User talk:Eduemoni
Critically evaluate Flickr licenses | Image:LeToya o.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters.
|
Also Image:LeToya new.jpg, the Flickr uploader is definitively not the author of this images and he can not license the images under a free cc license. --Martin H. (talk) 00:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I just noticed, that you uploaded the images to Flickr yourself to make them look free. This practice is called Flickrwashing and it is inadmissible for a positive and trustful collaboration here at Commons, you should stop this immediately. --Martin H. (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Hi again, your statement on my talkpage is a bit confusing: you say, that you toke the images with you own camera. No, thats wrong for at last one image according to the metadata. If you have a permission from the author it is not our intention to destroy your work or prevent you from uploading free images, we just try to keep Commons free from images that are not free (just take a look at Special:NewFiles, there are a very few non-free images). Thanks for deleting the images on Flickr again and welcom back to Commons ;) --Martin H. (talk) 01:12, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Long time ago, but I repeat my warning and deletion: Do not flickr wash images to commons with uploading them to your flickr account. Uploading images to your flickr does not make them yours or give you the right to license them. --Martin H. (talk) 01:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Copyright violations
[edit]
Hello Eduemoni.
You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful. This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions. |
Martin H. (talk) 02:00, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Please remain calm and collegial
[edit]
--Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- The latest edits I have seen by Eduemoni looks rater civil. I wonder if this notice landed on the right page? Of course I can only agree with the advise so I hope Eduemoni will remember it. --MGA73 (talk) 10:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, what do you mean by "on the right page"? Writing "Martin H. ... went into madness"[1] is rather a personal attack. --Túrelio (talk) 10:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry I did not comment before now. I think it is a pretty fair note Eduemoni made. Have you looked at Martin H's page where user tried to get into a dialog with Martin? I thought it was a comment on that and found it a bit hard to leave a message to only one part. --MGA73 (talk) 09:06, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm, what do you mean by "on the right page"? Writing "Martin H. ... went into madness"[1] is rather a personal attack. --Túrelio (talk) 10:44, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
POTY
[edit]Hi Eduemoni,
Como és brasileiro, vou escrever em português.
Por favor, inclua um link na tua página de usuário da en.wiki para a tua conta no Commons, ou o teu voto na competição Imagem do Ano 2010 não poderá ser contado.
Atenciosamente, Béria Lima msg 09:02, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:Lol2.gif
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Lol2.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
russavia (talk) 15:53, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Lol2.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
russavia (talk) 01:47, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
File:Dogecoin alternative.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Stefan4 (talk) 16:05, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Dogecoin logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Stefan4 (talk) 16:06, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 16:58, 24 August 2014 (UTC)