User talk:D9
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Deprecated License
[edit]
Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Vignola Regla de las 5 ordenes de la arquitectura (1593).pdf, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.
For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 13:20, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Los diez Libros de Architectura - Vitrubio.pdf was uncategorized on 26 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
File:Los diez Libros de Architectura - Vitrubio.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ices2Csharp (talk) 07:12, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Escudo UMNG
[edit]Hola D9!
Entiendo, pero el escudo esta basado en la descripción oficial [1] y usa los tonos que el Taller de Heráldica estableció. Quien ideó el emblema tenia conocimientos heráldicos y creó un excelente escudo de armas. Lamentablemente en el país existe un total desconocimiento sobre la heráldica, nadie sabe entender e interpretar un verdadero escudo de armas, por ejemplo ese azul que usa la universidad, no es el azul heráldico, es tan oscuro que se puede confundir con el negro, el cual tiene otro significado. Le pongo otro ejemplo, la versión estética del escudo nacional que usan las instituciones gubernamentales no cumple totalmente con las leyes y decretos que establecen y regulan los símbolos patrios, o sea violan la ley.
Además el "Manual de Imagen Corporativa", define claramente que es el escudo (pag. 9) y que es el logosímbolo (pag. 11), este ultimo esta conformado por el escudo y el nombre de la universidad. Me pregunto, ¿la fuente "lydianBT bold" que indica el manual es de licencia libre?, pues algunas fuentes tienen derechos de autor. Igualmente, le recuerdo que Wikipedia no es un medio oficial de la universidad.
Cordial saludo. --SajoR (talk) 08:35, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Cúcuta Foto Aérea 2013.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Cúcuta Foto Aérea 2013.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cúcuta Foto Aérea 2013.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 13:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Cúcuta Foto Aérea 2013.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EEIM (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Easyfly Aircraft (CUC airport).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Gunnex (talk) 06:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Considering copyvio via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=68740975#post68740975 (2010, by "altx_90") = http://s629.photobucket.com/user/elplaneador/media/CUC/DSC04646.jpg.html (© by "elplaneador") = http://i629.photobucket.com/albums/uu20/elplaneador/CUC/DSC04646.jpg~original (identical exif). Gunnex (talk) 06:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
File:B727 Servientrega (CUC airport).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Gunnex (talk) 06:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Considering copyvio via http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=68740975#post68740975 (2010, by "altx_90") = http://s629.photobucket.com/user/elplaneador/media/CUC/DSC04655.jpg.html (© by "elplaneador") = http://i629.photobucket.com/albums/uu20/elplaneador/CUC/DSC04655.jpg~original (identical exif). Gunnex (talk) 06:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
File:AOC Breeze.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Gunnex (talk) 06:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Considering copyvio via http://www.ubergizmo.com/2011/01/breeze-tablet-updates-from-ces/ (06.01.2011, by "By Eliane Fiolet ") = http://cdn2.ubergizmo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/AOC-breeze-tablet_01.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 06:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Carmen de Tonchalá - Lugar de fundación de Cúcuta.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Carmen de Tonchalá - Lugar de fundación de Cúcuta.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 06:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Torre del Reloj Cúcuta.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Torre del Reloj Cúcuta.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Torre del Reloj Cúcuta.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 06:37, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Rivers Towers - Abril, 2011 - Cúcuta, Colombia.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Rivers Towers - Abril, 2011 - Cúcuta, Colombia.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Rivers Towers - Abril, 2011 - Cúcuta, Colombia.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gunnex (talk) 06:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
File:Cúcuta Foto Aérea 2013.JPG
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)