-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 03:06, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−
Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content,
TEXT TO SPEECH FOR BLIND COMPUTER USERS, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and
policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review
our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects:
Wikipedia,
Wikibooks,
Wikisource,
Wikinews,
Wiktionary and
Wikiquote.
If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an
alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at
Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.
--Motopark (talk) 11:19, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
File:TEXT TO SPEECH PROCESSING.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Motopark (talk) 11:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
File:COGNITRON.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Motopark (talk) 11:22, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
File:Cognitron.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
Motopark (talk) 11:22, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−
Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content,
User:Drmarcobitetto, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and
policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review
our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects:
Wikipedia,
Wikibooks,
Wikisource,
Wikinews,
Wiktionary and
Wikiquote.
If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an
alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at
Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.
--Motopark (talk) 11:25, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−
Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content,
Dr. Marco Bitetto, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and
policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review
our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects:
Wikipedia,
Wikibooks,
Wikisource,
Wikinews,
Wiktionary and
Wikiquote.
If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an
alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at
Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.
--Motopark (talk) 04:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
File:Dr. Bitetto and Squier.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:17, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
File:Dr. Bitetto and Friends.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
|
. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 02:18, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 10:27, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:45, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
| You have been blocked from editing Commons for for one week. The reason for the block is for repeatedly uploading material after it has been deleted by Commons process and for vandalism. ( block log). If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. |
To date you have made no useful edits on Commons. Please take this week to decide whether you would like to be a useful contributor to Commons or just a nuisance. The next infraction of our rules will bring a longer suspension, possibly indefinite.. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:44, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]