. OK, everybody may use them under the following conditions, because they are not in public domain: I have been really working on them (2004?) like on hundreds of pictures of my family, these photos going back to approximately 1868. You can find my tips for this kind of work on http://www.gruner-fam.de/BilderArchiv.html .

So what I claim is putting my name as origin and overworker af these pictures. I have been working years to find them, and also to learn how to make them look much better. I have been supporting the author of a Russian book about my oncle, and there I eaven did not have to ask for being mentioned in it.

Bye. Yours

Andreas Gruner, Bonn

Dear Mr. Andreas Gruner,
Thank you for your kindly permission. I appreciate your hard work and time you contributed to collect the photos of your known family. But to say the truth a retouch or digital improvement of the file is not the thing that gives the authorship (as e.g. a retouch or a conservation of a painting doesn't give the author's rights).
I have add the date about your family photos archive and put your name as an overworker on each of the files. If there are some mistakes or inaccuracy you can fix it yourselfe, as well (because everybody can edit here, on Wikimedia Commons).
Regards Electron   08:21, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Alaiza_Pashkievich.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mitrius (talk) 09:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pee.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kgorman-ucb (talk) 01:33, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:White Dove With Olive Branch.tif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 13:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:White Dove With Olive Branch.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 13:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

wersja pliku

[edit]

Pamięć podręczną przeglądarki odświeżałem, sprawdzałem w innych przeglądarkach – efekt "starego pliku" pojawiał się niezmienne przez godzinę. To chyba jednak serwery Commons mają taki sposób buforowania grafik, który nie uwzględnia daty pliku. Tu chyba pies pogrzebany. Na stronach, którymi się opiekuję nigdy nie ma takich problemów. Inne serwery – brak problemu. / Andrzej 22 (talk) 17:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brave_Men.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Missvain (talk) 23:44, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Holding_on_to_the_essence.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Missvain (talk) 23:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hawaiian_Paniolo_Monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Warfieldian (talk) 05:02, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friendship_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

66.191.227.5 13:17, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Ghosts Project, Jill Tracy.jpg

[edit]

File:The Ghosts Project, Jill Tracy.jpg is from 2008, not 1908. I believe it's OK, though, as I've explained in rewriting the permissions section of that page. But do be careful about this sort of thing! - Jmabel ! talk 01:27, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friendship_Never_Ends.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ices2Csharp (talk) 14:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]