User talk:Alvesgaspar/archive41

Eagle owl pictures

Hello Alvesgaspar,

my son is busy with school homework, where he has to make a poster about an animal. He choes the eagle owl. As I knew that Commons nearly always has illustrating material for this kind of endeavour, we came across your eagle owl pictures (e.g. this one). They will surely find some use for us, of course, I'll take care to respect the license. I just wanted to leave you a note and a thank. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 23:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

• Thank you very much for your attention. Et bonne chance avec le poster! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:47, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Misidentified image

• 
  misidentified image
• 
  Verbascum lychnitis (white form)
• 
  Verbascum lychnitis (yellow form)

Hi Alvesgaspar/archive41, your image File:Verbascum Helsinki July 2013-1.jpg cannot show Verbascum lychnitis, but some other species from the same genus, because the filament hairs are violet instead of white. Unfortunately, there are numerous species of mullein with violet filament hairs, such as Verbascum nigrum, Verbascum chaixii and many other species. Therefore, I do not think it would be wise to assign a species ID to such an image from a botanical garden. I changed the ID to an unidentified species of Verbascum. Sincerely, --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:51, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Aveiro March 2012-12.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Paris July 2011-27a.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:02, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dragonfly Porto Covo August 2021-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Bwag 13:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dragonfly Porto Covo August 2021-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Bwag 13:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:55, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo August 2021-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:55, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dragonfly Porto Covo August 2021-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sorry guys, a wrong version was uploaded. It is fixed now. Alvesgaspar 13:09, 9 September 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 03:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo August 2021-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Please add coordinates as well so that we know exactly where this thing is. --Hillopo2018 07:22, 14 September 2021 (UTC) * Done -- Alvesgaspar 09:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2021-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo August 2021-25b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo August 2021-26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo August 2021-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:42, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2021-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morgavel August 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2021-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fly June 2020-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2021-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dragonfly Porto Covo August 2021-4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dragonfly Porto Covo August 2021-4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:49, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo March 2020-13a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo March 2020-10a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:39, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and beautiful The sky is without definition, but this is almost inevitable under these cirucumstances and does not reduce the effect of the photo. --Aristeas 06:09, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spider & fly April 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:33, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Latin translation

Hello my dear Admiral !
Happy to read from you !
I never stopped to come here and there on Commons, but only for corrections or small things… many other things to manage but now, since just one week, I am re-ti-red ! At least ! And very happy with that. I definitely will leave Paris soon, half for Greece, and half for Dordogne (Périgueux) a good place for wine and good french traditional food ! Close to Portugal by the way !
About your sentence, I agree with you for the first part (very complicated building of the phrase… decadent latin I think). The second part is not understandable word by word. But it has a special meaning for Portuguese, and only for them I guess. Maybe a latin translation of a portuguese sentence or proverb. It is about a « guide to America » ! Try with google translate this second part (only) from latin to french, or to portuguese: it works ! Tell me !
I am curious if you have an explanation. Enjoy, my friend !--Jebulon (talk) 21:25, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Hello my dear friend,

Have a look page 50 !

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330285320_A_conquista_da_sabedoria_A_pintura_de_quadratura_e_o_programa_iconografico_da_Biblioteca_Joanina/fulltext/5d1ce77c299bf1547c954d3c/A-conquista-da-sabedoria-A-pintura-de-quadratura-e-o-programa-iconografico-da-Biblioteca-Joanina.pdf?origin=publication_detail

--Jebulon (talk) 16:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:37, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fátima September 2021-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-7b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very minor crop (a mm or so) from top and right sides would improve the symmetry. --Dey.sandip 16:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC) I did it but the real problem is the lack of top-down symmetry, because it is not possible to stand right below the center of the dome. -- Alvesgaspar 22:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good enough then. --Dey.sandip 06:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2021-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I will support, good quality in my opinion. --Andrey Korzun 12:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main facade of Mosteiro da Batalha, Portugal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anax ephippiger (Vagrant Emperor) Female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Modification of the scope in accordance with the rules of VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Chicago September 2016-21.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chicago September 2016-21.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fátima September 2021-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There are some strange white spots at the top left border, also a spot in the right top corner --Poco a poco 19:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC) * Done Thank you Poco a poco, those were cloning artefacts. Fixed now. Alvesgaspar 21:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC) You removed one at the top right but if you check the left border from top to bottom you'll see a few more --Poco a poco 20:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)  Done You are right, thanks -- Alvesgaspar 21:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines October 2021-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Check the wall, please. There are two possibly dust spots --Ezarate 00:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)  Question Could you please identify the zones? Alvesgaspar 14:57, 10 October 2021 (UTC) see notes --Ezarate 19:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)  Info No dust spots Ezarate, just stains in the limestone wall. That would be strange with this large aperture. Alvesgaspar 19:14, 11 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 18:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines October 2021-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines October 2021-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments You should reframe bottom and right side of the picture --Velvet 07:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)  Done Sorry for the clumsiness! -- Alvesgaspar 15:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

QI and Qitem

I just did this kind of dumb kids story at wikisource. I mention it now because there was an old man in it who kept saying "In my childhood——" I kept thinking about when I first went back to QI everytime I read, proofed or whatever'd, that line.

Then you show up at QI and, it is much the same, only you are (as always) far more eloquent.

What I have been doing, is when I see some of the plants at wikidata show up in my watchlist, I check out the images being used. The images at wikidata show up in the infoboxen here. Flickr images, I remove immediately. There is almost always a good commoner image to use. If I see one of yours, I put it there. I recognize yours for the file name, usually, and second, the composition.

QI isn't being run by biologists (lovers and documenters of life) any longer. WD needs more "commons" representation, I think. I have found a challenge there because the book people don't really regard the illustrator as a going thing, but for cats here, it makes a huge difference for books with multiple illustrators. That is were I "slinked" off to....

The images at wikidata: there is a "qualifier" (I don't know how familiar you are with WD) for "media legend" which accepts one name per language. I have been putting the English common name into that. It displays in the infobox, according to your language settings. Category:Typha latifolia is an example of one that doesn't have an English media legend. And I don't know about using a labeled image there. There is an option somewhere in preferences that adds a "purge", so, with that, it is kind of fun to make things right at WD and then purge the page here and see everything be right here.

They just changed "taxon name" to not require a language, which I found to be kind of funny in a sad way.

OH! One more thing about the images at WD: it accepts more than one image and there is a toggle for ranking (Preferred, normal and deprecated). If you add an image, do toggle the "preferred", that is the way to leave the other image there and have yours show first to anything calling the image for that Qitem. You for sure toggle to preferred for your choice, if you decide to work on those.

I am so glad you are back, because "In my childhood——"--RaboKarbakian (talk) 01:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines October 2021-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I like the position --Michielverbeek 19:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pessegueiro October 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines October 2021-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 23:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forte do Pessegueiro September 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Splendid view! IMHO a bit too much sharpening, but maybe this is a matter of taste. --Aristeas 07:22, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines October 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines October 2021-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Batalha September 2021-4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Batalha September 2021-4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2020-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2020-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:47, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2020-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Wow,featured? --Commonists 20:32, 5 November 2021 (UTC) This one is already featured -- Alvesgaspar 01:37, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo Lisboa November 2021-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:23, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rendufe March 2016-7a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tibães March 2016-22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:48, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stained-glass Antwerp 3a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto April 2019-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 21:25, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Upper Canada College.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Upper Canada College.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo Lisboa November 2021-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo Lisboa November 2021-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:45, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo Lisboa November 2021-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo Lisboa November 2021-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:08, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo Lisboa November 2021-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo Lisboa November 2021-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but there is dust spot (top left) --Poco a poco 18:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC) * Done Thanks, there were three... Alvesgaspar 20:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC) Well, they were at least 4, I found another one in the top right corner, sorry for that --Poco a poco 18:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)  Done You are right, I need a larger magnifying glass! Alvesgaspar 18:27, 9 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, sharp fore and background --Michielverbeek 18:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo November 2021-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:18, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo Lisboa November 2021-17a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo Lisboa November 2021-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 07:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo November 2021-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vasco Gama Sines Novermber 2021-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:10, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo November 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:43, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo November 2021-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. What about 3:4 with less sky? --XRay 04:52, 17 November 2021 (UTC)  Comment You are quite right XRay, I'll do it after QIC -- Alvesgaspar 14:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 06:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 06:57, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 07:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa June 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The bottom of the dog at the right side should be cropped out and the verticals are easy to fix. --Ermell 13:41, 16 November 2021 (UTC)  Done Very good eye for the dog, thanks! Concerning the verticals, I don't really see the need. Please check the on-going discussion in the QIC talk page. -- Alvesgaspar 13:51, 16 November 2021 (UTC) The signs are definitely crooked, but the lamps are vertical, aren't they? I have followed the discussion, but that certainly does not mean that nothing must be vertical. --Ermell 23:13, 16 November 2021 (UTC)  Done You are right, but that is difficult to see and not easy to fix. I think it's alright now -- Alvesgaspar 23:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)  Support ok now. Thanks. --Ermell 09:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo November 2021-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 20:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo November 2021-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! -- MJJR 21:20, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:56, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampa Florida November 2013-10a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caldas Rainha February 2015-1b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guerreiro Templário Cutileiro Almourol November 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Hight QI--Lmbuga 15:07, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa June 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabo Espichel March 2015-2b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: White should be improved and more structure in the dark parts. --XRay 04:44, 21 November 2021 (UTC)  Comment Not possible, already on the limits (bw is tricky) -- Alvesgaspar 09:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo March 2013-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But: IMO white should be improved. --XRay 08:38, 21 November 2021 (UTC)  Done But already on the borderline of blown whites -- Alvesgaspar 09:01, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plowed Earth Alentejo November 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kali April 2016-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamp March 2016-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:09, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zodiac sculptures 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:06, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo 5 setembro 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some dust spots and the empty space at the left should be removed. --Ermell 19:30, 21 November 2021 (UTC)  Done Sorry, a new version was uploaded. There is a strange irregular line in the sky, looking like a trail, that is not an artefact. Should be some kind of meteo phenomenon. -- Alvesgaspar 21:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:53, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Repair Gradient Color

Hi can you help me fix the gradient color of this file File:WiktionaryBan.svg? The red gradient can be displayed in Inkscape but not displayed in browser

Thanks, Chinamoonroll (talk) 11:05, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colombo Lisboa November 2021-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 23:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cabo Sardão October 2021-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 23:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Azenha do Mar October 2021-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 21:14, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2021-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:40, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sines November 2021-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:24, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcobaça October 2021-18a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcobaça October 2021-23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phalaenopsis July 2020-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Celosia argentia July 2020-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcobaça October 2021-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-47.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcobaça October 2021-12a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:09, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Asteracea April 2020-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:57, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Alcobaça October 2021-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alcobaça October 2021-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Batalha September 2021-53.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Batalha September 2021-53.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcobaça October 2021-37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 00:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamp Porto Covo December 2021-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamp Porto Covo December 2021-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Parsa 2au 10:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lamp Porto Covo December 2021-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:05, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osteorpermum montage 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:10, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcobaça October 2021-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Osteospermum ecklonis (Flowers of Cape Marguerite).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the english common name in parenthesis. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:46, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso September 2015-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Great Photos Subashshamis (talk) 08:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nepeta July 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Identify and give a category for the insect if you can. -- Ikan Kekek 02:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cistus May 2014-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:45, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:05, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Giovanni Battista Gislene.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Good image, useful and often used -- Spurzem (talk) 18:51, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:31, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cyclura nubila July 2015-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality! --Radomianin 23:45, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cistus April 2008-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:16, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Batalha September 2021-56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:55, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:14, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Osteorpermum montage 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Osteorpermum montage 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albert Memorial London July 2015-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:52, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Santa Maria del Popolo September 2015-3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria del Popolo September 2015-3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuchsia October 2014-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:14, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Compass rose Lopo Homem 1.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:09, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dioscorea July 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:42, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cardona March 2015-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality, I recommend the golden ratio for the image division. You can take away a bit from this empty blue sky, so that the horizon is higher then the middle of the image. The more subtle colors of the previous versions look more natural to me.--Milseburg 21:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)  Done You are right, it was overdone. Fixed now, including small crop -- Alvesgaspar 13:18, 19 December 2021 (UTC)  Support --Milseburg 14:40, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

	✴ Happy Holidays, Alvesgaspar ✴
	Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Желаю вам счастливого Рождества и Нового года! --Aristeas (talk) 18:19, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schizler's celestial globe (1575).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Banded garden spider (Argiope trifasciata), ventral view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & Used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olympus IS-1000 analog camera.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --August Geyler (talk) 17:40, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium martagon July 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allium May 2013-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urtiga January 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Callistemon January 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arctotheca April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barcelona March 2015-7a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barcelona March 2015-1b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:49, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2021/2022!

		* Happy Holidays 2021/2022, Alvesgaspar! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Inflorescence of Freesia leichtlinii (Dune freesia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment This is not a cluster but an inflorescence, and the correct name is freesia leichtlinii, the image is in the right category.
• It takes a geocoding in the caption and the vernacular name in English in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Done Geocode added. There is no common English name that I know, the plant is usually named as Freesia alba -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:03, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment They are not flowers but an inflorescence, and the correct name is freesia leichtlinii, the image is in the right category. There is a vernacular name in English for this species: dune freesia, which must be put in the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:29, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barcelona March 2015-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 13:40, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fuchsia October 2014-1a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fuchsia October 2014-1a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osteospermum March 2008-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 20:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bubo September 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:38, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Freesia February 2013-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Freesia February 2013-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pairs of flowers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cistus montage 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Poster Gazania 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 December 2021 (UTC)