User talk:Bobulous

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bobulous!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:06, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2019!

Hi

Thank you so much for contributing to the UK section of this year's Wiki Loves Monuments contest, which finished yesterday. We really do appreciate the time and effort you've put in to record the UK's built cultural heritage for future generations.

Your contribution has been been added to our collections here on Wikimedia Commons, and is already available for editors to make use of on Wikipedia and elsewhere. It has also been entered into this year's contest. If you'd like to see your own images, just click on the uploads link at the top right of this page (if you don't see it, click on the Log in option first).

We've received over 10,000 UK entries this year, and it will take a few weeks for our volunteers and professional judges to decide on the final top 10. The winners will be announced by the end of this month, both here on Wikimedia Commons and also on the competition website.

The top 10 UK images will go forward to the international section where they will compete against winners from some 50 other countries. The international winners should be announced here in December.

Don't forget, by the way, that if you're hoping to win a prize in the contest it's essential that you have enabled email in your Wikimedia preferences. If you haven't, you're not eligible to win. If you're unsure, please check here.

Once again, many thanks for your help! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Lumley Chapel, view from the rear-left corner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:31, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Lumley Chapel, view of the rear-right wall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:50, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Photographic Light tables viewed from directly above.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of the Hall family in the churchyard of St Nicholas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brick Lane Jamme Masjid (parallel verticals version).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments O. K. now; good quality -- Spurzem 17:45, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Bobulous,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brick Lane Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:35, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)

 

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

---

Dear Bobulous,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 70 St Mary Axe seen from Bevis Marks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky is blown but might be fixable? --Ermell 17:52, 29 December 2019 (UTC) The same is seen in the RAW image capture. But the sky was bright and clear, so no information is actually lost: it was just a bright patch of sky. --Bobulous 17:55, 29 December 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:38, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 3 Broadgate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:55, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Broadgate Circle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 22:13, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finsbury Avenue Square, Broadgate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 22:16, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rush Hour by George Segal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 19:55, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 Exchange Square seen from the south-west corner of Exchange Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok --Poco a poco 14:08, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1 Broadgate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some minor chromatic aberrations near the right edge of the glass building, fixable. Otherwise nice and good quality --Jakubhal 22:23, 7 March 2020 (UTC) Difficult to fix this because a tilt+shift lens was used with a 12mm shift, so the aberrations are not symmetrical in the image. --Bobulous 17:25, 8 March 2020 (UTC) Ok, for me it is still acceptable, although it would be better improved. --Jakubhal 19:34, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chromorama by David Batchelor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 20:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 10 Exchange Square seen from Appold Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:20, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Broadwalk House seen from Appold Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 20:56, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 10 Exchange Square seen from the south-west corner of the Exchange Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The highlights should be reduced. --Ermell 21:56, 8 March 2020 (UTC) @Ermell:  Done --Bobulous 20:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exchange House seen from Exchange Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals should be fixed. --Ermell 21:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC) @Ermell:  Done --Bobulous 20:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finsbury Avenue Square in winter sun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exchange House in the low winter sun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you please straighten verticals? --Podzemnik 03:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC) @Podzemnik:  Done --Bobulous 22:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC) Sorry but the right side is leaning out now --Podzemnik 21:27, 11 March 2020 (UTC) @Podzemnik: Another attempt made, this time using the assumption that the steel framework is not purely vertical. --Bobulous 12:54, 14 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Not perfect but acceptable. Thanks --Podzemnik 07:03, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of 70 St Mary Axe from Bevis Marks and Heneage Lane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:06, 23 March 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Alexander Leisser 09:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of 70 St Mary Axe from Wormwood Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of 70 St Mary Axe from Bevis Marks and Creechurch Lane.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 22:46, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The tomb of Lady Jane Lumley within Lumley Chapel, Cheam.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose This is a photo of a wall, not the whole interior. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:20, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Comment @Kestreltail: I've modified the scope to specifically limit it to the tomb of Jane Lumley. --Bobulous (talk) 18:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Interior of Lumley Chapel, Cheam to The tomb of Lady Jane Lumley within Lumley Chapel, Cheam --Bobulous (talk) 19:11, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Best in Scope now. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 18:36, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

@Kestreltail: Tack så mycket för din tid. --Bobulous (talk) 21:29, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

• @Bobulous: Varsågod! —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 21:44, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 02:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alkaline battery leakage in a battery holder.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Sorry, but I think this one represents alkaline battery leakage better. I might support this nomination though if the scope is changed (like Alkaline battery leakage inside a product). --pandakekok9 08:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Alkaline battery leakage to Alkaline battery leakage in a battery holder --Bobulous (talk) 18:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Better now, thanks. Best in scope and used. --pandakekok9 01:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
•  Oppose Image implies Duracell leak easier than the other. Charles (talk) 12:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

 Comment I don't see that interpretation at all (and I think the same allegation could be made no matter which brand was shown). I think instead this image shows the peril of mixing different brands/models of battery together, as the different charge of one causes pressure on the older/smaller battery, increasing the likelihood of a leak. I suppose this explanation ought to be added to the image information, though, to make it clear. --Bobulous (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Indeed. I don't see how a scope like "Duracell leak" is valuable at all. If it is, then we would have every brand of battery leaking nominated for VI. pandakekok9 04:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

•  Support - Useful. I disagree with Charles about what this photo shows. No-one should logically make the inference he suggests. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Ezarateesteban 20:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Amiga 500 system.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support I, for one, welcome our new computer and gaming overlords. Best in scope and used. This could potentially be VI too, but imo this nomination has more value. Gaming is not the primary purpose of the Amiga 500 I think, and this photo shows how the 500 is supposed to be used I guess. --pandakekok9 02:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:06, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fear Factory in Saint Petersburg 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, good focus under difficult circumstances, right moment for high ISO --Michielverbeek 19:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Spring Tavern, Ewell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon EOS R with Battery Grip BG-E22 and Mount Adapter EF-EOS R.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 38 St Mary Axe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Well House, Ewell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vincent60030 07:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clapham Lodge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vincent60030 07:51, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bourne Hall, Ewell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 00:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Watch House, Ewell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 00:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 40 High Street, Ewell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Milestone on Brighton Road, Sutton, London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:52, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zip 100 disk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --ReneeWrites 23:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 9 and 11 West Street, Ewell, seen from an angle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --ReneeWrites 23:15, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kensington Expert Mouse Wired Trackball 64325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wall in front of number 2 Wilbury Avenue, front of south boundary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acer Swift 3 rear-right edge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 16:16, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chessington House, Ewell.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments matching technical QI criteria, but Chessington house is pretty much blocked from view --Virtual-Pano 08:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC) The house isn't open to the public, and this view is the only one visible without permission to enter the gate. Plus, I liked the front garden and the way its trees frame the entryway. --Bobulous 16:40, 2 October 2020 (UTC) I think too much on the left is out of focus, but that's my subjective opinion and I would neither support or decline. However the image should be categorized (you categorized the where but not the what), and if you have photographed the entrance to the house (all that's accessible) you should describe it as such. --Trougnouf 14:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC) Category added, description adjusted. --Bobulous 16:07, 11 October 2020 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 08:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Miles Hall, Cheam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please remove the branches in left top corner --Michielverbeek 20:39, 19 October 2020 (UTC)  Done I've cropped out the left edge to get rid of the blurry branches and to concentrate attention on the building itself. --Bobulous 18:43, 20 October 2020 (UTC) Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canon RF 50mm F1.2L USM, with lens hood.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Bobulous,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Building on the waterfront in Rönnäng.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

"campaign203@ISA"

What is the meaning of "campaign203@ISA" in several captions you have recently added? - Jmabel ! talk 00:34, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Jmabel.

I was participating recently in the "Tell Us About Her: Women in architecture" campaign (whose URL ends with the number 203) using the ISA Tool. Possibly the edits have been tagged with "campaign203@ISA" to aid the organisers in studying how effective this campaign has been at getting people to participate using the tool.

But I'm hoping that "campaign203@ISA" has not appeared inside any of the caption text itself. If you've seen this happening in any of my edits, can you point me to them so I can see what's happened?

Bobulous (talk) 16:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

I see, it's just in the comment. Normally the comment for adding a caption gives the caption verbatim; I didn't even look and see that in this case it didn't. - Jmabel ! talk 17:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

It is only in the comment area and this happens for every edit you make using ISA (any campaign). Anthere (talk) 07:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your Tell Us About Her on ISA 2022 prize

Hello user:Bobulous!

I hope this meets you well.

I am Afek from Wiki In Africa.

Congratulations on winning the 2nd prize in the ISA campaign.

To send your prize to you, we need the some informations from you, please make a copy of this document, fill it and send it to my Wiki In Africa official email afek@wikiinafrica.org .

Cheers!

Afek

I second Afek91 comment... great job ! Anthere (talk)

File:Orazio Gentileschi - Danaë and the Shower of Gold - 2016.6 - J. Paul Getty Museum.jpg

I undid your edits on this image. You removed the correct painting and added the wrong one. Multichill (talk) 18:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, @Multichill.

I remember adjusting the "Depicts" items for that image, and I remember that it made sense at the time. But looking at the two images and the existing "Depicts" entries, I now can't work out what I saw that caused me to adjust them. (On this subject, should the holding museum be mentioned in the Wikidata "Description" to make it harder to confuse two so similar items?) Bobulous (talk) 21:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

That's quite common. I updated Danaë (Q22329907): painting by Orazio Gentileschi (J. Paul Getty Museum) & Danaë (Q29053312): painting by Orazio Gentileschi (Cleveland Museum of Art).

Good example of this is Bedroom in Arles (Q18543956): painting by Vincent van Gogh in the musée d'Orsay, Paris, Bedroom in Arles (Q18713070): painting by Vincent van Gogh located in the Van Gogh Museum, Amsterdam & Bedroom in Arles (Q18713076): painting by Vincent van Gogh in the Art Institute of Chicago. Multichill (talk) 09:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Please test new feature on the ISA Tool (computer-aided tagging)

Hello

We have just released a new version of the ISA tool on the Test Server. The new version propose semi-automatic tagging of images, which seeks to assist community in identifying and labelling depicts statements for Commons files.

We are currently looking for feedback with regards to the look, feel, and usability of the tool with the machine vision / metadata-to-concept enhancements in place. In a second stage, we will be testing the quality of the recommandations provided.

We deeply appreciate your feedback, since it will help us determine the next steps of the project.

Please sign-up to indicate interest, test the tool, and simply provide feedback in the talk page.

More information on the new feature and test campaign: Commons:ISA Tool/Image to Concept

Thank you in advanceǃ

User:Anthere

ISA Tool Workshop - Dec 12th 2022

Greetings.

We released a few weeks ago a new version of the ISA tool on the Test Server. The new version propose semi-automatic tagging of images, which seeks to assist community in identifying and labelling depicts statements for Commons files.

Now we are looking for feedback with regards to

• the look, feel, and usability of the tool with the machine vision / metadata-to-concept enhancements in place.
• and most importantly, the quality of the recommandations provided.

This is why we are organizing an online workshop on Monday 12th of December, 16h-17h30 UTC+1 (on zoom). We will be very happy if you find the time to join us.

More information and sign-up : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:ISA_Tool/Image_to_Concept#ISA_Workshop_-_Dec_12th

Thank you in advanceǃ

User:Anthere

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 14 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at 28 October 2024, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:13, 16 October 2024 (UTC)