User talk:2017-CMI

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, 2017-CMI!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:39, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kreuznach again, Kreuznach for ever ?

[edit]

Bonjour ! ça n'a rien de mystérieux, mais c'est un "challenge cartographique". Je tenterais bien une dernière solution en floutant les couleurs sans tracer de lignes, mais avant, une question : la Vistule autour de Plotsk et la Narew sont bien frontalières, ou bien c'est flou là aussi ? Merci ! Si ce n'est toujours pas bon, il n'y a qu'à effacer la carte? D'accord ? --Claude Zygiel (talk) 10:16, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Claude Zygiel, rien n'est précis dans ce domaine. C'est pour cela qu'aucune carte n'est possible : les choix que tu vas opérer ne rendront en réalité compte que des options privilégiées par l'un des acteurs (OHL, cabinet prussien, Chancellerie impériale, Auswärtiges Amt, milieux économiques, ministères de la guerre, qu'il soit prussien ou impérial, Reichsbank... et j'en oublie sûrement), sans oublier que ces acteurs ont proposé différents tracés au fil du conflit : en 1916, c'est relativement simple, en 1918, c'est plus compliqué, sans que la paix entre les puissances centrales et l'Ukraine complique le tracé de la frontière entre la Pologne et l'Ukraine... 2017-CMI (talk) 10:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Eh oui, mais je n'arrive pas à retrouver graphiquement ces divers tracés proposés... où peuvent bien être les archives de Kreuznach ? Pas à Varsovie ni à Berlin en tout cas. D'ailleurs je pense même que les dessiner tous, ces tracés proposés, compliquerait trop la carte. Je la laisse donc en flou de coloris, sans tracés précis, sauf là où les participants à Kreuznach se sont mis d'accord (Narew, Vistule autour de Plotsk, Galicie austro-hongroise et zone de Chelm attribuée à l'Ukraine). Si jamais quelqu'un estime qu'il vaut mieux ne pas avoir de carte de ce "Royaume" mais se contenter de la carte des zones d'occupation du Royaume du Congrès, libre à lui (ou elle) de la supprimer. Pas de souci. Cordialement, --Claude Zygiel (talk) 10:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour, une carte du royaume de Pologne constitué en 1916 est une bonne chose, mais ne doit pas être trop précise quant au tracé de ses frontières, au contraire de ce qui est proposé ici, qui rend compte des projets du printemps 1918 avec une large bande frontalière allemande. celle-ci est moins imprécise, mais à l'échelle du continent. Bonne journée. 2017-CMI (talk) 11:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Great Cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo), Little Egret (Egretta garzetta) and Gadwall (Mareca strepera) in Nepal.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2023 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2022 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!

[edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.


Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]