Template talk:PD-AM-exempt
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The linked PDF says:
The following are an object of Copyright:
where this template says:
The following are not an object of Copyright:
Is there a better reference validating the claims of the template? -- Paddu 21:12, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I think this misprint in English PDF-text is insignificant, the name of article 6 is clearly defined the gist. This misprint in the most of English translations of this law - because this translation had come from the UNESCO-portal [1]. If you want, you can reffered to Russian text of law [2]. Alex Spade 22:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)