User talk:Binabik

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Binabik155)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Binabik155!

Kanō Sanraku ..

[edit]

Bonjour Binabik 155

J'ai finalement réussi cette démarche. Par contre j'ai deux autres images qui ne sont pas catégorisées, j'ai pourtant fait ce qu'il fallait faire, et je n'ai pas compris comment les reprendre. Je peux toujours téléverser un nouveau dossier, mais...ce n'est peut-être ce qu'il ne faut pas faire. Je n'ai encore jamais eu ce problème. Si vous savez comment faire, pouvez-vous me l'expliquer. J'ai déjà posé cette question, sans avoir de réponse. voici les images concernées:

File:Prune sur paravent.jpg

File:Pivoine sur paravent. 1. Du peintre japonais Kanō Sanraku.jpg . J'évite les crochets pour ne pas activer. Merci pour votre aide. Cordialement--Colibrix (talk) 18:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai créé Creator:Kanō Sanraku : ce modèle se met dans une page dédiée dans l'espace Creator. L'intérêt est (notamment) de pouvoir ensuite insérer dans toutes les images créés par cette personne le modèle Creator:Kanō Sanraku dans le champ Author.--Bapti 14:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK merci bien. C'est la première fois que je manipule cet espace de nom (Creator:), mais je pense que j'ai saisis maintenant. Bonne soirée, Binabik (d) 21:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, please don't nominate for speedy deletion if {{PD-textlogo}} applies. Jcb (talk) 10:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kegon Engi Emaki

[edit]

Hi! Are you sure that all of the images in Category:Kegon_Engi_Emaki are from the National Treasure scroll at Kozan-ji? I haven't checked but stylistically they seem to be from different works. Could also be that they are from the same work, with different settings for contrast and white balance, so I am not sure. Compare for instance File:History of the Kegon Sect.jpg (which is definitely from the National Treasure scroll) and File:Kegon Engi Emaki, Gengyo nightmare.jpg. bamse (talk) 09:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

LargeImage removal

[edit]

Hi, if you disagree with removal of LargeImage template from the files (where it is appropriate), just revert the change, bot will not remove it again. There were already some disscusions about it, Dschwen is insisting on removing, but forutenately no so hard to revert. --Jklamo (talk) 21:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Autopatrol given

[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:52, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


File:Gujo Odori.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yasu (talk) 15:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kitakyūshū wards.png

[edit]

I found that this map has an error. Kitakyushu is consisted of seven wards but in this map, there are two Yahata-Higashi. The yellow-green ward in the right should be Yahata-nishi. If possible could you replace it with the correct one. Thank you very much.Forever elementary student (talk) 03:10, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Nikki has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Themightyquill (talk) 22:27, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cebu Port Passenger Terminal (Cebu City; 09-05-2022).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]