User:ComputerHotline/Archive 3
Scale bar
[edit]Hi! Just being curious why you think that the scale bar in File:Plan-fort-roppe-fr-FR.svg is correct. Usually (in fact in all instances I remember) scale bars are divided in equal intervals. In this case for instance one could have three intervals corresponding to 50 m each. In the plan, what length do the black and white bars in the scale bar have? bamse (talk) 17:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Because it's the real scale. I measured it.--ComputerHotline (talk) 05:23, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hm, not sure we understand each other. I just wondered why you have split the 150 m in three intervals of about 46.5 metres and one interval of about 10.5 metres. Without a ruler it is impossible for the reader to know how long these intervals are. Why bother creating these intervals then? bamse (talk) 11:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know how to make it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 15:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hm, not sure we understand each other. I just wondered why you have split the 150 m in three intervals of about 46.5 metres and one interval of about 10.5 metres. Without a ruler it is impossible for the reader to know how long these intervals are. Why bother creating these intervals then? bamse (talk) 11:20, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 2010-10-03 15-45-17-fort-roppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Lepidoptera 5
[edit]This is Nessaea aglaura (Doubleday, 1848). Very nice photo, fortunately showing the orange patch on the hind wing. Many thanks for making it available.All the best from Ireland Robert aka Notafly (talk) 08:56, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Curious as to how you've handled commercial requests for your work
[edit]Hello,
I’m curious as to how you’ve dealt with commercial requests to use your work, as I am trying to get some ideas on how to handle these types of requests. I have received a few myself but have deferred to the licensing terms of the CC/GFDL and now realize that I have probably left some money on the table. For example, what has or hasn’t worked for you, what kind (s) of licensing do you use for, and what else you can think of that may be helpful. If you feel it’s more appropriate, we can continue this discussion via email. Thanks. BrokenSphere (Talk) 20:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Idea leuconoe 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Egl thann.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Morpho peleides 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Agraulis vanillae 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Papilio rumanzovia 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Caligo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Idea leuconoe 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Idea leuconoe 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 14-07-59-fort-roppe-lp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 15-18-19-f-roppe-lp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salbert-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Christmas image
[edit]Hi, I wonder why you chose File:14-33-29-ouv-schoenenbourg.jpg for Picture of the day on December 24. It's just a tunnel, so it's got nothing to do with Christmas, or does it? Hekerui (talk) 10:48, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
- Only because it's a featured picture and this day hasn't got a POD at this time. --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:10, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Agraulis vanillae 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Agraulis vanillae 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 15-40-45-ouv-g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 12-53-36-f-lachaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:15-18-19-f-roppe-lp.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-18-19-f-roppe-lp.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! 12-27-22-f-lachaux.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Morpho peleides 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Morpho peleides 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
FP Promotion File:15-02-21-f-giro.jpg
[edit]Bonjour, Thomas!
Excuse-moi de mon erreur FP.
Ta nomination FP est décorée, j'ai corrigé cela.
Très amical --George Chernilevsky talk 08:27, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:15-02-21-f-giro.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:15-02-21-f-giro.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Entree-mat-ouv-g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! F-uxegney-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ouv-g-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! F-uxegney-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ouv-g-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ouv-g-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! F-uxegney-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
* * * :) * * *
[edit]--George Chernilevsky talk 12:41, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! F-uxegney-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Belfort-Pano-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Belfort-Pano-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! F-salbert-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Philaethria
[edit]Bonjour, je viens de placer une de vos photos pour illustrer l'infobox de ce genre, je voulais vous en informer. Bonne journée--Rosier (talk) 16:18, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vallee-brouillard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ballon-alsace2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Belfort-Pano-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Belfort-Pano-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |