User talk:Coyote sprit~commonswiki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[edit]

In traditional European-based heraldry, where it's the textual Blazon which is authoritative, many different artistic renderings of the same blazon could be acceptable, and if you make a new rendering from scratch based on the blazon, then you own the copyright to your particular rendering. By the same token, of course, others own the copyrights to their renderings... AnonMoos (talk) 13:16, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Also, "crest" is not synonymous with "coat of arms"... AnonMoos (talk) 17:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bad habit, I'll try to remember to put COA instead. --Coyote sprit (talk) 18:32, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]


File:Rijeka COA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 09:40, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

[edit]

20:21, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

[edit]

02:28, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

coats of arms

[edit]

Hello, I am interested in hiring an artist who knows heraldry. If you are interested, please contact me at coadb@mail.com.

File:Flag of the Israeli Army (Land Arm).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 20:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]