File:Carolien van Ham - Electoral manipulation in Africa (12 May 2015).webm
Original file (WebM audio/video file, VP8/Vorbis, length 21 min 44 s, 1,280 × 720 pixels, 778 kbps overall, file size: 120.9 MB)
Captions
Summary
[edit]DescriptionCarolien van Ham - Electoral manipulation in Africa (12 May 2015).webm |
English: Over 90 per cent of the world’s states currently select their national leaders through multiparty elections. However, in Africa the quality of elections still varies widely, ranging from elections plagued by violence and fraud to elections that are relatively ‘free and fair’. Yet, little is known about trade-offs between different strategies of electoral manipulation and the differences between incumbent and opposition actors’ strategies. We theorize that choices for specific types of manipulation are driven by available resources and cost considerations for both incumbents and opposition actors, and are mutually responsive. We also suggest that costs of manipulative strategies are shaped by the level of democratization. We test our hypotheses on time-series, cross-sectional dataset with observations for 286 African elections from 1986 to 2012. We find that democratization makes ‘cheap’ forms of electoral manipulation available to incumbents such as intimidation and manipulating electoral administration less viable, thus leading to increases in vote buying. The future of democracy in Africa thus promises elections where the administration of elections becomes better and better but at the same time vote buying will increase. Not all things go together, at least not all the time. The future of democracy in Africa will mean more money in politics, more patronage and more clientelistic offers thrown around, at least in the short to medium term.
Discussant: Dr. Ferran Martinez i Coma (University of Sydney) Chair: Max Grömping (University of Sydney) The Electoral Integrity Project is an independent research team based at the University of Sydney and the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. It explores many issues, focusing upon three main questions: - When do elections meet international standards of electoral integrity? - What happens when elections fail to do so? - And what can be done to mitigate these problems? For more information see: www.electoralintegrityproject.com |
Date | |
Source | YouTube: Carolien van Ham - Electoral manipulation in Africa (12 May 2015) – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today |
Author | Electoral Integrity Project |
Licensing
[edit]- You are free:
- to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
- to remix – to adapt the work
- Under the following conditions:
- attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
This file, which was originally posted to
YouTube: Carolien van Ham - Electoral manipulation in Africa (12 May 2015) – View/save archived versions on archive.org and archive.today, was reviewed on 14 May 2017 by reviewer Daphne Lantier, who confirmed that it was available there under the stated license on that date.
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 18:08, 13 May 2017 | 21 min 44 s, 1,280 × 720 (120.9 MB) | Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk | contribs) | Imported media from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-9FdJVyKFE |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Transcode status
Update transcode statusFile usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on he.wikipedia.org