File:NLC416-11jh009396-67174 最高法院年刊.pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file (875 × 1,410 pixels, file size: 4.76 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 155 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary

[edit]
最高法院年刊   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
〔偽〕最高法院年刊編輯處編輯
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
最高法院年刊
Publisher
最高法院書記廳第三科[發行者]
Description

分命令、解釋、判例、大事記4欄,接第3編自1943年7月1日至1944年12月底止

目錄
例言
命令
國民政府令
院令
解釋
解釋外國人民因押款事件曾簽約拋棄領事裁判權中國法院有無受理之權疑義
解釋查獲鴉片案件究依刑法處斷抑依戰時物資移動取締暫行條例辦理疑義
解釋鄉公所職員假借職務上之便利私營商業適用法律疑義
解釋戰時民事特別法第十三條第一項第十八條第一項疑義
解釋戰時民事特別法第十五條第一項疑義
解釋債務人聲請停止強制執行未經司法行政部核定法院以裁定許其暫停執行之疑義
解釋商業同業公會章程所定地段限制應否受其拘束疑義
解釋戰時房屋租賃特別法第九條所定罰金疑義
解釋外國人執行異議之訴管轄權疑義
解釋外國人在中國應否有永租權及在收回之地界內是否有承租權疑義
解釋大赦條例第二條及陸海空軍刑法第三章第三十七條第四十八條第六十一條之罪應否減刑疑義
解釋股份有限公司之股東單獨以個人名義對於董事是否得提起自訴疑義
解釋典權回牘期限計算時效及關於劈典各疑義
解釋房屋租金及耕作租金其給付物之標準疑義
解釋私立學校校長離職接受贈與並轉讓私人用具是否觸犯刑法疑義
解釋私立學校校董會鈐記遺失主席校董另鐫新鈐未曾呈報備案而使用是否觸犯刑法疑義
解釋已確定之案件依照大赦條例減刑疑義
解釋監督寺廟條例第三條第三款疑義
解釋土地法第一百七十三條及土地法施行法第三十六第三十七條疑義
解釋公司股東能否選任本人為董事或監察人疑義
解釋黃金是否主要商品疑義
解釋戰時房屋租賃特別法醫師設立診療所應否受該法第三條保護疑義
解釋民法第四百四十二條及黃權適用疑義
解釋戰時房屋租賃特別法第一條疑義
解釋各軍事機關雇員能否依陸海空軍刑法第八條認為現服勤務之軍屬疑義
解釋商標登記爭執不易為確切之判決疑點五項疑義
解釋硬幣等與現在之聯幣儲幣折算疑義
解釋主要商品究指保種金屬而言疑義
解釋縣政府誤將不動產移轉外國教會如何救濟疑義
解釋律師消極資格之疑義
解釋會計師能否在兩省執行業務疑義
判例
民事判例
志樂西藥行等與齊恩因請求交貨或返還定金賠償損害上訴事件
聯益房產公司與有青考夫因請求遷讓房屋及給付欠租上訴事件
生康莊與鼎成行因請求償還貨款上訴事件
司徒森與鄧靄東因請求清算及返還股本上訴事件
孫徐氏等與孫念怙請求確認契約無效及回復原狀上訴事件
振新琺瑯廠等與鑫記公司經租處請求遷讓房屋上訴事件
遠東借款銀行與木衣沃爾日尼克因請求履行債務上訴事件
金趙氏與陳寶泉因請求回贖田畝上訴事件
王記木號與豫泰木行因請求給付貨款及返還定銀上訴事件
李孫氏等與尹傅氏因請求遷讓房屋抗告事件
戴伯玉與梅春勤等因請求終止租約遷讓房屋抗告事件
佘冠卿與事和順信記因請求終止租約遷讓房屋抗告事件
張謨遠等與張雲英等因請求確認遺囑有效聲請事件
嚴鍾毓與吳階雇因請求贖田上訴事件
謝問天與金伯雨因請求拆房交地及確認優先承租權等上訴事件
李壽平等與李泰道等因確認契約無效上訴事件
胡蘇氏與胡維金等確認身份上訴事件
翁思雲等與翁思賢等因確認買賣契約無效上訴事件
鮑惟祥與胡鮑氏因請求效還遺產管理權及確認嗣子身份不存在上訴事件
張毓麟與趙賈氏因贖產上訴事件
源豐興記五金號與金城鐵廠因請求交付貨物互訴上訴事件
徐維普等與沈昌洪因請求確認買賣契約無效上訴事件
陳美蓀等與周桂生因請求確認通行權上訴事件
張桂樵等與浙江興業銀行股份有限公司因請求宣告股東會決議無效上訴事件
謝全甫與梁金衍請求交付田畝抗告事件
黎秀軒與李孟資請求給付租金及交還鋪房抗告事件
賈新濤與朱金濤確認買賣契約有效抗告事件
刑事判例
嚴掄魁等瀆職上訴案
梁中瀆職非常上訴案
鄧澤勇傷害人致死非常上訴案
張啟昌瀆職非常上訴案
陸順義竊盜非常上訴案
張金髮脫逃非常上訴案
周天厚竊盜及脫逃抗告案
本院大事記

Language Chinese
Publication date 民國34[1945]
Source
institution QS:P195,Q732353
(民國時期文獻 民國圖書)
館藏信息
InfoField
MG/D929.5
主題
InfoField
最高法院
中圖分類
InfoField
D929.5
載體形態
InfoField
[150]頁

Licensing

[edit]
This image is in the public domain because it is a mere mechanical scan or photocopy of a public domain original, or – from the available evidence – is so similar to such a scan or photocopy that no copyright protection can be expected to arise. The original itself is in the public domain for the following reason:
Public domain
This image is now in the public domain in China because its term of copyright has expired.

According to copyright laws of the People's Republic of China (with legal jurisdiction in the mainland only, excluding Hong Kong and Macao), amended November 11, 2020, Works of legal persons or organizations without legal personality, or service works, or audiovisual works, enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation. For photography works of natural persons whose copyright protection period expires before June 1, 2021 belong to the public domain. All other works of natural persons enter the public domain 50 years after the death of the creator.
According to copyright laws of Republic of China (currently with jurisdiction in Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen, Matsu, etc.), all photographs and cinematographic works, and all works whose copyright holder is a juristic person, enter the public domain 50 years after they were first published, or if unpublished 50 years from creation, and all other applicable works enter the public domain 50 years after the death of the creator.

Important note: Works of foreign (non-U.S.) origin must be out of copyright or freely licensed in both their home country and the United States in order to be accepted on Commons. Works of Chinese origin that have entered the public domain in the U.S. due to certain circumstances (such as publication in noncompliance with U.S. copyright formalities) may have had their U.S. copyright restored under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) if the work was under copyright in its country of origin on the date that the URAA took effect in that country. (For the People's Republic of China, the URAA took effect on January 1, 1996. For the Republic of China (ROC), the URAA took effect on January 1, 2002.[1])
To uploader: Please provide where the image was first published and who created it or held its copyright.

You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.

čeština  Deutsch  English  português  română  slovenščina  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  македонски  русский  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  简体中文‎  繁體中文  +/−



This tag is designed for use where there may be a need to assert that any enhancements (eg brightness, contrast, colour-matching, sharpening) are in themselves insufficiently creative to generate a new copyright. It can be used where it is unknown whether any enhancements have been made, as well as when the enhancements are clear but insufficient. For known raw unenhanced scans you can use an appropriate {{PD-old}} tag instead. For usage, see Commons:When to use the PD-scan tag.


Note: This tag applies to scans and photocopies only. For photographs of public domain originals taken from afar, {{PD-Art}} may be applicable. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current04:18, 24 April 2023Thumbnail for version as of 04:18, 24 April 2023875 × 1,410, 155 pages (4.76 MB)PencakeBot (talk | contribs)Upload 最高法院年刊 (1/1) by (偽)最高法院年刊編輯處編輯 (batch task; nlc:data_416,11jh009396,67174; 民國圖書-PD2022.3; 最高法院年刊)

The following page uses this file:

Metadata