File:An empirical comparison of design-build and design-bid-build project delivery methods (IA anempiricalcompa109451722).pdf
Original file (1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 873 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 153 pages)
Captions
Summary
[edit]An empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods ( ) | ||
---|---|---|
Author |
Hale, Darren Russell. |
|
Title |
An empirical comparison of design/build and design/bid/build project delivery methods |
|
Description |
This thesis project compares the performance of a homogeneous sample of United States Navy Bachelor Enlisted Quarters built using the Military Construction process. Projects will be broken into two sub-samples of design/bid/build and design/build projects to see if one project delivery method is superior in regards to time and cost. Project duration, project duration per bed, project time growth, cost growth and cost per bed will be statistically compared. Upon completion of the analysis the hypothesis that design/build projects are superior to design/bid/build projects in regards to time and cost will be tested. Subjects: Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies; Administration and Management; Economics and Cost Analysis; Construction; Costs; Naval shore facilities |
|
Language | English | |
Publication date | August 2005 | |
Current location |
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink |
|
Accession number |
anempiricalcompa109451722 |
|
Source | ||
Permission (Reusing this file) |
Approved for public release, distribution unlimited |
Licensing
[edit]Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.
|
||
This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. |
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/PDMCreative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0falsefalse
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 10:23, 14 July 2020 | 1,275 × 1,650, 153 pages (873 KB) | Fæ (talk | contribs) | FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection anempiricalcompa109451722 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #6948) |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Short title |
|
---|---|
Author | drh439 |
Software used | PScript5.dll Version 5.2.2 |
File change date and time | 06:07, 6 December 2010 |
Date and time of digitizing | 06:42, 3 August 2005 |
Date metadata was last modified | 06:07, 6 December 2010 |
Conversion program | Acrobat Distiller 6.0.1 (Windows) |
Encrypted | no |
Page size | 612 x 792 pts (letter) |
Version of PDF format | 1.4 |