User talk:Ahsoous
Estonian translations needed
[edit]Hi! I contact you as you speak English and Estonian.
Jastrow and I are working on autotranslating {{Meta information museum}}, the meta-template we use for many museums, like {{Information Louvre}}. Could you please help us find Estonian translations for every tag name:
* artist/maker * description * dimensions * credit line * accession number * location * source/photographer * references * other versions
"Credit line" is mainly about the mode of acquisition: what collection does it come from? Did it join the collections by gift, purchase, on loan, etc.?
Thanks for any help. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 10:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Lets try:
- kunstnik/looja
- kirjeldus
- mõõdud
- omandisuhted
- inventarinumber
- asukoht
- allikas/fotograaf
- viited
- teised versioonid
"omandisuhted" kirjeldavad peamiselt teose omandamise viisi: kust kogu pärineb? Kas see on saadud kingitusena, ostes, laenuks, jne.? --Ahsoous (talk) 16:08, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry but, as I don't speak Estonian at all, I can't understand your last sentence. Could you try it in English/French/German? Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 16:44, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- I just created the appropriate subtemplate. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 16:47, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- I simply translated Your last sentence, maybe its helpful for others, when they submit information - Ahsoous (talk) 18:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- My mistake; I should have guess. Thanks a lot! Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 20:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
- I simply translated Your last sentence, maybe its helpful for others, when they submit information - Ahsoous (talk) 18:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Kristjan Palusalu haud 20110906 by Ahsoous.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]Dear Ahsoous,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:10, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- corrected -- Ahsoous (talk) 23:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Missing arguments
[edit]Hello. You declined my picture with a spurious argument. The size of the file plays no role, only for the MP does. For the latter there is a threshold of 2 megapixels but this picture has 5 times more. I don't want to believe that your hollow decline was due to my decline of your picture (I see that it was the first at all that you proposed). Please, act in consecuence an either retire your comment or provide valid arguments, and read the guidelines to review pictures for QI. I would also ask you to consider first gaining some experience in the page before you review the work of others. Me, for example, started reviewing pictures from other users after 100 of my pictures were granted QI. Poco a poco (talk) 21:18, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- Seems that we both wrote messages to each other in the same time (when I saved my message I noticed that here). Hope that this isn't problem. -- Ahsoous (talk) 21:34, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- No, that is not a problem. I don't agree with your comments and can guarantee that I didn't compress it too much or whatever. I do believe that -although that is not for sure the picture of the year- meets the QI criteria, therefore I will ask for an additional opinion. Poco a poco (talk) 21:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC) PD: When you leave a message, please, open a section.
- There are maybe things what we understand differently. For me - that picture isn't bad, but quality isn't the best. Really I think if You resampled/resized that image for example to 3Mpix then that image will look much better. But if You noticed that thing, that image what I propose, was the first one, what I proposed, then I must say also, that I thought its 101st(?) picture of mine, which is in wikimedia commons, and even one picture I can propose. I think that these pictures of mine 1 and 2 are maybe even better, but after Your comment I think, it's probably better not to suggest these. Or what do You think? -- Ahsoous (talk) 23:05, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
- No, that is not a problem. I don't agree with your comments and can guarantee that I didn't compress it too much or whatever. I do believe that -although that is not for sure the picture of the year- meets the QI criteria, therefore I will ask for an additional opinion. Poco a poco (talk) 21:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC) PD: When you leave a message, please, open a section.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Robert Vaigla 20110716 by Ahsoous.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!Dear Ahsoous, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, |
- Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 17:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)