User talk:Максим Огородник/2021
File:Лист Архівного відділу Чортківської РДА від 25 вересня 2019 року № 605.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anatoliy (talk) 00:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Нові райони Тернопільської области.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Нові райони Тернопільської области.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Нові райони Тернопільської области.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Anatoliy (talk) 01:23, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Нові райони Тернопільської области - Чортківський.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Нові райони Тернопільської области - Чортківський.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Anatoliy (talk) 01:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Чортків - Вулиця Незалежності - Скріншот.JPG
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Чортків - Вулиця Незалежності - Скріншот.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Чортків - Вулиця Незалежності - Скріншот.JPG]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Anatoliy (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Чортків - Вулиця Зелена - Скріншот.JPG
[edit]This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Чортків - Вулиця Зелена - Скріншот.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Anatoliy (talk) 01:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Наказ начальника управління культури Тернопільської ОДА № 124-од від 12 жовтня 2017 року.pdf
[edit]File:Наказ начальника управління культури Тернопільської ОДА № 124-од від 12 жовтня 2017 року.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Doctor Architect (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Наказ начальника управління культури Тернопільської ОДА № 16 від 27 січня 2010 року.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Doctor Architect (talk) 16:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is on!
[edit]You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.
You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.
Kind regards,
Wiki loves Folklore International Team
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Unblock
[edit]I have unblocked your account (technically, reduced the block to 2 hours), following the latest mail you sent me. This is basically per w:en:WP:ROPE, and you should understand that this is really your last chance. Any problems with your account or uploads, and you will be reblocked back, without any future perspectives to be unblocked.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks! I will try not to fail.--Максим Огородник (talk) 05:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ymblanter Good afternoon! My renames break the rules?--Максим Огородник (talk) 09:11, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Вид на перший ставок (Шманьківчики).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Максим Огородник (talk) 15:36, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Вид на село із Шманьківського замку 2016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Максим Огородник (talk) 15:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Каплиця Всіх святих українського народу у Шваківцях.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Максим Огородник (talk) 15:37, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Костел Св. Марії Магдалини у Шманьківці.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Максим Огородник (talk) 15:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Костел Святої Марії Магдалини.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Максим Огородник (talk) 15:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Костел Святої Марії Магдалини у Шманьківцях.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Максим Огородник (talk) 15:39, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Міст через річку (Шманьківчики).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Максим Огородник (talk) 15:40, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Православна церква у Шманькіцях.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Максим Огородник (talk) 15:41, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Могила С.Чарнецького на Личаківському кладовищі у Львові.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Максим Огородник (talk) 15:41, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
Delete
[edit]EugeneZelenko Congratulations! Please delete the files I nominated. Thank you very much!--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't see reason for deletion. Your photos may be useful for Wikipedia, Wikitravel or other WMF projects. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko At least these two (1, 2). Thanks!--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I still don't understand reason - such images are definitely good depiction historical object and could not harm anybody, including you (if privacy is concern). Just think that they could gone for whatever reason (I did photos of similar kind and know that this may be sad truth) - your photos will remain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko Then close the discussion.--Максим Огородник (talk) 16:41, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko Good afternoon! I apologize for not objectively specifying the reasons for deleting files. I want to correct my past mistakes, can I reset the list of files that don't belong to me? There aren't many of them. I repent and admit my mistakes that I made. Regarding this file, I have already contacted the police, who should put a license on their website and the problem will be resolved.--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Could you please provide link to original web site? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't have any, the photo was sent to me via email.--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenkoInstead, I send you links to other people's photos that I uploaded under my own name (1, 2). Now I will also add links to photos that violate the freedom of panoramic shooting. They should be exported to Wikipedia and then deleted on Wikimedia Commons.--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- This doesn't make picture clearly. Also both church and grave look old enough to be in public domain, so Commons:Freedom of panorama is irrelevant. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- And now a list of files that don't belong on Wikimedia Commons (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25). Even though these are all my mistakes. It is advisable to transfer them to Wikipedia. If Ukraine passes a law on the freedom of panoramic photography, then it will be possible to return them here. Thank you.--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenkoInstead, I send you links to other people's photos that I uploaded under my own name (1, 2). Now I will also add links to photos that violate the freedom of panoramic shooting. They should be exported to Wikipedia and then deleted on Wikimedia Commons.--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:31, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't have any, the photo was sent to me via email.--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Could you please provide link to original web site? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko I've offered you a list, and you can decide for yourself. I am trying to correct my mistakes, and I will try not to make any new ones. As for the two photos (1, 2), they need to be deleted - they're not mine.--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:52, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- If photos were taken from somewhere else, please provide proof links. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't have any links, so they were sent to me via my mailbox.--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- I think easiest solution would be to ask photographer to send permission to Commons:OTRS (example: Commons:Email templates). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:10, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I don't have any links, so they were sent to me via my mailbox.--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- If photos were taken from somewhere else, please provide proof links. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko Rename multiple files?--Максим Огородник (talk) 16:37, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko Good afternoon! I apologize for not objectively specifying the reasons for deleting files. I want to correct my past mistakes, can I reset the list of files that don't belong to me? There aren't many of them. I repent and admit my mistakes that I made. Regarding this file, I have already contacted the police, who should put a license on their website and the problem will be resolved.--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:12, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko Then close the discussion.--Максим Огородник (talk) 16:41, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I still don't understand reason - such images are definitely good depiction historical object and could not harm anybody, including you (if privacy is concern). Just think that they could gone for whatever reason (I did photos of similar kind and know that this may be sad truth) - your photos will remain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- EugeneZelenko At least these two (1, 2). Thanks!--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
File tagging File:Богомол Олександр Миколайович.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Богомол Олександр Миколайович.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Микола Василечко (talk) 19:00, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Фото з Чорткова
[edit]Вітаю! Дякую що зацікавилися моїми фото з Чорткова. Я давненько їх робив і давненько там був останній раз. То панорама була з Калічівки, а фото з табличкою якщо не помиляюсь, то це десь у районі мосту як іти з центру до залізничного вокзалу (або й на самій вулиці Залізнична). За Калічівку спробую запитати. --Visem (talk) 19:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Православна церква у Шманькіцях.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:19, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
File:Могила С.Чарнецького на Личаківському кладовищі у Львові.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Максим Огородник (talk) 10:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
File copyright status
[edit]Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. While everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the project, one or more of your file uploads had missing or false information regarding its source and copyright status. Please note that Wikimedia Commons takes copyright rules and infringement very seriously. Files may only be uploaded and included if their copyright status meets the conditions stated in our licensing policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. Files that fail to meet those conditions may be deleted, and users who fail to meet them may be blocked. Please follow our first steps, if you haven't already. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the Village Pump copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:49, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Starts renaming - Warning!
[edit]Stop starts to rename files! Responses of words in files names are not a reason for renaming. The following actions may be blocked! --Микола Василечко (talk) 08:33, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Чортків - Всеукраїнський шаховий турнір - Валентин Гулька.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Чортків - Всеукраїнський шаховий турнір - Валентин Гулька.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Чортків - Всеукраїнський шаховий турнір - Валентин Гулька.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 09:01, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Богомол Олександр Миколайович.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:Богомол Олександр Миколайович.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Богомол Олександр Миколайович.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
Світлини вулиць Шманьківців
[edit]@Микола Василечко: Христос Воскрес! Підкажіть, будь ласка, як краще зробити порядок із файлами в Категорії:Струсівка. Пропоную у фотографіях вулиць замінити Категорія:Струсівка на Вулиця Тараса Шевченка. І ще одне: для мап Струсівки вартувало б створити окрему категорію, чи ні?--Максим Огородник (talk) 15:59, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
«Вікі любить Землю» 2021 в Україні пройде з 1 по 30 червня
[edit]Доброго дня!
Ви брали участь у конкурсі «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні раніше, тож приносимо вам важливу новину — цього року конкурс відбудеться протягом червня.
Як і в попередні роки, долучитися до змагання можуть усі охочі — як професійні фотографи, так і аматори. Головне, щоб ви любили Землю і розділяли ідею конкурсу — представити природно-заповідні території України за допомогою світлин під вільними ліцензіями. У Вікіпедії та Вікісховищі конкурсні фото будуть доступні тисячам людей.
Загальний формат конкурсу буде таким же, як у минулі роки. Протягом травня ми опублікуємо детальні умови та можливості для участі у спеціальних номінацій. Стежте за новинами проєкту у Фейсбуці, Інстаграмі або у блозі. Також ключова інформація буде з'являтися на сторінці у Вікісховищі.
Під час зйомок у заповідних територіях просимо дотримуватися правил їх відвідування і встановлених карантинних обмежень. Найважливіші правила ми зібрали тут.
Сподіваємося на вашу участь у червні! --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 13:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
«Вікі любить Землю» 2021 проходить до 30 червня: Долучайтеся!
[edit]Вітаємо!
До кінця червня триває щорічний конкурс «Вікі любить Землю» в Україні. Його метою є зібрати якомога більшу базу фотографій пам'яток природи України; для переможців передбачені цінні призи у різних номінаціях. Ви брали участь у конкурсі в минулі роки — можливо, вам було б цікаво долучитися і зараз.
- Корисні посилання
- Інструкція з участі
- Перелік номінацій конкурсу
- У четвер 3 червня ми проведемо онлайн-презентацію конкурсу, де розповімо про правила й умови, а також продемонструємо, як взяти у ньому участь (деталі і реєстрація)
Більше інформації — на сайті конкурсу та у соцмережах (Фейсбук • Інстаграм • Телеграм). Якщо у вас є запитання, можете писати на wlewikimedia.org.ua --AntonProtsiuk (WMUA) (обговорення) 15:21, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:ТМР, Ольга Ярмоленко, 2.jpg
[edit]Copyright status: File:ТМР, Ольга Ярмоленко, 2.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:ТМР, Ольга Ярмоленко, 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Світлини
[edit]JuTa Hi there! A similar situation (1, 2).--Максим Огородник (talk) 05:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- What are you tralking about? --JuTa 05:46, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
- The bot indicated that it does not have, although it does.--Максим Огородник (talk) 05:51, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Шманьківці, Старий цвинтар, 916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Чортків, Реконструкція бою Чортківської офензиви під стінами Чортківського замку, 1163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine
[edit]Привіт!
З 1 по 30 вересня вже традиційно пройде українська частина міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»! В Україні цей конкурс пройде вже вдесяте. На конкурс можна подавати власні фото пам'яток історико-культурної спадщини України — і змагатися за призи. Більше можна прочитати за посиланням.
Радимо ознайомитися із детальними правилами, а також із відповідями на часті питання. Як і того року — у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток» можна отримати 21 бал за фотографії об'єктів, якщо світлин цієї пам'ятки раніше не було завантажено.
Нагадаємо, що всі фотографії автоматично беруть участь у номінації «За найбільшу кількість сфотографованих пам’яток»; однак для того, щоб фото позмагалося у номінації «Найкраще фото», потрібно підтвердити це при завантаженні.
Цього року вперше будуть окремо виділені фото з повітря (дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо) — у спеціальній номінації «Аерофото». Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі.
Також вперше проводиться спеціальна номінація «Пам'ятки Подесення», знову пройдуть спецномінації «Відео», «Єврейська спадщина», «Млини», «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» та «Via Regia Ukraine». Для участі світлин у цих спецномінаціях не потрібно обирати нічого у Завантажувачі — світлини зараховуватимуться автоматично з відповідних списків.
Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.
Приєднуйтеся!
Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.
Важливо! Цього року відбулася адміністративно-територіальна реформа. Однак, ми проводимо конкурс ще за попереднім адміністративно-територіальним устроєм. Ми почали роботу над створенням списків з новим поділом, але вона ще не є завершена. Ви можете користуватися тими новими списками, що вже є, якщо потрібно відшукати пам'ятку за новим поділом (деякі ОДА вже почали присилати у такому форматі), але пам'ятайте, що нові списки ще не є повними.
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки».17:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
File tagging File:24 канал, Парад до Дня Незалежності 2021, Пліш Богдан Йосипович, 2021-08-24.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:24 канал, Парад до Дня Незалежності 2021, Пліш Богдан Йосипович, 2021-08-24.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:24 канал, Парад до Дня Незалежності 2021, Пліш Богдан Йосипович, 2021-08-24.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Kharkivian (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
- KharkivianАналогічних завантажень є вдосталь. Може, ви припинете мене переслідувати???--Максим Огородник (talk) 04:37, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні триває до 30 вересня / Wiki Loves Monuments 2021 in Ukraine is on till September 30
[edit]Привіт!
Нагадуємо, що до 30 вересня включно можна вантажити світлини та відео культурної спадщини України до національного етапу міжнародного фотоконкурсу «Вікі любить пам'ятки»!
Зараз Україна посідає 3-є місце за кількістю завантажених світлин, поступаючись Російській Федерації та Німеччині. За першу половину місяця було завантажено світлини пам'яток із усіх регіонів України, але частина із них є дуже погано представлена. Севастополь зараз представлений тільки однією пам'яткою і одним фото, Крим — 12 пам'яток і 51 фото. Детальніше — у таблиці:
Регіон | К-ть пам'яток | К-ть фото |
---|---|---|
Севастополь | 1 | 1 |
АР Крим | 12 | 51 |
Закарпаття | 26 | 96 |
Миколаївщина | 29 | 81 |
Рівненщина | 36 | 186 |
Херсонщина | 36 | 83 |
Житомирщина | 55 | 324 |
Донеччина | 57 | 153 |
Тернопільщина | 62 | 234 |
Буковина | 75 | 220 |
Луганщина | 82 | 90 |
Львівщина | 82 | 351 |
Кіровоградщина | 88 | 181 |
Волинь | 98 | 270 |
Одещина | 115 | 383 |
Сумщина | 129 | 414 |
Дніпропетровщина | 139 | 278 |
Київ | 159 | 248 |
Хмельниччина | 166 | 538 |
Полтавщина | 171 | 594 |
Харківщина | 175 | 625 |
Київщина | 181 | 651 |
Черкащина | 186 | 455 |
Прикарпаття | 240 | 305 |
Вінничина | 242 | 775 |
Запоріжжя | 253 | 317 |
Чернігівщина | 305 | 519 |
Зі списками пам'яток можна ознайомитися тут. Усі номінації та спецномінації конкурсу описані тут.
Цього року у конкурсі є вісім спеціальних номінацій:
- «Аерофото» — для фото з повітря (зроблені дронами, квадрокоптерами тощо). Для того, щоб робота потрапила на спецномінацію потрібно вибрати її у Завантажувачі;
- «Відео» — для відеосюжетів з пам'ятками;
- «Єврейська спадщина» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Млини» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Пам'ятки національно-визвольної боротьби» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Пам'ятки Подесення» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом, і без нього;
- «Via Regia Ukraine» — для об'єктів із охоронним статусом 15 населених пунктів, що за цим маршрутом є.
Більше інформації про конкурс дивіться за посиланням. Щоб отримувати інформацію про новинки у конкурсі — підпишіться на наші блог та сторінку у фейсбук.
Приєднуйтеся!
Якщо у Вас є запитання, можете звертатися wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук – З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки». 19:05, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви брали участь в одному із фотоконкурсів «Вікімедіа Україна» чи допомагали (наприклад, редагували файли з цих конкурсів).
If you do not speak Ukrainian, but you are interested in a contest, you can check out our page in English here.
Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні: дякуємо! Пройдіть опитування!
[edit]Привіт!
Прийом робіт на цьогорічний фотоконкурс «Вікі любить пам'ятки» завершено! Ми дуже вдячні, що Ви взяли участь у змаганні!
В українській частині «Вікі любить пам'ятки»:
- майже 25400 світлин завантажено
- Україна посідає друге місце у світі за цим показником!
- 335 учасників
- з них — 156 (47%) зареєструвалися після початку.
Детальніша статистика (за об'єктами, завантажувачами тощо) буде трохи згодом. Стежте за оновленнями у блозі wlm.org.ua — підпишіться, щоб отримувати повідомлення про нові дописи на електронну пошту!
Дуже просимо пройти опитування, щоб ми могли удосконалити наш конкурс наступного разу: відгук.
Протягом наступних двох місяців журі буде оцінювати роботи. А оргкомітет буде переглядати світлини й виправляти помилки — якщо Ви помітили якісь неточності (не та пам'ятка на конкурсних фотографіях тощо), будь ласка, напишіть нам на електронну адресу: wlmwikimedia.org.ua чи у фейсбук
Ви можете, тим часом, номінувати найкращі із своїх світлин на «якісні» чи «вибрані» у Вікісховищі. Детальніше про це тут: «Вибираємо значущі, якісні, вибрані зображення». А також ілюструвати світлинами статті у Вікіпедії, де це буде доречно.
З повагою, Оргкомітет «Вікі любить пам'ятки»
Ви отримали це повідомлення, оскільки Ви взяли участь в Вікі любить пам'ятки 2021 в Україні. 20:37, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1403.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1403.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Микола Василечко (talk) 06:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1404.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1404.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Микола Василечко (talk) 06:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1401.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1401.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Микола Василечко (talk) 06:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1402.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1402.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Микола Василечко (talk) 06:57, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1405.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1405.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Микола Василечко (talk) 06:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1402.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1402.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1402.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Микола Василечко.
And also:
- File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1405.jpg ( Nominator : Микола Василечко | Reason : This media file is a derivative work incorporating another work or works. While the source of this file has been identified, essential source information for all work incorporated in this file is missing. )
- File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1403.jpg ( Nominator : Микола Василечко | Reason : This media file is a derivative work incorporating another work or works. While the source of this file has been identified, essential source information for all work incorporated in this file is missing. )
- File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1401.jpg ( Nominator : Микола Василечко | Reason : This media file is a derivative work incorporating another work or works. While the source of this file has been identified, essential source information for all work incorporated in this file is missing. )
- File:Шманьківці, Інтер'єр церкви святих безсрібників Косми і Даміана, 1404.jpg ( Nominator : Микола Василечко | Reason : This media file is a derivative work incorporating another work or works. While the source of this file has been identified, essential source information for all work incorporated in this file is missing. )
I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:16, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Попередження про порушення авторських прав
[edit]Відповідно до Закону України «Про авторське право і суміжні права»:
Стаття 8. Об’єкти авторського права.
1. Об’єктами авторського права є твори у галузі науки, літератури і мистецтва, а саме:
14) похідні твори;
Дефініція: «похідний твір - твір, що є творчою переробкою іншого існуючого твору без завдавання шкоди його охороні (анотація, адаптація, аранжування, обробка фольклору, інша переробка твору)»
Отже, розписи стін церкви, вишиті корогви, різьблені Царські ворота, іконостаси є похідними роботами. На завантаження таких світлин потрібні дозволи від художників, вишивальників, різьбярів. --Микола Василечко (talk) 07:21, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Зрозумів, дякую!--Максим Огородник (talk) 07:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
- Микола Василечко У Семаківцях на території церкви розташована фігура св. Яна.[1] Її виготовили у 1930-х роках.[2] Якщо я завантажу її світлину на Вікісховище, чи не буде це порушення авторських прав?--Максим Огородник (talk) 08:47, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Витяги із Закону: «Стаття 28. Строк дії авторського права
1. Авторське право на твір виникає внаслідок факту його створення і починає діяти від дня створення твору.
2. Авторське право діє протягом усього життя автора і 70 років після його смерті, крім випадків, передбачених цією статтею.
3. Для творів, оприлюднених анонімно або під псевдонімом, строк дії авторського права закінчується через 70 років після того, як твір було оприлюднено. Якщо взятий автором псевдонім не викликає сумніву щодо особи автора або якщо авторство твору, оприлюдненого анонімно або під псевдонімом, розкривається не пізніше ніж через 70 років після оприлюднення твору, застосовується строк, передбачений частиною другою цієї статті.
4. Авторське право на твори, створені у співавторстві, діє протягом життя співавторів і 70 років після смерті останнього співавтора.
6. Авторське право на твори посмертно реабілітованих авторів діє протягом 70 років після їх реабілітації.» --Микола Василечко (talk) 09:10, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started
[edit]Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015, Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.
If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.
If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.
Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".
If you had already uploaded a file this year, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.
Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.
Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list
Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021
Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--05:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Іван Водвуд
[edit]Ви звантажили портрет музиканта, але про нього ще немає статті. Не бажаєте написати?--UeArtemis (talk) 08:58, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Він наразі незначущий для Вікі.--Максим Огородник (talk) 09:26, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
Конкурс наукових фотографій 2021: Подавайте свої зображення та вигравайте призи
[edit]Привіт!
До середи 15 грудня включно триває українська частина міжнародного Конкурсу наукових фотографій 2021.
Ви брали участь в українських наукових фотоконкурсах раніше, тож, сподіваємося, вас зацікавить і цей. Подавати зображення можна у п’яти категоріях: «Люди в науці», «Мікроскопія», «Живі організми», «Загальна категорія», «Нефотографічні зображення».
Якщо у вас є релевантні фотографії в архіві — наприклад, світлини науковців за роботою чи фото з наукових експедицій — саме час розібрати їх, подати на конкурс і поборотися за цінні призи на українському та міжнародному рівні. Своєю участю ви також допоможете проілюструвати Вікіпедію — найбільшу онлайн-енциклопедію, яку читають мільйони людей.
Приєднуйтеся! Якщо будуть питання, пишіть на SciencePhotowikimedia.org.ua — а також підписуйтеся на нас у Фейсбуку і Телеграмі, щоб стежити за новинами.
--Антон Процюк [ВМУА] (від імені організаційної команди конкурсу) 19:18, 8 December 2021 (UTC)