User talk:120
Thank you for uploading files on Commons.
Please add license tag(s) (see Commons:Copyright tags for more information) and author/source information. If you did it yourself please say this fact explicitly.
Please add your files to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them.
EugeneZelenko 03:49, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
cartes de Néandertal
[edit]Ces cartes sont-elles libres de droits ?81.57.238.222 17:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- J'ai réalisé ces cartes avec un logiciel de dessin vectoriel en m'inspirant d'une carte trouvée sur le net mais en l'enrichissant et en la corrigeant. Je considère que j'en suis l'auteur, même si ce n'est pas moi qui ai cartographié l'Europe et le Proche-Orient ;) 120 16:36, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
- Done, sorry for the oversight. 120 20:34, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Re: Image:Éclat de silex.png
[edit]Je suis en train d'y faire (on dit comme ça?), merçi pour les corrections--Locutus Borg 21:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)J-M Benito
- Pas de quoi!
have been nominated for deletion. See Template:Deletion_requests#Image:Cussac-1.jpg_and_Image:Cussac-2.jpg (June 6). pfctdayelise (translate?) 13:50, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Lespugue_face.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Lespugue_face.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 22:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Lespugue_dos.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Lespugue_dos.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 22:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
Images sans source ou violant le droit d'auteur
[edit]Bonjour. Je remarque que tu importes de nombreuses images dont tu n'es pas l'auteur et que tu indiques {{PD-art}} ou {{PD-old}}. Sache que lorsqu'il s'agit de reproductions d'œuvres 3D, le photographe réalise un travail créatif qui implique un droit d'auteur. Je me vois donc dans l'obligation de supprimer les images dont tu n'es pas l'auteur. Merci de ta compréhension, et j'espère que tu éviteras d'importer de telles images à l'avenir. Cordialement, guillom 11:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Neandertal time table
[edit]I just saw your picture on Commons. If possible: could you please send me the original file version? I guess you used a vector program like Visio, CorelDraw or similar. Having the original version could for sure "ease" the pain to change the picture for English and German Wikipedia. TIA --Martin0815 (talk) 11:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hello, I forgot to link the .svg version which is also available : Image:Carte Neandertaliens classiques.svg. Best regards, 120 (talk) 09:33, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:41, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:J.Dassié-en-vol.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
File:Eyzies-musée-ours1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 17:23, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Eyzies-musée-mégacéros.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 22:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
File:Eyzies-musée-Cro-Magnon.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 16:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Eyzies-musée-Roc-de-Marsal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 16:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
File:Eyzies-musée-La_Ferrassie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FunkMonk (talk) 16:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Lartet.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lartet.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Rama (talk) 19:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Bonjour, bien reçu le message. Je ne suis pas à mon domicile actuellement et n'ai pas le livre d'où est tirée l'image sous la main mais je m'occupe d'ajouter les informations requises dès que possible. Cordialement, 120 (talk) 20:04, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
- Done 120 (talk) 11:44, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
I nominated this image on the English Wikipedia's featured picture candidates, they wanted some clarification, maybe in the description of how the image was created. --IdLoveOne (talk) 16:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Lascaux-diverticule-félins.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lascaux-diverticule-félins.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Circeus (talk) 23:27, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
- Done 120 (talk) 11:45, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi 120! Nice work! Thank you! --Bullenwächter ↑ 13:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks ! 120 (talk) 13:50, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
May I use your "Lucy" photo in my children's book?
[edit]Dear 120,
I would like to use your photo in my children's book which I am self-publishing in the United States. I will be printing 2000 copies of the book and it will be published in August 2012 under the title, "Australia to Zimbabwe: A Rhyming Romp Around the World to 24 Countries" I would like to use the Lucyblackbg.jpg on the "E is for Ethiopia" page as that was where they first found Lucy. It's a wonderful photo, the best I've found on the web- thank you for posting it.
If you will permit me to use the photo, please tell me how you would like to be credited. I can put your name and the date the photo was taken, or just the web address of where to find the photo, or both. Just let me know whatever you would prefer.
Thank you for considering my request.
Sincerely, Ruth Fitts rubirubiru
- Dear Ruth, thank you very much for your message and comments. The conditions of use of the picture are explained on this page. I would be very glad if you use my picture (just keep in mind it is a picture of a cast, not of the original fossil). I think you can credit it like this : picture by 120 / Vincent Mourre under free license CC BY-SA 3.0
- I would appreciate if you inform me when the book is published and maybe if you can send me a copy... Best regards, 120 (talk) 22:07, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Eyzies-musée-entrée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
cmadler (talk) 14:29, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Dessin de lucy
[edit]Salut 120,
je voudrais bien utilliser ton image de lucy sur une affiche ce que nous faisons comme projet scolaire pour un muséum. J' espère tu es d' accord avec ca, mais dis-moi s' il te plaît comment tu veux nous d' indiquer ton nom sous l' affiche.
Merci beaucoup
Stefan
TUSC token a498edebc4de3069484767bfe03c126d
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Permission to use image
[edit]Dear 120,
I'm currently writing a popular science book about the evolution of locomotion, to be published next year by Basic Books. May I please include your Lucy blackbg.jpg image, and if this is OK, how would you like to be acknowledged?
Many thanks, and best wishes,
Matt
- Dear Matt, Lucy blackbg.jpg was published under [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html), CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/) or CC BY 2.5 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5)] so you can use it as you wish. Please mention me as the author as "V. Mourre / Inrap". I think you noticed it's a cast and not the original fossil, but it's a good quality cast... Best regards, 120 (talk) 20:41, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
Thanks very much for that. Yes, I spotted that it was a cast, but it does the job! All the best, Matt
Image Use
[edit]Hi There - I'm interested in using your image in an upcoming book can you please contact me? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Venus-de-Laussel-vue-generale.jpg Webandladder (talk) 21:42, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, you can use this image according to the licence indicated here. Please mention me as the author as "V. Mourre / Inrap". If you wish, you can write me at vincent[dot]mourre[at]wanadoo[dot]fr. Kind regards, 120 (talk) 08:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
File:Carte Neandertaliens.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fæ (talk) 14:14, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
File:Homo georgicus.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Dunkleosteus77.
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 14:10, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Homo georgicus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Einsamer Schütze (talk) 21:00, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Carte Neandertaliens.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Carte Neandertaliens.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Fæ (talk) 17:13, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Homo naledi holotype specimen (DH1).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.
|
Fæ (talk) 17:18, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Lascaux plan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Fæ (talk) 17:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Carte Neandertaliens anciens.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Carte Neandertaliens anciens.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Fæ (talk) 08:37, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, I made this map and the other ones listed above some years ago (own work as indicated when I uploaded them). What should I add ?... Regards 120 (talk) 09:17, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2023 voting is open!
[edit]Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2023) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2023.
Round 2 will end at UTC.
If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2024 (UTC)