File:Rspb.2020.0805.pdf
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this JPG preview of this PDF file: 424 × 600 pixels. Other resolutions: 170 × 240 pixels | 339 × 480 pixels | 543 × 768 pixels | 1,239 × 1,752 pixels.
Original file (1,239 × 1,752 pixels, file size: 491 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 7 pages)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionRspb.2020.0805.pdf |
English: Mate choice can continue after mating via chemical communication between the female reproductive system and sperm. While there is a growing appreciation that females can bias sperm use and paternity by exerting cryptic female choice for preferred males, we know surprisingly little about the mechanisms underlying these post-mating choices. In particular, whether chemical signals released from eggs (chemoattractants) allow females to exert cryptic female choice to favour sperm from specific males remains an open question, particularly in species (including humans) where adults exercise pre-mating mate choice. Here, we adapt a classic dichotomous mate choice assay to the microscopic scale to assess gamete-mediated mate choice in humans. We examined how sperm respond to follicular fluid, a source of human sperm chemoattractants, from either their partner or a non-partner female when experiencing a simultaneous or non-simultaneous choice between follicular fluids. We report robust evidence under these two distinct experimental conditions that follicular fluid from different females consistently and differentially attracts sperm from specific males. This chemoattractant-moderated choice of sperm offers eggs an avenue to exercise independent mate preference. Indeed, gamete-mediated mate choice did not reinforce pre-mating human mate choice decisions. Our results demonstrate that chemoattractants facilitate gamete-mediated mate choice in humans, which offers females the opportunity to exert cryptic female choice for sperm from specific males. |
Date | |
Source |
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2020.0805 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0805 |
Author | John L. Fitzpatrick et al. |
Licensing
[edit]This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 18:03, 12 June 2020 | 1,239 × 1,752, 7 pages (491 KB) | Pamputt (talk | contribs) | Uploaded a work by John L. Fitzpatrick et al. from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2020.0805 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0805 with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on www.wikidata.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Short title | Chemical signals from eggs facilitate cryptic female choice in humans |
---|---|
Image title | Proc. R. Soc. B. 2020.287:20200805 |
Software used | Arbortext Advanced Print Publisher 10.0.1465/W Unicode |
Conversion program | Acrobat Distiller 8.1.0 (Windows); modified using iText 4.2.0 by 1T3XT |
Encrypted | no |
Page size | 595.276 x 841.89 pts (A4) |
Version of PDF format | 1.4 |