User talk:Cfaerber/Archive 1
|
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to this page. |
Bundesstraßen
Hallo, wir sollten uns wegen der Bundesstraßen nochmal kurzschließen. Ich habe mein Commonplace erstmal angehalten. Lädst Du alle hoch oder sollen wir uns die Arbeit irgendwie aufteilen? Benennung mit "de" oder ohne?--Qualle 12:39, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
- Ich mach jetzt ohne "de" weiter --Qualle 12:54, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
- Ich lade dann alle hoch, mit en:ls und en:vim geht das recht schnell, die Textdatei für das Skript zu erstellen. (Außerdem muss ich eh noch die Farben korrigieren.) -- 3247 16:31, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
Bundesstraße Images
If you operate bot please add redundant messages in PNG images when they have SVG counterparts. For example in Image:Bundesstraße 289n number.png {{redundant|[[:Image:Bundesstraße 289n number.svg]]}}. --EugeneZelenko 04:14, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
- By the way, because of bugs in MediaWiki, it's important for SVGs to have a "natural size" of at least 300px, and preferably at least 1500px, because MediaWiki refuses to "scale up" these images in most circumstances. I've failed to convince anyone this is actually a bug. If you agree with me, please comment at bugzilla:3499! Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 02:05, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Kannst du bitte noch Image:Bundesstraße 31a number.svg erstellen? Danke, MarianSigler {bla} 11:02, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
SVG optimization
Thanks for fixing up Image:Commons-logo.svg. I'm trying to learn about SVG, and I'm curious: what program did you use? Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 01:49, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
- Well, first I used Inkscape to convert the lines; then I used vim to clean the SVG file up. -- 3247 18:54, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Could you please take a look into these images? May be you could create SVG versions (or improved versions) of them if you'll have some free time? Thank you. --EugeneZelenko 03:32, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Done. -- 3247 13:48, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Great! Thank you! --EugeneZelenko 14:32, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- I love the SVG versions! Could you re-upload Image:Braille Hypen.svg as Image:Braille Hyphen.svg? (I can't fix it myself here at work.) Also, you forgot Image:Braille QuoteOpen.svg in User:3247/braille.pl. dbenbenn | talk 17:17, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks. The errors have been fixed, too. -- 3247 22:26, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
Could you upload another set of a 6 dot brille letters? It could be helpful for non-latin based brille letters, eg., en:Korean Braille and en:Japanese Braille. Although I can use Image:Braille C3.svg for final "ㅂ"(b) in korean or "い"(i) in japanese, it is not convenient. It coule be easier if "Image:Braille6 Dots-14.svg" is avalable. The 8-dot version(Image:Braille8 Dots-14.svg) could be another option. But it could mislead that these braille are defined in the 8-dot system. Also, you could upload a SVG version of en:Image:Brajlo.gif. -- ChongDae 07:18, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Yo, man, I just wanted to give you a shout + gratitude for creating this script. Even though I ended up not needing to modify + use it like I thought (the dot configurations was already there representing different letters), it was fuckin’ great having the script available, as well as the resulting SVGs uploaded. Much thanks again. —Wiki Wikardo 20:34, Fourth of July 2006 (UTC)
Could you please take a look to this image? May be you could create SVG versions of complete set (0 - 9) if you'll have some free time? Thank you. --EugeneZelenko 02:37, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
- Great! Thank you! --EugeneZelenko 04:07, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Hi! Could you please create and upload thos images? The alternativs Image:200px-Bundesautobahn 683 number.svg.png and Image:200px-Bundesautobahn 680 number.svg.png]] aren't that good. Schaengel89 15:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Done. -- 3247 12:21, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- There are four other missing signs: Image:Bundesautobahn 999 number.svg, Image:Bundesautobahn 533 number.svg, mage:Bundesautobahn 201 number.svg and Image:Bundesautobahn 89 number.svg. Could you please...? Schaengel89 19:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- If you don't suggest to delete them because "this road doesn't exist see http://www.autobahn-online.de/auswahl.html" ... again. -- 3247 11:04, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
- There are four other missing signs: Image:Bundesautobahn 999 number.svg, Image:Bundesautobahn 533 number.svg, mage:Bundesautobahn 201 number.svg and Image:Bundesautobahn 89 number.svg. Could you please...? Schaengel89 19:03, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Thx
Das war ein guter Tipp von dir wegen des Louvre-Bildes. Wenn du magst, schau doch mal Bildrechte durch, vielleicht fällt dir noch der eine oder andere Bearbeitungsbedarf auf. Guten Rutsch! -- Simplicius 20:57, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
Could you please add redundant messages in PNG images when they have SVG counterparts? For example in Image:FIAV 000001.png {{redundant|[[:Image:FIAV 000001.svg]]}}. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko 05:38, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Road signs of Germany, ich denke mal das hast du nicht mehr in deiner watchlist. --MarianSigler {bla} 15:58, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
The rights of governments to declare their works PD
- I believe you are correct. Some folks read the EU harmonization directive claiming otherwise, but to believe them, I would have to believe their assertion that the legislators of the Italy did not understand the directive, and by extension that Parliament of the UK did not understand it either. It strains credulity.
- The folks who claim the EU harmonization directive makes it illegal for governments to expire copyrights prior to 70 years pma have proposed that the PD-ItalyGov template be deleted.
- You may have an opinion on one side or the other on this subject, the delete/keep comments are here: Template:Deletion_requests#.7B.7BPD-ItalyGov.7D.7D -Mak 18:41, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
Münchner Löwe
Was ist mit dem Bild Image:Munich Lion Rudolph Moshammer.jpg? "Unclear license"? Sicher nicht, das ist von mir und ich kann mir die Lizenz aussuchen, die ich will. "no panoramafreiheit"? Warum nicht, das ist öffentliche Kunst, die auf unbestimmte Zeit im Stadtbild ausgestellt wird. Genauso wie die Buddy Bären. Und bevor du da jetzt auch LAs rein packst, lies dir noch die Diskussion auf WP:BR durch: de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:Bildrechte#Panoramafreiheit_-_Stichwort_.22bleibend.22. Der LA fehlt auch auf der LA-Seite wo er diskutiert wird, was ich ja jetzt hier machen muss. MfG --BLueFiSH ✉ 22:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC) P.S. Den Dank für das B96b-Bild kannst du abschreiben.
UN-Map
I'm sorry, but this authorization was realized before that I create the template, even some weeks before of my user registration. This authorization comes of en.wikipedia (where I copy this template). Sorry fot the inconvenence. --Taichi 15:19, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Verkehrszeichen
Ich habe gesehen, dass du die Category:Road signs of Germany_(SVG) verschoben hast. Soetwas solltest du auf der alten Kat-Seite anmerken. Übrigens:
Aus Deinen Contributions geht hervor, dass Du einen Bot benutzt hast, was hier auch sinnvoll war. Ich kann dir aber nur dringend abraten, einen Bot ohne Bot-Flag mit einer Geschwindigkeit von 10 Edits / Minute laufen zu lassen. Damit müllst Du die Recent-Changes voll und bekommst deswegen Ärger. Also: Bitte nicht mehr als 3 Edits / Minute, einen eigenen Bot-Account anlegen und ein Bot-flag beantragen. Augiasstallputzer 12:32, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- War das nicht früher mal "Bots ohne Flag auf eigenes Risiko"? Aber, ok, das schein inzwischen anders zu sein. Sorry. -- 3247 19:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Du must auch bedenken, dass die Commons auf der ganzen Welt genutzt werden. Es gibt daher keine wesentliche uhrzeitabhängige Nutzungsschwankungen. Achte bitte auch darauf, dass du Links anpasst, wenn du ganze Kats verschiebst. M. f. G. Augiasstallputzer 19:32, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Your bot now has the bot flag set. Use wisely! Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass demandez 16:59, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Many thanks
for your initiative and help on Image:Bitmap VS SVG.svg. Thanks from France :] --Yug (talk) 18:42, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
93/98/EEC
You wrote: "93/98/EEC defines what a photographic work is, so the point where the line has to be drawn is now the same in all Member States." Sure? See User_talk:Lupo#User:Lupo.2FSimple_Photographs... if that can be firmly established, all the better, but so far I'm not convinced that "the line is the same in all Member States". But even if it isn't, we shouldn't use "simple photograph" tags. Lupo 11:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm sure. As it is defined in a directive, it's European law. So the European Court of Justice has the power to interpret the definition in a way that's binding for courts of all Member States. If the ECJ says that criterion X defines a photographic works, then criterion X has to be applied all over Europe.
- Member States can not, as the Berne Convention allows (it does not mandate a full protection for photographic works), give less protection to photographies that have criterion X. Such laws or judgments would have to be set aside by the ECJ.
- However, it's true that Member States might draw the line below the standard of the ECJ. In terms of Eurpopean law, they could protect some simple photographs differently from other simple photographs. It is unlikely that this will happen, though, as the Directive lowers the bar nearly to the lowest possible standard. -- ３２４７ (talk) 16:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- (Ihr sprecht beide deutsch, deshalb einfach so:) Ich erlaube mir zu widersprechen. Die Erwägungen am Anfang der Richtlinie geben nur Anhaltspunkte für die Auslegung und solange der EuGH kein Urteil gefällt hat, können die Mitgliedsstaaten und ihre Gerichte die Grenze unterschiedlich ziehen. DE und AT haben die Schwelle nach meinem Verständnis niedriger angesetzt als zB IT. Und wie gesagt ist das auch möglich, solange der EuGH keine eigene Rechtsprechung zum Thema hat. --h-stt !? 19:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Slovenian Highways
Is it possible for you to make 10 5 pictures of new slovenian highway numbers? I would like to use it on slovenian Wikipedia. Numbers have almost exactly the same shape as german Autobahn numbers (including with white frames), except they are green (Autobahn) and blue (Schnellstrasse) and have corresponding letter and number inside. Font is also more or less the same (at least for first 5 numbers). I need green version of A 1 through A 5 and blue version from H 1 to H 5. -- Keber1 19:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC) (corrected, I don't need blue numbers) -- Keber1 19:54, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
- Are they identical to the Greek motorwy numbers? -- ３２４７ (talk) 22:56, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Similar, but not identical. Frame is a little bit too "bold".
Frame is correct, color too, but Slovenian motorway signs have space between A and number.Also letters and numbers are little more narrow. Means same font AND same frame as German autobahn numbers,but with one space between A and number.(Again corrected, there's no space between A and number, I'll try to post a photo, but it's difficult to get one, because those numbers are new and few, present currently only on some motorway signs. -- Keber1 20:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
- Similar, but not identical. Frame is a little bit too "bold".
Blah, don't bother with it. I'll temporary use Greek numbers until I'll master Inkscape and get a good picture of one of Slovenian sign to make SVG with Inkscape. Thanks anyway. -- Keber1 20:33, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
SVG icons request
Could you please take a look to Commons:Village pump#Inscape guru needed? --EugeneZelenko 16:38, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:München Tram 20.png
|
Thanks for uploading Image:München Tram 20.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Loco085 07:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:München Tram 25.png
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:München Tram 25.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Loco085 07:06, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, the person who tagged your images was Ysangkok (see here). I only notifyed you, but i was seeing that your images are ok, I'll remove the tags, sorry for the inconvenience. Have a good day. Loco085 15:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
ISO 639
Thanks a lot for your fast and nice work on this svg image collection. ~ bayo or talk 16:55, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
braille.pl
Hello! I am a user from the English Wikipedia and wish to know how you use your braille.pl script to create the images. I am very interested in your reply. Kind regards, Extranet 06:00, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- You simply run it and it generates the files in the current directory. -- ３２４７ (talk) 13:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Image:ISO 639 Icon pt.svg
Hi,
I have some recent problems with an image your bot (3247's Image Wizard) has made in 2006.
The image is this one : 
Using firefox 3.0.4 it seems that a thumbnail of the svg shifts the text to right.
This does not happen with others pictures like the ones for «en» or «de».
There is also 
wich has the same problem.
You can see here different sizes of the picture : (20px), (30px), (40px), (50px), (60px), (70px), (80px).
Only 30px and 50px have problems.
But 30px is the commonly used size in the traduction project for each language on the fr wiki (see for example fr:Projet:Traduction/*/Demandes). Could it be possible to improve the picture so that no problem occurs ? Thanks for you attention, Fryderyk (d) 23:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- The same problem seems to occur on Opera 9.62.
- If you can read french, here is a discussion. Fryderyk (d) 05:25, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
- Strange. The images are converted to PNG by MediaWiki, so it must be a bug in MediaWiki's SVG rendering engine. (And of course, it will occur with every browser.)
- It seems that 30, 35, 45 and 50px are affected but that 29px/31px are ok:
(20 px), 
(21 px), 
(22 px), 
(23 px), 
(24 px), 
(25 px), 
(26 px), 
(27 px), 
(28 px), 
(29 px), 
(30 px), 
(31 px), 
(32 px), 
(33 px), 
(34 px), 
(35 px), 
(36 px), 
(37 px), 
(38 px), 
(39 px), 
(40 px), 
(41 px), 
(42 px), 
(43 px), 
(44 px), 
(45 px), 
(46 px), 
(47 px), 
(48 px), 
(49 px), 
(50 px), 
(51 px), 
(52 px), 
(53 px), 
(54 px), 
(55 px), 
(56 px), 
(57 px), 
(58 px), 
(59 px), 
(60 px) - Maybe you could just use 29 or 31px as a workaround until the bug is fixed. 3247 (T) 19:46, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Turned out to be an old bug that has already been fixed long ago. However, the cache had to be purged. -- 3247 (T)
Hi ! It seems that the problem occurs again for some unknown reason. I tried to purge the cache but this time it did not solve anything. Fryderyk (d) 13:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- It was reported on several occasions that there is something fishy going on with font replacements in the last few weeks. It seems that scaling can produce unexpected results when the image servers running the PNG conversion do not have the given font family. In addition, I am not at all sure librsvg can really handle multiple entries for fonts. So, you might consider replacing "Helvetica" as the first font with "Nimbus Sans L", which is installed here. At least for File:ISO 639 Icon pl.svg it seems to help. User:Sémhur suggests "DejaVu Sans Condensed", which from a technical standpoint makes no difference, it's also installed. I see it solely as a design issue. Nimbus is a Helvetica clone, so the difference to what was seen before is minimized. --Hk kng (talk) 22:20, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, I've uploaded it with Nimbus Sans L like Hk kng says. It works fine. This font is a good alternative to replace Helvetica. Sémhur (talk) 10:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Please help replace this outdated license
Hello!
Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.
The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.
Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.
The images we would like you to check are:
BotMultichillT 20:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
Bundesstraßen
Hallo, wenn ich mich richtig erinnere, hattest du die Bundesstraßennummern gemacht? Ich fürchte, es fehlen noch 508n und 26n. Falls du mal wieder Zeit und Lust hast, könntest du sie vielleicht noch erstellen? -- Timo Müller Diskussion 15:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
de:Bundesstraße 87n need a sign. --Eingangskontrolle (talk) 17:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Datei:Geistiges Eigentum und Wettbewerbsrecht.png
Hallo Cfaerber, ersteinmal vielen Dank für die vielen bereichernden Änderungen zum Artikel de:Geistiges Eigentum. Ich wollte nur kurz nachfragen, ob es für den Inhalt des folgenden, sehr hübschen Bildes gewisse Belege, die jene begriffliche Abgrenzungen stützen würden, gibt:
--Tddt (talk) 01:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Schuhgrößen
Hallo,
ich fürchte, die Grafik zu den Schuhgrößensystemen und der Text widersprechen sich: Europäische Größen sollten sich errechnen als Leistenlänge (= ca. Schuhinnenlänge = ca. Fußlänge + 1,5 cm), also z.B. Leistenlänge 24 cm für Fußlänge 22,5 cm (so auch in der Grafik) Schuhgröße 36 (in der Grafik aber eher 35). US-Größen sollten sich errechnen als (Leistenlänge - 8 Zoll) * 3, also z.B. Leistenlänge 11 Zoll (27,94 cm, in der Grafik aber 28,2 cm) ergibt Schuhgröße 9 (in der Grafik aber 8 1/2). Also entweder stimmt da was im Text nicht oder in der Grafik, oder ich rechne falsch. Wäre für Klärung dankbar. --UMyd (talk) 12:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
|
File:Bundesstraße 28a number.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.61.167.13 13:24, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
|
|
File:Shoesize-adult-en.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
WTM2 (talk) 14:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
|
|
File:Braille P.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
74.83.228.106 13:21, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Notification
Hello, there is a de-flag proposal at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag which affects your bot. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:46, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
Bot de-flagging notification
Hi Cfaerber/Archive 1, I'm writing to you because your bot 3247's Image Wizard (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a week from now (20 February 2014). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 22:18, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
ArchiveBot
Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:35, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
|
|
File:Bundesstraße 400 number.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2402:1980:81C1:DC49:0:0:0:1 01:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:DEgov-BMG-Logo en.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
77.87.228.68 13:54, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
How does one create an ISO 639-3 for bjs without breaking anything?
How does one create an ISO 639-3 for "bjs" (w:Bajan Creole), the right way without breaking anything? :-) CaribDigita (talk) 03:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)