User talk:Dr.BenitaMartin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dr.BenitaMartin!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:39, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ein Zeitzeuge berichtet--Morgenpost, 11- April 2010 2013-05-19 07-32.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Rahul Bott (talk) 05:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malzmühle 2011, Graphit, Kohle, Acryl, ADA Dimensionsmalerei®, Dr. Benita Martin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 14:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Max Müller (Chemnitz).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Max Müller (Chemnitz).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 23:10, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hiermit bestätige ich, dass ich das Werk selbst gemalt, fotografiert und veröffentlicht habe. Damit bin ich Urheberin des Gemäldes und des Fotos für wikipedia.

Lizenzfreigabe

w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.


Vielen Dank --Dr.BenitaMartin 11:12, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Benita Martin, danke für Ihre Bilder, JuTa kannst du o.g. prüfen und ggf. das Bild wiederherstellen? Danke. Gruß --Jean11 (talk) 17:27, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, das Bild wurde nicht gelöscht, sondern umbenannt nach: File:Gottfried Müller (Chemnitz).jpg. Gruß --JuTa 17:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Danke füt die Info. Gruß --Jean11 (talk) 19:28, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Barberina, Postkarte um 1920.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

тнояsтеn 14:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ingrid Mössinger -Porträt gemalt von Dr- Benita Martin-ADA Dimensionsmalerei ® 2013-10-26 18-27.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lupo 18:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Karl-Heinz Richter Porträt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lupo 18:52, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Bernard Katz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lupo 18:58, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Professor Wolf D.Hartmann.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lupo 19:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Professor Paul Rother.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lupo 19:10, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Addi Jacobi.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lupo 19:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gottfried Müller (Chemnitz).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lupo 19:29, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Professor Cornelius Weiss.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lupo 19:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Malzm%C3%BChle_2011,_Graphit,_Kohle,_Acryl,_ADA_Dimensionsmalerei%C2%AE,_Dr._Benita_Martin.jpg


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Professor_Wolf_D.Hartmann.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Karl-Heinz_Richter_Portr%C3%A4t.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sir_Bernard_Katz.jpg


https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Professor_Paul_Rother.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Addi_Jacobi.JPG

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ingrid_M%C3%B6ssinger_-Portr%C3%A4t_gemalt_von_Dr-_Benita_Martin-ADA_Dimensionsmalerei_%C2%AE_2013-10-26_18-27.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gottfried_M%C3%BCller_(Chemnitz).jpg

[:File:Professor Cornelius Weiss.JPG]

Hiermit bestätige ich, dass ich Malerin und Fotografin dieser Dateien bin. Ich bin die Urheberin und übergebe der Wikipedia die Rechte an den Bildern zur Veröffentlichung.

Danke für die Bemühungen

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Barberina,_Postkarte_um_1920.jpg

Hiermit betsätige ich, dass ich Fotografin dieser Postkarte bin und übergebe der wikipedia die Nutzungsrechte.

Danke für die Bearbeitung Benita Martin

Um die Postkarte geht's doch gar nicht. Allerdings glaube ich kaum, dass jemand, der im Jahr 2015 hier editiert, im Jahr 1920 das Foto gemacht hat, das auf der Postkarte zu sehen ist. Die Tatsache, dass dieser Benutzer die Postkarte abfotografiert hat, ist komplett unerheblich. Bei den anderen Dateien geht es auch nicht darum, ob der Benutzer diese Zeichnungen selbst abfotografiert hat, sondern--da diese Zeichnungen sich sehr genau an die fotografischen Vorlagen halten und somit "derivative works" sind--ob eine Freigabe der Fotografen der zu Grunde liegenden Fotografien vorliegt. Lupo 10:56, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Ireen Sheer, Porträt gemalt von Dr- Benita Martin,-ADA Dimensionsmalerei ® 2013-10-26 18-25.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lupo 19:45, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hiermit bestätige ich, dass ich Malerin und Fotografin dieser datei bin. Ich bin die Urheberin und übergebe die Nutzungsechte der datei an die wikipedia weltweit Danke für die Bearbeitung Benita Martin


Betreff Urheberrecht

Zur rechtlichen Lage

http://zeichnen-lernen.net/kunstkurse/kunstrecht-urheberrecht.php

"Darf ich Bilder aus dem Internet als Vorlage .... verwenden? Wie weiter oben geschrieben, darfst du dies tun. Allerdings darfst du deine Vorlage nicht veröffentlichen. Wenn du dein abgezeichnetes Bild veröffentlichen willst, stell sicher, dass es sich deutlich vom Original unterscheidet und ein eigenständiges Werk bildet.."

Alle Bilder unterscheiden sich deutlich von den Fotos, da sie in völlig andere Farbe in Aquarelltechnik gemalt, bzw. Zeichnungen sind. Sie stellen somit eigene Kunstwerke dar.

Außerdem sind mir sämtliche noch lebende Personen persönlich bekannt, zusätzlich einige aus früheren Zeiten aus dem TV.

Danke für die Bearbeitung

Benita Martin

Ob dieser Benutzer die dargestellten Personen kennt oder im Fernsehen gesehen hat ist komplett unerheblich. Ich glaube kaum, dass der Fernsehsender die notwendige Freigabe erteilt hat. Im Übrigen würde ich dem Benutzer empfehlen, sich professionellen Rat zum Thema "eigenständiges Werk" zu holen. Lupo 10:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]