User talk:Agnes Monkelbaan/Archive 2

Agnes Monkelbaan/Archive 1: 2016

Quality Image Promotion

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Begonia grandis 'claret jug' 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:32, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC) --QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ochtendmist hangt over 'It Wikelslân. Locatie, De Alde Feanen in Friesland 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zilvergrijze ridderzwam (Tricholoma scalpturatum) Locatie, Hortus (Haren, Groningen) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ochtendmist hangt over 'It Wikelslân. Locatie, De Alde Feanen in Friesland 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:54, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ochtendmist hangt over 'It Wikelslân. Locatie, De Alde Feanen in Friesland 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Collybia zwam. (Agaricus subrufescens). Locatie, Hortus (Haren, Groningen) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:00, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ochtendmist hangt over 'It Wikelslân. Locatie, De Alde Feanen in Friesland 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Fallère, Valle d'Aosta (2415m) 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:27, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationaal Park Drents-Friese Wold. Locatie Dieverzand 012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The signpost is leaning to the left, but perhaps it is same in nature. --Cccefalon 06:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vrouwelijke Skimmia japonica 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Fallère, Valle d'Aosta (2415m) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaaggegordelde gordijnzwam (Cortinarius anomalus). Locatie, Hortus (Haren, Groningen) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:40, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locatie, Mirns Mokkebank, Friese IJsselmeerkust 004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good perspective, ISO200 is perfect, photo is sharp but I only would make the sky a bit darker Ps-selectieve kleur-blauw of cyaan --Michielverbeek 06:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan 08:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationaal Park Drents-Friese Wold. Locatie Dieverzand 003.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Hubertl 17:52, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationaal Park Drents-Friese Wold. Locatie Dieverzand 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locatie, Mirns Mokkebank, Friese IJsselmeerkust 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Fallère, Valle d'Aosta (2415m) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kuifzwam (Helvella crispa). Locatie, Hortus (Haren, Groningen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zicht op IJsselmeer in de bocht van Molkwar (Molkwerum). Locatie, Friese IJsselmeerkust 006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geranium procurrens 0012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:59, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationaal Park Drents-Friese Wold. Locatie Dieverzand 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 06:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 06:47, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zicht op IJsselmeer in de bocht van Molkwar (Molkwerum). Locatie, Friese IJsselmeerkust 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Fallère, Valle d'Aosta (2415m) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locatie, Mirns Mokkebank, Friese IJsselmeerkust 003.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationaal Park Drents-Friese Wold. Locatie Dieverzand 010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationaal Park Drents-Friese Wold. Locatie Dieverzand 008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationaal Park Drents-Friese Wold. Locatie Dieverzand 009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Fallère, Valle d'Aosta (2415m) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Untilt leftover left border, elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 06:04, 22 January 2016 (UTC)  Done. Thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:50, 22 January 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zicht op IJsselmeer in de bocht van Molkwar (Molkwerum). Locatie, Friese IJsselmeerkust 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:10, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zicht op IJsselmeer in de bocht van Molkwar (Molkwerum). Locatie, Friese IJsselmeerkust 004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:03, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zicht op IJsselmeer in de bocht van Molkwar (Molkwerum). Locatie, Friese IJsselmeerkust 005.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Fallère, Valle d'Aosta (2415m) 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:07, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Fallère, Valle d'Aosta (2415m) 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:11, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:37, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Fallère, Valle d'Aosta (2415m) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 040.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:47, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Fallère, Valle d'Aosta (2415m) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:51, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lago Fallère, Valle d'Aosta (2415m) 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:51, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:51, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:47, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some magenta CA to be removed, elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 06:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:21, 6 February 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:34, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:30, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:50, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Homene Dessus, Combellin, Valle d'Aosta 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:41, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:01, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 06:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you reduce the noise a little bit? I think the picture has a touch of a magenta cast, too. Please check the WB. --Code 06:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)  Done. Noise Reduction + WB. correction.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:55, 15 February 2016 (UTC)  Support Much better. Good quality. --Code 06:13, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:50, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:56, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Please check your image. It's tilted CW. --XRay 07:06, 21 February 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)  Support Sharpness isn't the best, but IMO OK for QI now. --XRay 17:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough to be a Q1one, I am talking about sharpness, perspective and kleurbeleving (the way how I experience the colours) --Michielverbeek 06:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the main object, but I would have like to see more of the tree in the water - meer weerspiegeling van de boom in het water --Michielverbeek 06:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC) Antwoord: u heeft gelijk, maar omdat het moerassig was kon ik niet dichterbij komen.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:53, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:05, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:01, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality but there is a bit too much contrast IMO --Christian Ferrer 06:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:12, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:00, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:00, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good focus to the main object --Michielverbeek 06:16, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonievene. Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:42, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:18, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition, but unfortunately oversharpened, please reduce sharpness or redevelop in LR verscherpen-hoeveel 68 en ruisreductie-luminantie 25 --Michielverbeek 06:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC) Good enough to be a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 06:16, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:37, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. maybe a bit to yelloish, but ok for me --Hubertl 06:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. maybe a bit to yelloish, but ok for me --Hubertl 06:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:58, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:41, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:18, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:01, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Homene Dessus naar Vens in Valle d'Aosta. Lac du Joux (1930m) boven Vens in Valle d'Aosta 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:55, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Villeneuve in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hm, yeah, ok for me --Hubertl 10:15, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:17, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:55, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now. --Ermell 08:36, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Villeneuve in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:01, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:43, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië) 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Villeneuve in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:02, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergtocht van Vens naar Bettex in Valle d'Aosta (Italië) 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:49, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:48, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:36, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:53, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:04, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:42, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:25, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:08, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:41, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:05, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:48, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van Catspoele 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:57, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:50, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 06:00, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 038.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice. --Johann Jaritz 05:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very nice and good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:47, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:22, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 037.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:25, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:04, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:53, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Delleboersterheide – Catspoele Natuurgebied van It Fryske Gea. Omgeving van het heideveld 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:02, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:49, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:37, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:14, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:26, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:32, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:03, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:42, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer In de provincie Friesland 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:51, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:55, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:53, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp enough for a Q1photo, good composotion, good bottom crop --Michielverbeek 05:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:00, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Johann Jaritz 04:37, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:34, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer In de provincie Friesland 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. BTW: You can use interwiki links to Wikipedia instead of the additional description of the nature reserve. --XRay 04:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC) Note: Thank you for your comments. Question: what do you mean exactly?--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)  Comment Please have a look to the description of your image. I've already added the interwiki links. --XRay 16:41, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:25, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oostvaardersplassen. Nieuwe natuur op de bodem van de voormalige Zuiderzee 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer In de provincie Friesland 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 04:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer In de provincie Friesland 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer in de provincie Friesland 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer In de provincie Friesland 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer In de provincie Friesland 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:35, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer in de provincie Friesland 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer in de provincie Friesland 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be better without the two branches top left. They could be cloned out. --XRay 05:41, 25 June 2016 (UTC)  Done. Thank you.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:52, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer In de provincie Friesland 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:38, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer in de provincie Friesland 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:00, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer In de provincie Friesland 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:35, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer in de provincie Friesland 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer In de provincie Friesland 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:30, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer in de provincie Friesland 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer In de provincie Friesland 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:57, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beekdal Linde Bekhofplas. Een waardevol natuurterrein van Staatsbosbeheer in de provincie Friesland 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Over categorization, categories removed) --XRay 06:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)