User talk:Drtrotsky
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:19, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Flyorov monument in Dubna.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Uncle Fred 12:28, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
This picture does not contradict the Civil Code of the Russian Federation on the freedom of panorama.
According to Article 276 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation: 1. Accepted without the consent of the author or other right holder and without payment of remuneration, reproduction and distribution of manufactured copies, communication by cable or cable, bringing to the public knowledge of works of fine art or photographic work that are constantly in a place open to free access, with the exception of If the image of the work is the main object of use or the image of the work is used for profit. 2. Free use is allowed by reproducing and distributing manufactured copies, broadcasting or cable, bringing to the public information in the form of images of works of architecture, town planning and works of landscape art located in a place open to free access or prominent from it places. This monument is situated in a place open to free access (at a cross of streets in Dubna). And It's not the object of use or the image of the work is used for profit. Drtrotsky (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- С 1 октября 2014 года законодательство изменилось — была установлена свобода панорамы для произведений архитектуры, градостроительства и садово-паркового искусства[1]. Для произведений изобразительного искусства (например, скульптур) по-прежнему действуют ограничения.
- Согласно статье 1276 Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации:
- 1. Допускаются без согласия автора или иного правообладателя и без выплаты вознаграждения воспроизведение и распространение изготовленных экземпляров, сообщение в эфир или по кабелю, доведение до всеобщего сведения произведения изобразительного искусства или фотографического произведения, которые постоянно находятся в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, за исключением случаев, если изображение произведения является основным объектом использования или изображение произведения используется в целях извлечения прибыли.
- 2. Допускается свободное использование путём воспроизведения и распространения изготовленных экземпляров, сообщения в эфир или по кабелю, доведения до всеобщего сведения в форме изображений произведений архитектуры, градостроительства и произведений садово-паркового искусства, расположенных в месте, открытом для свободного посещения, или видных из этого места.
- Статья 1276 Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации Drtrotsky (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Уважаемый участник, пожалуйста, воздержитесь от переноса со страницы на страницу реплик Вашего оппонента, – такие действия трактуются как «подделка подписи», считаются разновидностью вандализма и могут привести к блокировке Вашей учётной записи. Столь подробные выдержки из ГК РФ также не нужны — содержание этих статей хорошо известно админкорпусу этого проекта, и правило COM:FOP#Russia основано на их содержании. В данном случае Вы неправы — фото скульптурных работ, не перешедших в общественное достояние, не могут быть здесь размещены, но при этом имеется возможность их загрузки непосредственно в русскую Википедию на условиях добросовестного использования. Sealle (talk) 04:02, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
File:E. M. Tareev portrait.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Uncle Fred 18:27, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Please see the abovementioned justification Drtrotsky (talk) 19:10, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Могила академика Евгения Тареева.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Uncle Fred 18:32, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- The same. Please see the abovementioned justification Drtrotsky (talk) 19:11, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Tarnopol district in 1812.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |