User talk:Didivo67

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Didivo67!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 06:58, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you know the sculptor of this statue and his/her death-year? --Túrelio (talk) 15:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same for:

--Túrelio (talk) 15:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soultz sous foret statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 16:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wall paintings in church

[edit]

Hi Didivo67, from its outer appearance the church in Helmlingen seems to be not so old. So, it can be assumed that the artwork is still in copyright. Regrettably, there is no free-of-panorama exception for indoor works in Germany. Therefore, a permission by the artist is needed for File:Helmlingen evangelische kirche1.jpg, File:Helmlingen evangelische kirche2.jpg and File:Helmlingen evangelische kirche3.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helmlingen evangelische kirche3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 09:12, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, You can remove the pictures.

File:Tieffenbach calvaire église St Barthélemy4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Suhayl091 (talk) 09:46, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Didivo6, do you know who created these murals? You are surely aware that unfortunately there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in France. So, we need to be sure, the murals are no longer copyrighted, which requires that the painter is dead since >70 years. --Túrelio (talk) 09:29, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Turelio
Ok you can delete them Didivo67 (talk) 09:39, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Westhouse

[edit]

Hello Didivo67, What is the point of putting categories (here) and then removing them again? Greeting Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 15:34, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Antoine
I know that my method to create a new category (with Hot Cat) generates duplicates that I have to delete afterwards! However it is simple and fast!
If you have a link to a help that avoids creating this duplicate and easy to use, I'm interested!
Have a nice day Didivo67 (talk) 15:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Didivo67, I don't have that, I do it the easy way without tools! Greeting Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 23:09, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Wittersheim portail rue neuve9.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wittersheim portail rue neuve9.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:05, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why add a category and then delete it again?

[edit]

Hi Didivo67, Why do you still add category and then remove it again like (here), (hier), (hier) and so on!? Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 12:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Antoine01, I think I found a way to do it without creating duplicates that I had to delete afterwards.
Have a nice day. Didivo67 (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Didivo67, Okay, because this is not the way to do that! Greeting Antoine.01overleg(Antoine) 14:25, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Un utilisateur du Bas-Rhin ?!

[edit]

Bonjour @Didivo67 !

Ton pseudonyme (je me permets de te tutoyer, n'hésite pas à t'y opposer si tu le souhaites) et tes contributions me font penser que tu viens du Bas-Rhin, ce qui est également mon cas. Ainsi, j'écris ce petit message pour faire connaissance. Nous avons un groupe de contributeurs basé sur Strasbourg (mais tout le monde ne vient pas de la ville !) qui s'appelle la Wikistub et dont je suis référent. Si ça t'intéresse, nous organisons des rencontres autour d'un verre, une fois par mois, sur Strasbourg. Sinon, je reste aussi disponible si tu souhaites simplement échanger :)

Peut-être à bientôt ! Le Commissaire (talk) 13:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

[edit]

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Ironing shops in France. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 00:39, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jmabel
Thanks for the advice Didivo67 (talk) 09:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And again for Category:Stèle Saint-Arbogast de Haguenau, which I have just found and will delete. - Jmabel ! talk 00:40, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And again for Category:Plaques in woerth. - Jmabel ! talk 05:47, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And again: Category:Stained-glass windows in Rittershoffen. Jmabel ! talk 17:43, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
File:Bischwiller pierre tombale église st nicolas hanhoffen5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ooligan (talk) 14:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Arrondissement Haguenau-Wissembourg in museums has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Jmabel ! talk 11:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]