User talk:Bluegoblin7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Your Request for License reviewer status was successful

[edit]

I have assigned you the image-reviewer right. Please review Commons:License review one more time before you start reviewing images. If you have any questions about reviewing you can ask here or on my talk page. Thank you for offering to help review images, MorganKevinJ(talk) 04:25, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the 'promotion'! Will get to work on reviewing licenses when I get a spare moment later tonight. Thanks again, Goblin 18:21, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cardiff 131.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Cardiff 131.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

VernoWhitney (talk) 17:54, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Goblin 18:20, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Over-categorized labyrinth images

[edit]

Hi Bluegoblin7, unfortunately you over-categorized your many images of the interesting London Underground labyrinths. Please read Commons:Categories to understand why images should not be over-categorized. I will help you correcting the categories in a few minutes. Please don't be shocked when the categories suddenly look different. Greetings -- Ies (talk) 06:53, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS permissions queues

[edit]

Hello Bluegoblin7. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:BR arrows.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:40, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]