User talk:C T Johansson/2016

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Buddleja incana

[edit]

I have deleted the photo of the flower you have identified as Buddleja incana, as it does not resemble the species at all. Please see this link for a photo of the inflorescence, supplied by Eliane Meyer Norman, author of Buddlejaceae, Flora Neotropica: http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-HK5EMrwvgk4/TxKK0gHsm7I/AAAAAAAAAE4/eTM9RfO5-r8/s1600/Buddleja_incana.JPG Regards, harvey (talk) 21:33, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So renaming it is not an option any more? 83.233.110.101 05:02, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


really nice work on the Jardín Botánico de Quito

[edit]

just a bunch of fantastic pictures, great job


really nice pictures, great effort, nice camera, thanks for the excellent work for Quito

have a nice day



David Adam Kess (talk) 19th of March, around noon time 2016


one last thing, i made this link and tagged a few of your pictures if it is o.k.

and to better organize Flowers_of_Ecuador

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Flowers_of_Ecuador

un buen dia

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eriosyce villosa-IMG 1063.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. A nice composition. --Hubertl 18:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turbinicarpus beguinii-IMG 1068.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Peulle 15:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eriosyce napina ssp. riparia JA40-IMG 1066.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment It's very dark; is there any way you can lighten it slightly without ruining it? --Peulle 10:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)  Support I still think it's a bit dark, but I guess it's good enough for QI. --Peulle 11:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]