User:Jheald/BLproject
Working page for the templated legal notices for different types of content for an upload in conjunction with the BL.
The content was all created before 1800; it mostly consists of engravings and engraved maps, with some drawings and hand-drawn maps.
Relevant classes for CDPA transitional provisions for existing works are defined by their classification under the 1956 Act. (CDPA sch 1 clause 12(1)):
- Under the 1956 Act "artistic works" encompasses "paintings, sculptures, drawings, engravings and photographs" (all irrespective of artistic quality), "works of architecture, being either buildings or models for buildings", and "works of artistic craftsmanship, not falling within either of the preceding paragraphs" (1956 Act s.3(1)).
- "Drawings" include "any diagram, map, chart or plan" (1956 Act s.48(1)).
- "Engravings" include "any etching, lithograph, woodcut, print or similar work, not being a photograph" (1956 Act s.48(1)).
Standard (published in the C18th, known creator)
[edit]- UK copyright term (flowchart) & legal basis:
- 70 years pma ..... (CDPA sch 1 clause 12(6) fall-through --> CDPA s.12(2) as amended)
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
This digital reproduction has been released under the following licenses:
In many jurisdictions, faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are not copyrightable. The Wikimedia Foundation's position is that these works are not copyrightable in the United States (see Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs). In these jurisdictions, this work is actually in the public domain and the requirements of the digital reproduction's license are not compulsory. |
Posthumous first publication in the C18th (known creator)
[edit]- For engravings (not maps/charts), if author died more than 20 years before first publication: copyright term is 50 years after publication ..... (CDPA sch 1 clause 12(2)(b) --> 1956 Act s 3(4)(a)), if longer than CDPA 12(2) above (SI 1995/3297 Cl 15(1))
- (this is the technically appropriate set of tag templates; but in practice if we're not too careful, we might simply use the standard-case one above).
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain in its source country for the following reason:
The work of art itself is in the public domain in the United States for the following reason:
This digital reproduction has been released under the following licenses:
In many jurisdictions, faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are not copyrightable. The Wikimedia Foundation's position is that these works are not copyrightable in the United States (see Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs). In these jurisdictions, this work is actually in the public domain and the requirements of the above license are not compulsory.
|
Published in C18th (unknown creator)
[edit]- Copyright term: 70 years after first publication ..... ( CDPA s.12(3)(b) as amended; because this exceeds CDPA sch 1 clause 12(3)(a) --> 1956 Act Sch 2, per SI 1995/3297 Cl 15(1))
The following template combination, though we might simply use the previous above even if its UK rationale wouldn't quite be exact
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain in its source country for the following reason:
The work of art itself is in the public domain in the United States for the following reason:
This digital reproduction has been released under the following licenses:
In many jurisdictions, faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are not copyrightable. The Wikimedia Foundation's position is that these works are not copyrightable in the United States (see Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs). In these jurisdictions, this work is actually in the public domain and the requirements of the above license are not compulsory.
|
Crown copyright expired (whether or not published)
[edit]- For artistic works made "by an officer or servant of the Crown in the course of his duties" other than unpublished engravings (see TNA flowchart)
- No publication rights are available for material that was crown copyright. (SI 1996/2967 Cl 16(5))
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
This digital reproduction has been released under the following licenses:
In many jurisdictions, faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are not copyrightable. The Wikimedia Foundation's position is that these works are not copyrightable in the United States (see Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs). In these jurisdictions, this work is actually in the public domain and the requirements of the digital reproduction's license are not compulsory. |
Unpublished (known creator)
[edit]- For unpublished artistic works with a known creator, other than unpublished engravings: 70 years pma ..... (CDPA sch 1 clause 12(6) fall-through --> CDPA s.12(2) as amended)
- A publication right may be running, if the work has been communicated to the public since 1996 (SI 1996/2967 cl 16). With luck, any of these should have been turned up in the recent recataloguing, but that needs to be checked and cannot be guaranteed.
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain in its source country for the following reason:
The work of art itself is in the public domain in the United States for the following reason:
In many jurisdictions, faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are not copyrightable. The Wikimedia Foundation's position is that these works are not copyrightable in the United States (see Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs). In these jurisdictions, this work is actually in the public domain and the requirements of the above license are not compulsory.
|
Unpublished (unknown creator)
[edit]- For unpublished artistic works with an unknown creator (see TNA flowchart)
- No publication rights are available for works where copyright has not yet expired (SI 1996/2967 Cl. 16(1))
- If the author has ever been identified, s/he is no longer unknown; for works of this age copyright would have expired, so in that case a publication right might be running. It must be not possible to identify the author by "reasonable inquiry".
This is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain in its source country for the following reason:
The work of art itself is in the public domain in the United States for the following reason:
In many jurisdictions, faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are not copyrightable. The Wikimedia Foundation's position is that these works are not copyrightable in the United States (see Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs). In these jurisdictions, this work is actually in the public domain and the requirements of the above license are not compulsory.
|
Other cases
[edit]- Unpublished engravings with known authors will remain in copyright until 2039, with no s.57 infringement waiver available. In principle the copyright could be claimed by an heir.
- Engravings by known authors that were unpublished in the 18th century but have published since 1969 (with the permission of the copyright owners) will be in copyright until 2039 (if published after 1988), or until 50 years after publication (otherwise).
- Types of unpublished items other than "artistic works" (ie unpublished literary, dramatic, or musical works) with known authors would similarly be caught by the 2039 issue.
- If there are any works of unknown authorship, that were unpublished in the 18th century but were first published between 1969 and 1989 with the permission of the copyright owners, the wording of the template above would not be quite right because they would not then be 2039 works. However they would still fall within the terms of s.57