File talk:Deutsch Stromerzeugung 25-26-Mai-2012.png
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Leistungskurve ist nicht "Stromerzeugungskurve"
[edit]- 1. Die Dilletanten benennen doch glatt die an sich wunderbare Kurve als "Stromerzeugung". In Wahrheit ist "Strom" in [A] also Ampere benannt (Elektronen- oder Ionenmenge je sec) oder Ladungen/ s.
- 2. Es handelt sich, wie in der Ordinate richtig benannt, um fluktuierende Leistung, Einheit ist richtig benannt in [MW]!
- 3. Leistung ist nicht Energiemenge oder Energie.
- Interpretation: Es wurden, wie die Kurve zeigt, mittags fast 2 h lang 60.000 MW Leistung erreicht. Ein AKW hat eine Dauerleistung von 1200 MW, 24h und zwar ca. 11 Monate, 1 Monat Uranstäbe austauschen. Also zumindest 2h lang leisten die Fotozellen Dtl.`s 60 GW/ 1,2 GW = 50 AKW. D.h., sowiel wie 50 AKW. 25.8.2012, Eco-Ing.! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.174.138.152 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 25 August 2012
- The power is in units of MWh/hr, or MW. Delphi234 (talk) 22:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Delphi234, there is no need to answer this. This user has been banned long ago because he attacked nearly every user in ther German wikipedia. He is a troll who needs to bash everyone else. Just ignore him. And thank you for all of your files and graphs you made! Andol (talk) 21:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. It was a nonsense question. Delphi234 (talk) 01:30, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Delphi234, there is no need to answer this. This user has been banned long ago because he attacked nearly every user in ther German wikipedia. He is a troll who needs to bash everyone else. Just ignore him. And thank you for all of your files and graphs you made! Andol (talk) 21:03, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Data source and raw data
[edit]Where does the data come from? Do you have a raw data copy (with the exact values) e.g. as CSV? --MartinThoma (talk) 08:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)