User:Butko/Declined VI candidates

Declined

View opposition
Nominated by: Butko (talk) on 2010-10-02 12:41 (UTC)
Scope: Chamelea gallina, shell
Oppose Has already a VI (here) of a life specimen. Lycaon (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2010 (UTC) `Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC)`
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Butko (talk) on 2010-10-02 12:45 (UTC)
Scope: Turritella terebra, shell
Oppose IMO failing criterion III as these are incomplete shells (see here). Lycaon (talk) 16:06, 2 October 2010 (UTC) `Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:15, 6 October 2010 (UTC)`
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Butko (talk) on 2010-10-02 09:45 (UTC)
Scope: Medal «Veteran of Labour»
I think that the difference between the two "greys" of the ribbon is more visible here. Thoughts ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC) Oppose Agree with Jebulon. Lycaon (talk) 15:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. Lycaon (talk) 21:34, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Butko (talk) on 2010-10-05 08:16 (UTC)
Scope: Tadorna cana (Cape Shelduck)
Oppose I think it is a subadult female (pale brown on head and neck) and as such does not illustrate well. Lycaon (talk) 21:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. Lycaon (talk) 05:58, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Butko (talk) on 2010-10-11 14:40 (UTC)
Scope: Capela-martyrios with an underground mausoleum in Chersones
Oppose Sorry, the scope seems too narrow and not suitably generic enough to me. --Myrabella (talk) 21:20, 13 October 2010 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. Lycaon (talk) 23:45, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Butko (talk) on 2010-10-19 11:14 (UTC)
Scope: Panasonic SDR-H80
Reason: Info All images in Category:Panasonic SDR-H80 created by me --Butko (talk) 14:36, 4 October 2010 (UTC) -- Butko (talk)
Not reviewed in previous nomination. --Butko (talk) 11:14, 19 October 2010 (UTC) Oppose should use a white background for objects such as these. Jolly Janner (talk) 20:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC) `Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC)`
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View opposition
Nominated by: Butko (talk) on 2010-10-19 14:02 (UTC)
Scope: Mecistomela marginata
Reason: Single image in scope -- Butko (talk)
Oppose Fails criterion 3 IMO. Too bad quality (blur, shadow, unsharpness), and therefore does not illustrate well the subject, even alone in scope.--Jebulon (talk) 23:34, 21 October 2010 (UTC) `Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)`
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)