User talk:Davekern

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Davekern!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Swedish Passport 2012.png

File:Swedish Passport 2012.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 22:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minato City, Tokyo, Japan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:03, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:48, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poolbeg Lighthouse from Sea.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is slightly tilted, otherwise ok. --Plozessor 05:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC) Fixed the tile - good eye! --Davekern 11:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Just scroll so that the coastline is on the bottom of your screen ;) Thx, good now! --Plozessor 11:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swiss Embassy Dublin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you brighten the shadows a bit? The lower part with the gate etc. is too dark. --Plozessor 05:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC) Thanks! I've increased the brightness of the foreground gates a bit. --Davekern 11:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Government Buildings, Dublin, Ireland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This needs perspective correction and the big spot in the sky must be removed. Otherwise the left windows are very blue which looks slightly unnatural. In case you have increased blue saturation to make the sky look better, maybe make two versions and combine them. --Plozessor 05:45, 24 December 2023 (UTC) Fixed the blemish and perspective - the windows at the top are actually dark-reflective glass, and reflect light in a very strange way. Checking on Google Maps - you can see on an overcast day, the colour of the glass has a very dark-blue hue. --Davekern 11:27, 24 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Ok, good now! --Plozessor 11:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Department of the Taoiseach, Dublin.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Perspective could be corrected --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

It's been fixed Davekern (talk) 13:27, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

•  Support perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:46, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011 Volkswagen Polo S 60 1.2 Front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Views of Minato, Tokyo from Shibuya Stream.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category or gallery that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
•  Comment The beginning of the scope could be: Views of Minato, Tokyo. But we must also add the sense of orientation of sight. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

  I've replaced the scope to Views of Minato, Tokyo.

  This was taken in Shibuya Stream - is there a specific category that would be better suited?

  There's Views from Shibuya Stream, but doesn't seem as well suited as Minato specific. Davekern (talk) 15:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

•  Support OK now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manhatten Bridge - taken from Washington Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 00:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 14 December 2024 (UTC)