User:ComputerHotline/Archive 29

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-04-26 17-16-36 cadenas-amour-pont-des-arts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-04-26 17-22-41 cadenas-amour-pont-des-arts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-07-28 15-08-35 magasin-sect-bosmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. W.carter 08:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-07-28 15-00-15 magasin-sect-bosmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Really cool pic! :) W.carter 08:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-08-27 23-53-14 orage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks very good. I have made a couple of notes with possible cleaning issues, please evaluate whether they should be removed. --Peulle 07:06, 30 August 2016 (UTC). No, it's the integrity of this image. --ComputerHotline 08:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC) Support OK, it has my vote. If someone disagrees, they can take the image to CR. --Peulle 16:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-08-27 23-13-23 orage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment What is that straight line of light with red dots? --Peulle 07:10, 30 August 2016 (UTC) Plane. --ComputerHotline 08:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)  Support OK by me, then. --Peulle 16:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-12-02 22-14-39 lightpainting.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-12-02 22-00-08 lightpainting.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --The Photographer 15:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-12-03 10-00-47 nodule (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:17, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-11-28 14-54-06 chirurgie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Hope you are better now. :) --W.carter 19:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC). Yes, thanks a lot. --ComputerHotline 11:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2015-07-27 20-51-30 Macroglossum-stellatarum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2015-07-27 20-51-30 Macroglossum-stellatarum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 16:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2011-12-25 10-10-36-capteur-cx7300-34f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 12:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-02-10 22-41-12 zvereff-valdoie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-02-17 22-30-12 lp-zvereff.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-12 23-10-52 lp-ac-haut-bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:47, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-01 23-01-50 laiterie-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportUnusual, but good.--Jebulon 09:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-01 22-49-53 laiterie-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:18, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 22:39, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-09-01 22-58-19 laiterie-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:17, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2018-01-25 20-21-51 meeting-lrem-modem-belfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:24, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016-01-20 19-42-36 Chou-romanesco 70f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Basotxerri 15:11, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2018 (UTC)