User:Carlosar~commonswiki/Talk/Aug2006
Hi. Please add Image copyright tags to Image:Lula jintao131104.jpeg. If you don't know the copyright status of the image you uploaded please tag it as "unknown", although the image may have to be deleted in this case. Thanks -- Chris 73 02:32, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Thank you -- Chris 73 11:10, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Again, could you add the source and copyright tags to the images you uploaded? Image:Billgates.jpg looks somewhat copyrighted. For now I have tagged your image as "Unknown". If there are no tags, the image may have to be deleted. Thanks -- Chris 73 00:01, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Hi. It seems Image:Mst.jpg is under a non-commercial license. Unfortunately, the commons does not accept non-commercial licenses. Do you have the image also under a different license? -- Chris 73 03:49, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- I changed the picture.-- Carlosar
... has been deleted as the image is not PD, but rather the copyright of FireFox. While the software is GNU licensed, screenshots are not automatically so. -- Chris 73 04:40, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, I am afraid. There was a discussion about this, and the conclusion was that even if the software is under the GNU license, this does not mean that the screenshot is in the GFDL. This is probably more of a legal oversight of the GFDL license than anything else, but for now the screenshot is copyrighted. This does apply to a lot of screenshots. Microsoft for example has a specific regulation about the use of MS product screenshots. Sorry again! -- Chris 73 03:10, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Ok, it is all right. Thank you! -- Carlosar 15:20, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Banner.jpg
[edit]Hi, please see this mailing list post. If you have any questions send me a mail. Thank you, Www.wikinerds.org 04:47, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Image:CarnavalBrazilRio2005.jpg
[edit]Oi Carlos,
Primeiro gostaria de agradecer a imagem Image:CarnavalBrazilRio2005.jpg, a muito agardava uma foto de carnaval. Sobre ela gostaria de colocar duas sugestões:
- Com a anuência do autor da foto troque a licença da imagem de GPL para GFDL ou para Cc-by, essas licenças são mais adequadas para texto e fotografia enquanto a GPL é mais adequada para codigo fonte.
- Coloque o nome do autor junto a foto, pois todas as licenças exigem isso, mesmo as livres.
Abraço,
Gbiten 10:33, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Hi, I have another copyright question for you. In the above image, you say the publishers don't claim copyright. What does that mean, exactly? Did they just not say anything, or did they expressly release the image? -- Ranveig 17:08, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- They said nothing. I am trying to contacting the authors.
- Thanks, and good luck. -- Ranveig 01:14, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
hi - that image appears to be a scannes magazine page and is as such a copyright violation. I'm going to delete the image. If it has indeed be released under a free license, contact me and i will undelete it. -- Duesentrieb 03:24, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Same for Image:Veja-Tentaculos-46.jpg -- Duesentrieb 03:25, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Ok. Thanks for the warning.--Carlosar 03:27, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Sorry, but Commons is not supposed to contain unfree images such as licensed under Fair Use. Please don't upload them. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko 15:28, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
John Paul II
[edit]The images of John Paul II you uploaded has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. Thuresson 16:42, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Image:Embraer supertucano.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. Thuresson 01:09, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Wade Goree
[edit]Carlos, quem é Wade Goree? Por favor, acrescente essa informação em Image:Lula Wade Goree.jpg. --Patrick-br 12:42, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Soccer Logos from HQFL
[edit]Hello - I have put the soccer logos up for deletion, because the design is copyrighted either by the individual clubs or the designer that did the original logo. Note that the images on HQFL can not be used freele, see the deletion request for an explanation. -- Duesentrieb 10:13, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:Eurovatican.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Thuresson 06:34, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:GW-Bush-in-uniform.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Thuresson 11:59, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for providing images to the commons. Please have a look at the new description of the picture. If you upload a new picture from Agência Brasil please give all this informations (also the copyright tag for the Agência Brasil) or the picture will be deleted. I have seen this picture accidentally with an unknown tag. Obrigado ! --- gildemax 17:29, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Image:MauricioMarinho propina TVCamara.jpg
[edit]Caro Carlos, eu não concordo com a marcação de direito autoral de Image:MauricioMarinho propina TVCamara.jpg, posto que a imagem foi veiculada pela TV Câmara, mas não é de sua autoria. Por favor, verifique Commons:Deletion requests#January 3. Obrigado pela atenção. --Patrick-br msg 17:04, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | Image:DPF.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. |
Também questionei o Template:TVCamaraBr. --Patrick-br msg 12:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Por favor, cite os vídeos que considera trabalhos derivados. Se o vídeo é uma cópia exata do material produzido pela TV Câmara (isto é, o conteúdo não foi alterado) ele não é um material derivado. Estou correto?
- Caro Carlos, o problema é justamente esse: parece que você não compreendeu o significado da licença GNU FDL. Qualquer material, para que possa ser classificado nessa licença ou em alguma compatível, deve permitir trabalhos derivados a o uso comercial. --Patrick-br msg 16:08, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Carlos, os documentos produzidos pelo governo americano estão no domínio público em função do que dispõe o United States Code, em seu Título 17, Seção 105. Não há nenhuma norma nesse sentido no Brasil. A Agência Brasil permite o uso livre do seu material. Isso é bastante diferente de reprodução livre. Outras TVs que utilizam esse material sem pagar estão utilizando as opções previstas em lei que você citou. Mas essas opções não são compatíveis com a licença GNU FDL. --Patrick-br msg 16:26, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Sobre a legislação dos EUA: Work of the United States Government. Uma descrição da licença CC-BY-SA-2.5 (semelhante à GNU FDL, mas mais inteligível), aqui: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/ --Patrick-br msg 16:53, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Copyleft
[edit]Carlos, acho que você ainda não entendeu perfeitamente o tipo de conceito copyleft utilizado no commons (a licença GNU FDL). Essa licença tem origem no movimento do software livre, que toma por base os seguintes pilares:
- A liberdade de executar o programa, para qualquer propósito (liberdade nº 0)
- A liberdade de estudar como o programa funciona, e adaptá-lo para as suas necessidades (liberdade nº 1). Acesso ao código-fonte é um pré-requisito para esta liberdade.
- A liberdade de redistribuir cópias de modo que você possa ajudar ao seu próximo (liberdade nº 2).
- A liberdade de aperfeiçoar o programa, e liberar os seus aperfeiçoamentos, de modo que toda a comunidade se beneficie (liberdade nº 3). Acesso ao código-fonte é um pré-requisito para esta liberdade.
Eu destaquei esta última liberdade, para enfatizá-la que ela também está presente na licença GNU FDL. E o material da TV Câmara não se encaixa nela, não há previsão explícita à liberdade de modificar (fazer trabalho derivado e explorá-lo comercialmente). O fato de as estações de TV utilizarem esse material é uma não relacionada ao que estamos discutindo. O commons só utiliza material que seja realmente livre. A justificativa "ah, mas os outros usam" não é válida. --Patrick-br msg 13:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Os conceitos que você vem defendendo (inclusive o uso do material por outras outras emissoras comerciais) não são compatíveis com a licença GNU FDL. Constituem fair use e não são aceitos no commons e na wikipédia em português. --Patrick-br msg 11:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:RomeuQueiroz20051214 002.jpg
[edit]
|
Thanks for uploading Image:RomeuQueiroz20051214 002.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a gallery of images you have uploaded at the Gallery by choosing 'commons.wikimedia.org' and typing your username in. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Spangineeren es (háblame) 04:04, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:RomeuQueiroz20051214 003.jpg
[edit]
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:RomeuQueiroz20051214 003.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a gallery of images you have uploaded at the Gallery by choosing 'commons.wikimedia.org' and typing your username in. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Spangineeren es (háblame) 04:04, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Iraq-elections2005.jpg
[edit]
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Iraq-elections2005.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Romeo Bravo (T | C) 20:12, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Iraq-election2005-V.jpg
[edit]
|
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Iraq-election2005-V.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Romeo Bravo (T | C) 20:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
| Image deletion warning | All files in Category:Photographs by Agencia Camara from Brazil has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry. |
Imagens da Agência do Brasil
[edit]Carlos, não adianta carregarmos as imagens da Agência se não informarmos o fotógrafo e a URL! Quanto a URL das imagens, clique sempre no exibir imagens e copie o link que aparecer no navegador. Siga o exemplo de Image:149410.jpeg, por exemplo. Até mais. -- Fernando S. Aldado 17:12, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Vatican white smoke 1978.jpg
[edit]
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Vatican white smoke 1978.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 19:10, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Image:100%-red.png and others - please link images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]][[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.--gildemax 18:42, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 16:09, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Karol Wojtyla at 12.jpg
[edit]
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Karol Wojtyla at 12.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Samulili 14:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Image tagging of Vatican white smoke 1978
[edit]| Image deletion warning | Image:Vatican white smoke 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry. |
Nilfanion 17:40, 13 August 2006 (UTC)