User talk:DimiTalen
Archive: User:DimiTalen/Archive 1 · User:DimiTalen/Archive 2
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Matate valley seen from Tizi n'Aguersioual, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View of Tamguist from across the valley, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tabayat beach, towards the south, Timizguida Ouftas, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rocks, Touddmine beach, Tafedna, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cliffs to the north of Tafedna, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Taftast Ouaoulil beaches, Tafedna, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Amssakrou, Morocco, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sculpted calligraphy on the walls, Ben Youssef Madrasa, Marrakech, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View of Pont d'Iéna from Trocadéro, Paris, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Young child surrounded by pigeons, Eminönü Square, Istanbul, 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 | Category:Views of Cacapri from Monte Solaro is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:
If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). |
In addition, I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request, as linked above: not including reason, year, month, or day; not creating the subpage; and not transcluding. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests." — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 09:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Apologies, and thanks for the clear instructions. DimiTalen 18:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Footpath in Les Eucherts, with a view towards Les Arcs, La Rosière, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! TSK Bellecombe 1 base station, La Rosière, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View of Mont Blanc from below Chaz Dura, La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View of La Thuile from the Bosco Express chairlift, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hotel Alparena, Les Eucherts, La Rosière, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Photogenic mountain along the Ponteilles slope, La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ascending TSD Fourclaz Express, La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Looking up the Belvedere slope, La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View towards Monte Paramont from Col de la Fourclaz, La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Descending the San Bernardo slope towards the Fourclaz Express, La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! View of Village des Eucherts and the ski school in the evening, Les Eucherts, La Rosière, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Looking down the Liaison slope towards La Thuile, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pointe Rousse seen from Plan du Repos, Montvalezan, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
File tagging File:Line De Witte, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg
[edit]
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Line De Witte, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Line De Witte, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Syunsyunminmin (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
File tagging File:Amina Vandenheuvel, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg
[edit]
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Amina Vandenheuvel, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Amina Vandenheuvel, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Syunsyunminmin (talk) 13:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
|
|
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Amina Vandenheuvel on a white background, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Amina Vandenheuvel on a white background, Vlaams Parlement TV, 2024.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Syunsyunminmin (talk) 13:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Looking down Molenstraat from the IJzeren Brug intersection, Wetteren, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Inui Kotenshu roof details seen from the Dai-Tenshu, Matsumoto Castle, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Matsumoto Tourist Hotel, Fukashi 2-chome, Matsumoto, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Veldwegel, Wetteren, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kawaguchiko rowing center jetties on Lake Kawaguchi, with Mount Setto in the background, Fujikawaguchiko, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eurotunnel Shuttle terminal building, with the Cité Europe shopping center in the background, Coquelles, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! High Street at the Ashley Road and Waterloo Road intersection, Epsom, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Looking down Rue du Gros-Horloge, with balloons, Rouen, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
This doesnt seem to be connected to Liberalism, which is a political category. Rathfelder (talk) 10:24, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- How familiar are you with the political pillars in Belgian civil society? DimiTalen 10:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)
- This is an insurance company. You think it has political significance? Rathfelder (talk) 21:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's a fact. I recommend you read up on the history of the mutualities of Belgium. The social-democrat, christian-democrat, liberal, neutral and independent/libre mutualities are all born out of political movements and each of them retains institutional links to other representatives of their respective ideologies, like the political parties and unions. This is clearest for the largest forces in the landscape, the social-democrats and the christian-democrats, but also holds for the liberals. This memo from LM from 2011 explicitly states: "We zijn echter een liberale mutualiteit en daarom pleiten wij al tientallen jaren voor een structureel en bestendig overleg met Open Vld en MR." (We are however a liberal mutuality and therefore we have been pleading for decades for structural, permanent dialogue with Open Vld and MR [the two liberal parties]). --DimiTalen 05:53, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- This is an insurance company. You think it has political significance? Rathfelder (talk) 21:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit].jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Town hall, Houlgate, 2024 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Looking up Rue de la Chaussée from Rue Notre-Dame, Honfleur, 2024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:14, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit] |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Family picnic, Himeji Castle grounds, Himeji, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Looking up the Kyobashi River from Inario Bridge, Hiroshima, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Throngs of people walking towards Himeji Castle, Himeji, 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Luiz79
[edit]Hello, is everything ok? I believe there was an error when placing the following images for deletion because they were not COM:PERSONAL:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/137802499@N06/46731662211/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/137802499@N06/46731648631/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/137802499@N06/46678935302/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/137802499@N06/46551069202/ https://www.flickr.com/photos/137802499@N06/46541849192/ Luiz79 (talk) 12:17, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi colleague! Even though I didn't think those had the educational value we look for, we could argue that those could be kept too. Feel free to add them to the list of exceptions on the deletion nomination page. DimiTalen 12:25, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Paradiski ski passes.jpg
[edit]
|
|
| This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Paradiski ski passes.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 21:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Les 3 Vallées ski pass, 2022.jpg
[edit]
|
|
| This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Les 3 Vallées ski pass, 2022.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
