File:Schematic-representation-of-the-major-components-of-the-forest-carbon-cycle.jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 614 × 600 pixels. Other resolutions: 246 × 240 pixels | 491 × 480 pixels | 788 × 770 pixels.
Original file (788 × 770 pixels, file size: 95 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
This image was uploaded in the JPEG format even though it consists of non-photographic data. This information could be stored more efficiently or accurately in the PNG or SVG format. If possible, please upload a PNG or SVG version of this image without compression artifacts, derived from a non-JPEG source (or with existing artifacts removed). After doing so, please tag the JPEG version with {{Superseded|NewImage.ext}} and remove this tag. This tag should not be applied to photographs or scans. If this image is a diagram or other image suitable for vectorisation, please tag this image with {{Convert to SVG}} instead of {{BadJPEG}}. If not suitable for vectorisation, use {{Convert to PNG}}. For more information, see {{BadJPEG}}. |
Summary
[edit]DescriptionSchematic-representation-of-the-major-components-of-the-forest-carbon-cycle.jpg |
English: Schematic representation of the major components of the forest carbon cycle. Ra aboveground and Ra belowground : above- and belowground autotrophic respiration, respectively (their sum is indicated as Ra); Rh-soil and Rh-cwd: heterotrophic respiration from soil and coarse woody debris, respectively (their sum is indicated as Rh); NPP aboveground and NPP belowground : above- and belowground net primary production, respectively (their sum is indicated as NPP); Reco: ecosystem respiration (Reco=Ra+Rh); GPP: gross primary production (GPP=NPP+Ra), and NEP: net ecosystem production (NEP=GPP−Reco=NPP−Rh). Each flux is associated with an arrow. Arrows pointing down indicate carbon (C) uptake, arrows pointing up indicate C release, whereas the up-down arrow indicates that both C release and C uptake can occur. The dark blue arrow indicates NEP, the mid-blue arrows indicate the primary components of NEP (Reco and GPP), whereas the light blue arrows indicate the components of Reco and GPP. |
Date | |
Source | M. Campioli et. al. "Evaluating the convergence between eddy-covariance and biometric methods for assessing carbon budgets of forests", Nature Communications doi:10.1038/ncomms13717 |
Author | M. Campioli, Y. Malhi, S. Vicca, S. Luyssaert, D. Papale, J. Peñuelas, M. Reichstein, M. Migliavacca, M. A. Arain, I. A. Janssens |
Permission (Reusing this file) |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
==Licensing==
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 23:01, 14 January 2020 | 788 × 770 (95 KB) | Daniel Mietchen (talk | contribs) | Uploaded by the NOA Upload Tool |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Short title | untitled |
---|