User talk:Carol Fenijn
File:Pvddbadge.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Vera (talk) 12:46, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Vera, I made a picture of myself wearing a badge, I thought that would be my copyright, as it is my interpretation and representation of the badge. Why would my picture be a copyright violation and your picture of a simson kit not? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Simson_kit_(3).JPG Carol Fenijn (talk) 18:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
- The graphic on the badge is way more complicated than a generic drawing of a bicycle. That you took the picture is irrelevant since it's the drawing on the badge that is the subject of the picture, see com:dw Vera (talk) 16:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Vera, that is a bit simplistic, I am afraid. If my picture does breach any copyright law, which I doubt, yours certainly does as well. Do not forget that a badge is intended to be worn on e.g. clothes! Carol Fenijn (talk) 16:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- The graphic on the badge is way more complicated than a generic drawing of a bicycle. That you took the picture is irrelevant since it's the drawing on the badge that is the subject of the picture, see com:dw Vera (talk) 16:27, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
Your image depicts a distinct cartoon character. Copyright is given to complex creations. That this creation is worn on clothing is irrelevant, you're not allowed to reproduce and publish it without permission of its original author. The bicycle drawing is so generic that individual authors can come up with the same thing independent from each other.--Vera (talk) 08:27, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Vera, thanks for your reply. I think copyright laws do not only cover pictures but also text, and the combination of text + picture on your photo is copyrighted! Anyway, I may pursue this at some later point, for now I will let this rest. Cheers, Carol Fenijn (talk) 16:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.And also:
- File:Real-iqcomcf.jpg
- File:IQ certificate.png
- File:Sample IQ certificate of Metis.png
- File:Iqdiplomacf.png
- File:Sample IQ certificate in Dutch.png
- File:Iqsample.png
- File:Sample IQ certificate.jpg
Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification, Christian. At any rate for the metis certificate I did get permission by email, but I shall ask whether they will indicate that themselves on this site. Carol (talk) 07:39, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Smooth O (talk) 07:39, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
File:Santorini 4nl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bastique ☎ let's talk! 00:29, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Santorini 4en.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |