File:PSO Meta-Fitness Landscape (12 benchmark problems).JPG
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 800 × 529 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 212 pixels | 640 × 423 pixels | 1,042 × 689 pixels.
Original file (1,042 × 689 pixels, file size: 148 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
This image was uploaded in the JPEG format even though it consists of non-photographic data. This information could be stored more efficiently or accurately in the PNG or SVG format. If possible, please upload a PNG or SVG version of this image without compression artifacts, derived from a non-JPEG source (or with existing artifacts removed). After doing so, please tag the JPEG version with {{Superseded|NewImage.ext}} and remove this tag. This tag should not be applied to photographs or scans. If this image is a diagram or other image suitable for vectorisation, please tag this image with {{Convert to SVG}} instead of {{BadJPEG}}. If not suitable for vectorisation, use {{Convert to PNG}}. For more information, see {{BadJPEG}}. |
Summary
[edit]DescriptionPSO Meta-Fitness Landscape (12 benchmark problems).JPG |
English: Performance landscape showing how a simple Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) variant performs in aggregate on several benchmark problems when varying two PSO parameters. Lower meta-fitness values means better PSO performance. Such a performance landscape is very time-consuming to compute, especially for optimizers with several behavioural parameters, but it can be searched efficiently using the simple meta-optimization approach by Pedersen implemented in SwarmOps to uncover PSO parameters with good performance. Good choices would here seem to be in the region and , and the region and Deutsch: Gütefunktion, die zeigt wie gut eine einfache Variante der Partikelschwarmoptimierung (PSO) verschiedene Testfunktionen unter Veränderung zweier Parameter insgesamt bearbeitet. Ein kleinerer Meta-Fitness-Wert bedeutet eine bessere Performance der PSO. Eine gute Parameterwahl läge hier in der Region und , und in der Region und |
Date | |
Source | Own work |
Author | Pedersen, M.E.H., Tuning & Simplifying Heuristical Optimization, PhD Thesis, 2010, University of Southampton, School of Engineering Sciences, Computational Engineering and Design Group. |
Licensing
[edit]Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide. In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so: I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 07:50, 19 March 2010 | 1,042 × 689 (148 KB) | Optimering (talk | contribs) | {{Information |Description={{en|1=Performance landscape showing how a simple Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) variant performs in aggregate on several benchmark problems when varying two PSO parameters. Lower meta-fitness values means better PSO performa |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
There are no pages that use this file.
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
- Usage on es.wikipedia.org
- Usage on id.wikipedia.org
- Usage on it.wikipedia.org
- Usage on vi.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Author | Magnus |
---|---|
Date and time of data generation | 08:20, 15 March 2010 |
Date and time of digitizing | 08:20, 15 March 2010 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 52 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 52 |